Q.2 Indiscriminate use of section 124-A of the IPC is like a saw in the hands of carpenter who cuts the entire forest instead of a tree. Has the Sedition law outlived its utility? Justify your answer. (10 Marks)

Mentor’s Comments-

  • Introduce the answer by explaining the meaning of sedition and why it faces criticism from some quarters.
  • In the body of the answer, discuss the reasons for reduced utility of the sedition law in the country.
  • In the next part of the body, discuss the significance of the sedition law. In last part of the body, present the case for balanced application of the sedition law.
  • Conclude the answer by emphasizing upon the need to exercise due restraint in the application of the sedition law.

Comments

7 responses to “Q.2 Indiscriminate use of section 124-A of the IPC is like a saw in the hands of carpenter who cuts the entire forest instead of a tree. Has the Sedition law outlived its utility? Justify your answer. (10 Marks)”

  1. abhishek mishra Avatar
    abhishek mishra

    Payment Idpay_KbP4ZbGolDMldc

  2. Arjun Sheoran Avatar
    Arjun Sheoran

    pay_KaRyPM2bJjqanb

  3. yogesh kotwal Avatar
    yogesh kotwal

    pay_KW7LKggRVu0G0H

  4. Anirudh Repala Avatar
    Anirudh Repala

    Pay_KaNUBqe9x9tIgg

  5. Pallab Banerjee Avatar
    Pallab Banerjee

    Payment id – KbDAF1tATt88eX

  6. Alankrit Srivastava Avatar
    Alankrit Srivastava

    Payment ID : #0000645504
    Staff @CD

  7. Rao Avatar
    Rao

    Razorpay Order Id: KaV0C7aA9qwW8k

Leave a Reply

More posts