Subject: Ethics

  • A Pandemic has broken out and the only key in sight is a drug developed by a group of doctors and scientists. The issue, however, is that the drug is not yet tested. If the standard testing protocol is adhered to, it would take at least a year to get the final approval for human consumption. By that time, the pandemic would have taken millions of lives already. The only possible way to expedite trials is to test the drug directly on human beings. It effectively means replacing animals with humans for trial. Furthermore, there would hardly be any volunteer for such trials. In the meantime, there is an idea floating around the countries. Why not choose the convicts of murders and rapes serving capital punishment for the trials? Even if they die during the trials, it would hardly be a loss to the society and if they survive, their lives would be of some worth for the society after-all. What do you think? Should prisoners be forced to undergo the trial? Examine and Substantiate your choice.10 Marks

    Mentor’s comment-

    • In the introduction briefly explain how the current case captures the ethical dilemma where lives of humans are weighed against the larger good of society.
    • In the body firstly, one must bring out the ethical values involved in the case such as – Violation of human rights,
      the debate of means vs. ends, concept of larger good etc.
      Then one should define the ethical dilemma involved in the situation.
      Identify the stakeholders involved; discuss the concerns associated with each of them.
      Examine the pros and cons of the move.
    • Conclude by suggesting a balanced solution to such a situation where ethical concerns of all the
      stakeholders are addressed. Justify your stand with suitable substantiation.
  • Discuss transparency and accountability as critical aspects in managing public health and pandemics. 10 marks

    Mentor’s comment-

    • In the introduction briefly explain that effective management of public health emergencies demands open and transparent public communication.
    • In the body define transparency and accountability first.
      Explain why they become important in public health management systems and disease outbreaks.
      You can present the case of COVID-19 or severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) crisis of 2003 and highlight the importance.
      Explain that Information should be communicated in a transparent, accurate and timely manner.
      Discuss the concerns – what if the system is not transparent and accountable.
    • Conclude by reasserting significance of it.
  • How ‘Vaccine Nationalism’ could block vulnerable populations’ access to COVID-19 vaccines

    Hundreds of COVID-19 vaccine candidates are currently being developed. Many countries are securing priority access to doses of COVID-19 vaccine.

    Practice question for Mains:

    Q. What is Vaccine Nationalism? Discuss various ethical issues involved and its impact on vulnerable populations across the globe.

    Vaccine nationalism during COVID-19

    • Vaccine nationalism occurs when a country manages to secure doses of vaccine for its own citizens or residents before they are made available in other countries.
    • This is done through pre-purchase agreements between a government and a vaccine manufacturer.
    • Vaccine nationalism is harmful to equitable access to vaccines.

    US begins to secure

    • In India, the privately held Serum Institute is developing one of the leading COVID-19 vaccine candidates.
    • The Serum Institute signalled that, if the development of the vaccine succeeds, most of the initial batches of the vaccine will be distributed within India.
    • At the same time, India, alongside the US and Russia, chose not to join the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator.
    • This was a WHO moves to promote collaboration among countries in the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments.

    Vaccine nationalism is not new

    • During the early stages of the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic, some of the wealthiest countries entered into pre-purchase agreements with several pharmaceutical companies working on H1N1 vaccines.
    • At that time, it was estimated that, in the best-case scenario, the maximum number of vaccine doses that could be produced globally was two billion.
    • The US alone negotiated and obtained the right to buy 600,000 doses. All the countries that negotiated pre-purchase orders were developed economies.
    • Only when the 2009 pandemic began to unwind and demand for a vaccine dropped did developed countries offer to donate vaccine doses to poorer economies.

    Issues with such nationalism

    • The most immediate effect of vaccine nationalism is that it further disadvantages countries with fewer resources and bargaining power.
    • It deprives populations in the Global South from timely access to vital public health goods.
    • Taken to its extreme, it allocates vaccines to moderately at-risk populations in wealthy countries over populations at higher risk in developing economies.
    • Vaccine nationalism also runs against the fundamental principles of vaccine development and global public health.

    Why it is unethical?

    • Most vaccine development projects involve several parties from multiple countries.
    • With modern vaccines, there are very few instances in which a single country can claim to be the sole developer of a vaccine.
    • And even if that were possible, global public health is borderless. As COVID-19 is illustrating, viruses can travel the globe.

    Its impacts

    • If COVID-19 vaccines are not made available affordably to those who need them, the consequences will likely be disproportionately severe for poorer or otherwise vulnerable and marginalised populations.
    • Without broad access to a vaccine, these populations will likely continue to suffer more than others, leading to unnecessary disease burden, continued economic problems and potential loss of life.

    Conclusion

    • Nationalism is at odds with global public health principles. Yet, there are no provisions in international laws that prevent pre-purchase agreements like the ones described above.
    • There is nothing inherently wrong with pre-purchase agreements of pharmaceutical products.
    • Vaccines typically do not generate as much in sales as other medical products.
    • If used correctly, pre-purchase agreements can even be an incentive for companies to manufacture vaccines that otherwise would not be commercialized.

    Way forward

    • Equity entails both, affordability of vaccines and access opportunities for populations across the world, irrespective of geography and geopolitics.
    • Contracts should not trump equitable access to global public health goods.
    • Developed countries should pledge to refrain from reserving vaccines for their populations during public health crises.
    • The WHO’s Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator is a starting point for countries to test collaborative approaches during the current pandemic.
    • International institutions — including the WHO — should coordinate negotiations ahead of the next pandemic to produce a framework for equitable access to vaccines during public health crises.
  • Discuss the importance of scientific temper, what kind of public culture is needed to advance it? 10 Marks

    Mentor’s comment-

    • In introduction  define what you understand by scientific temper.
    • In the body  first explain the role of science in life. You can answer such questions with suitable examples; from the article presented the best example is that of COVID-19. Explain that an unexpected outcome of COVID-19 is the growing awareness of how disease is transmitted and what might be done to prevent this; this is the rise of a good public culture in the country and it sets an example of growing scientific temper in the country. 
    •  Conclude by reasserting the importance of scientific temper and a culture that promotes and propagates it.
  • Discuss the possible role that behavioural economics can play in the fight against Covid-19. 10 Marks

    Mentor’s comment-

    • In introduction you have to briefly define what behavioral economics is.
    • In the body explain the following aspects in detail –  What is Behavioural Economics? How Behavioural Economics can be applied in the Indian context in the resolving the issues posed by the covid-19 pandemic?  Also explain the perceived costs – monetary, time and psychological costs . What are the limitations of Behavioural Economics? 
    • Conclude that Covid-19 is hitting humanity where it hurts in the most complex way — the human mind. Once we acknowledge the power of individual behaviour in epidemics, behavioural insights are not a choice but a necessity in our collective action against Covid-19.
  • Virtue is not about practicing morality, the greatest virtue is to be inclusive of all life. Comment.10 marks

    Mentor’s comment-

    • In the introduction you have to briefly explain what virtues are. 
    • In the body define “Inclusiveness”. Discuss that virtue is not just about practicing morality; explain this with example. Explain what makes it one of the biggest virtues that are quintessential to humankind. Such questions are best explained with illustrations.
    • You have to conclude by reasserting the significance of inclusivism as an important and significant virtue.