Civilsdaily

8PM – Nikaalo Prelims Revision Test Polity 1

Distribution:

Written by

Explains

in

Dear Students,

As a hint, please do revise topics like emergency provisions, fundamental rights. We are seeing questions on

Try to get over 12 questions correct in this test. 

[WpProQuiz 27]

 

Entire details of the program can be found here – 

Mission Nikaalo Prelims – Keep the Josh High > 60 Day Revision Course with Prelims Spotlight and Free Tests

Comments

13 responses to “8PM – Nikaalo Prelims Revision Test Polity 1”

  1. Jenice Goveas Avatar
    Jenice Goveas

    Dear Experts, query : Regarding Q20, motion for abolition or creation of Legislative Council is not deemed as an Amendment of the Constitution under Art 368 ONLY. However, it is still a Constitutional Amendment passed by simple majority. Please clarify

    1. Er S Avatar
      Er S

      Please make a note. In questions like these, we (and for that matter even UPSC) will not try to test the difference between an amendment to the constitution and CA under 368.
      Understanding the context is very important.

  2. Chetan Tiwary Avatar
    Chetan Tiwary

    Very nice ?

  3. Dr.Deepak Kansotiya Avatar
    Dr.Deepak Kansotiya

    Kindly clarify my doubt regarding 1935 act
    According to laxmikant public service commision was set up according 1919 act…It was union public service commission that was set up according to 1935 act…
    Thank you!

    1. Divya Murugesan Avatar
      Divya Murugesan

      Yes, you are correct. As per 1919 CPSC was set up and as per 1935, FPSC,PPSC and JPSC was set up.

      But please kindly refer to the Lesson “Salient features of the constitution” in the Laxmikant. Table3.4 sources of constitution at a glance. There you have the answer.

  4. Sandeep Kumar Avatar
    Sandeep Kumar

    Thanks for this, appreciate the efforts.

  5. Prashant Singh Avatar
    Prashant Singh

    A Very Prolific Initiative

  6. Divya Murugesan Avatar
    Divya Murugesan

    Q6. In Explanation you have mentioned UNTOUCHABILITY has not been defined anywhere in constitution but by an act of parliament. As per Laxmikant book, the term “UNTOUCHABILITY” has not been defined either in the constitution or in the act.

    Please clarify.

    1. Sajal Singh Avatar
      Sajal Singh

      Untouchability has been defined by the SC/ST act of 1989.Please read that.

    2. Divya Murugesan Avatar
      Divya Murugesan

      Thank you sir for the clarification.

  7. AADI THAKUR Avatar
    AADI THAKUR

    guys hw is there magazine combo…pls reviews?

  8. Sachin Tiwari Avatar
    Sachin Tiwari

    For Ques8. The amendments which are passed by the simple majority even if it makes small changes in the constitution it is not called as constitutional amendment . Isn’t it ?

    “The bills which result in some changes in the constitution but passed by simple majority are not deemed to be Constitution Amendments.”

    Then as per this the answer should be ‘D’ instead of ‘A’. i.e. “By a normal legislative process that does not require Constitutional Amendment. ”

    Please clarify as it will be a persistent confusion …

  9. मधुस्मिता पन्डा Avatar
    मधुस्मिता पन्डा

    Sir how I could find the answers with explanations of nikalo prelims queries

Leave a Reply

More posts