💥UPSC 2026, 2027 UAP Mentorship - June Batch Starts

Q. 2) The federal model in Delhi is different from other states-Centre relations. Do you think it requires and any changes? (10 Marks)

“Mentor’s comment”

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/delhis-lame-duck-assembly/article35088142.ece?utm_source=op-ed&utm_medium=sticky_footer

-In the intro, mention recent amendment to GNCTD Act.
-In the body, mention that there is difference in Centre-State relation and Centre-Delhi relation. Next, mention how this difference leads to disputes between Centre and Delhi governmet. In the required changes you can mention giving more powers to Delhi government through amendment.
-Conclude by mentioning the consider amendment to address the issues.

Comments

20 responses to “Q. 2) The federal model in Delhi is different from other states-Centre relations. Do you think it requires and any changes? (10 Marks)”

  1. Utkarsha Yadav Avatar
    Utkarsha Yadav

    Please review
    Payment Id pay_HHWzC2O9xhkaqA

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Utkarsha

      Introduction is good. Then no need to trace the whole history, you can directly come to 69th amendment and Article 239AA.

      Table is good, amendments are also fine, then mention some consequences of the amendment act. Enormous powers to LG, concern regarding free speech in the assembly, inability of legislature to hold executive to account, committees rendered powerless etc

      Then write a way forward where you can mention 1-2 provisions of judgement, also need for consensus based approach, representative governance etc. Finally conclude.

      In this question focus should be more on what problems have risen due to amendment act and what are some probable solutions.

      Read some other answers. Keep writing.🙂

      4.5/10

  2. Fauzyia Jafri Avatar
    Fauzyia Jafri

    Please review
    Payment Idpay_HSaWe94YQ68p61

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Fauziya

      Introduction and background part are good.

      Then mention some of the consequences of this amendment act- Enormous powers to LG, concern regarding free speech in the assembly, inability of legislature to hold executive to account, committees rendered powerless, against cooperative federalism etc

      In way forward you can mention about the SC judgement and some of its provisions. The points you have written in way forward doesn’t add much value, you can avoid. Instead mention about need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc
      Also write a concluding statement.

      Read some other answers. Keep practicing. 🙂

  3. Vishal Nagle Avatar
    Vishal Nagle

    Ref id 422329

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Vishal,

      Introduction is fine, you can also mention about article 239AA. Difference between other states and Delhi is also fine.

      Then write about some provisions of the recent amendment and it’s consequences. You can’t restrict it to just a passing mention. Meaning of government you have mentioned. Add that LG’s concurrence is compulsory on any executive order, assembly shall not make any rule to enable itself or it’s committees to consider the matters of day to day administration etc

      Some of the consequences of this amendment act- Enormous powers to LG, concern regarding free speech in the assembly, inability of legislature to hold executive to account, committees rendered powerless, against cooperative federalism etc

      In way forward you can mention about the SC judgement in 2018 case and some of its provisions. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc

      Conclusion is fine.

      Read some more about the topic. Keep practicing.

  4. SUMITA DOWERAH Avatar
    SUMITA DOWERAH

    Payment Id: pay HFrdyJMOEZ9967. Please review, Sir.

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Sumita

      The act hass been passed, so you can frame the introduction better.

      After that no need to write so much, mention 69th amendment, article 239AA and some provisions. Make it concise and crisp. Mention about public order, police and land not under Delhi govt, CM appointed by president etc. Then mention some provisions of the recent amendment act. Government=LG,LG’s concurrence is compulsory on any executive order, assembly shall not make any rule to enable itself or it’s committees to consider the matters of day to day administration etc

      Then in disputes both points seem similar, you can club them, add some consequences of the recent amendment act- Enormous powers to LG, concern regarding free speech in the assembly, inability of legislature to hold executive to account, committees rendered powerless, against cooperative federalism etc

      In way forward, 1st point is actually a consequence of the amendment.2nd point is fine, mention about the SC judgement in 2018 here only. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc also can be added.

