Mentor’s comment-
- https://www.thehindu.com/
opinion/lead/despite- arbitration-tug-of-war-mutual- settlement-is-key/ article33983317.ece - In the intro, briefly describe the purpose of bilateral investment treaties (BITs).
- In the body, briefly mention the basis of two cases and the Permanent Court of Arbitrations (PCAs) decision in the cases. In the next part, mention India’s position on sovereignty and the issue of honouring BITs. In the implications mention dent to the investors’ trust, breach of international treaty etc.
- Conclude by mentioning the need to honour the international treaties i.e. Bilateral Investment Treaties.
Comments
4 responses to “The Permanent Court of Arbitration decisions against India in the Vodafone and Cairn cases points to the necessity to rethink in India’s approach to the Bilateral Investment Treaties. In light of this, examine the issues with India’s stand its implications. 10 marks”
Payment ID – GhRhZNwOkwqcMH
Order No. – #0000396658
Hi Komal
First thing, refrain from monotonous answer, give proper headings and subheadings.
Avoid writing in paragraphs, fragment your content in points.
Issues and steps are discussed in a decent manner.
Good conclusion.
Content wise good attempt, work on presentation.
@Parth
please review
order no- #0000392548
Hi Surya
Good intro.
Content wise good attempt but try to summarise it, adhere to word limit.
Conclude in one paragraph only and give headings and subheadings.
Implications are discussed in a good manner.
Keep working hard.