      Conclusion can be generic- need to uphold democratic principles etc

      Read some more about the topic. Content is lacking in this answer. Keep practicing. 🙂

  5. Mradul sharma Avatar
    Mradul sharma

    ref id- #0000422539

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Mradul

      Introduction is fine. After that no need to mention why Delhi is special in such detail, better mention HOW Delhi is different by mentioning some provisions of 69th constitutional amendment. You can mention about public order, police and land not under Delhi govt, CM appointed by president etc.

      In are changes needed section, after mentioning some provisions of the amendment act, mention some consequences- Enormous powers to LG, concern regarding free speech in the assembly, inability of legislature to hold executive to account, committees rendered powerless, against cooperative federalism etc

      You can write a separate way forward section, where you can mention about the SC judgement and its 1-2 provisions. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc also can be added.

      Conclusion is fine.

      Read some more about the topic. Keep practicing. 🙂

  6. Murari Jha Avatar
    Murari Jha

    UPI Reference No.-114715258066

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Murari

      Crux of the matter is what you have written. Answer holistically.

      Keep the introduction short by just mentioning that recently GNCTD(amendment) act has been passed.

      In the body part, mention 69th amendment, Article 239 AA. The n write points you have written regarding differences with other states.

      After that mention some provisions of the recent amendment act and it’s consequences. Some points you have written in introduction.

      Provisions- Government=LG,LG’s concurrence is compulsory on any executive order, assembly shall not make any rule to enable itself or it’s committees to consider the matters of day to day administration etc
      Consequences- Enormous powers to LG, concern regarding free speech in the assembly, inability of legislature to hold executive to account, committees rendered powerless, against cooperative federalism etc

      You can write a separate way forward section, where you can mention about the SC judgement in 2018 case and its 1-2 provisions. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc also can be added.

      Then conclude.

      Read some more about the topic. Keep practicing. 🙂

  7. Kartikey Singh Avatar
    Kartikey Singh

    pay_HHogiMPYpQ87sC

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Kartikey

      Delhi can’t be said to be a full state, so avoid using state in introduction. Also mention article 239AA mention that Delhi has an elected legislative assembly and government. Rest of the points that you have mentioned are good.

      Provisions of recent amendment Act are also fine, some corrections can be made for example concurrence of LG needed before any executive action, not ‘some’.

      In dispute section also mention about the consequences of this act-Enormous powers to LG, concern regarding free speech in the assembly, inability of legislature to hold executive to account, committees rendered powerless, against cooperative federalism etc

      Way forward is good. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc also can be added.

      Conclusion is fine.

      Keep practicing. 🙂

  8. Deepali Rajan Avatar
    Deepali Rajan

    Kindly review @swatantra sir
    Ref id 420326

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Deepali

      Nice attempt. Introduction and differences mentioned with other states are good. Points are fine, just mention 69th amendment Act, article 239AA etc

      Points regarding recent amendment act are also fine. However, you can mention a separate disputes section where you can mention the consequences of the act, also other points like constant bickering between LG and elected govt. etc

      You can write a separate way forward section, where you can mention about the SC judgement in 2018 case and its 1-2 provisions. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc also can be added.

      Then conclude.

      Structure of your answer is fine, just way forward part is missing.

      Keep practicing. 🙂

  9. Rajesh Reddy Avatar
    Rajesh Reddy

    Kindly review @Swatantra sir order no #0000422220

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Rajesh

      Very good attempt. Introduction is fine. Differences mentioned with other states are good.

      Key provisions and criticism of recent act are also fine. You can make criticism part more concise, use hub-spoke diagram.

      Write a separate way forward section, where you can also mention 1-2 provisions of the SC judgement. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc also can be added.

      Conclusion is good.

      Keep practicing. 🙂

      6.5/10

  10. ankita thakur Avatar
    ankita thakur

    Payment id-HJHAZEWKSzM3CX

    1. Swatantra Avatar
      Swatantra

      Ankita

      Decent attempt. Especially the provisions of the amendment act and it’s consequences part is very good.

      Introduction is also fine. In differences with other states, you can make a table. You can add some more points and it will improve presentation too.

      Write a separate way forward section, where you can also mention 1-2 provisions of the SC judgement in 2018 UoI vs NCT of Delhi case. Need of consensus based approach, representative governance etc also can be added.

      Conclusion is good.

      Read some other answers. Keep writing. 🙂

Leave a Reply

More posts