Q.2 In the recent past, Parliament has passed quite a few bills whose constitutionality has been challenged by social sections affected by them. What are the implications of such challenges? Suggest the way forward. (10 Marks)

Comments

5 responses to “Q.2 In the recent past, Parliament has passed quite a few bills whose constitutionality has been challenged by social sections affected by them. What are the implications of such challenges? Suggest the way forward. (10 Marks)”

1. 

   December 2, 2021

   project _osiris

   Id0000486418

   Log in to Reply
   1. 

      December 5, 2021

      Staff @CD

      Hello

      Try to give relevant introduction..mention about the repeal of farm laws or increasing disruption of parliament in recent times..constitution-making is too basic to start with- it eats up both your word limit and space.
      Examples about repeal of laws is good but mention why are they being repealed- what are the issues with parliament functioning- by-passing of the select committee in the passing of most of the law, lack of deliberation, lack of coordination among the opposition etc
      Also mention a way forward on how to avoid this.
      Your answers are very superficial..need to build upon your content before writing…go through the article mentioned..read other answers too..address what the question is asking..go a bit into details..for example you have mentioned in way forward enable standardization(not clear what you mean by standardization); adequate legislature functioning(what steps need to be taken?)
      Keep practicing but also read a bit about issues before writing..otherwise it will become waste..you will have to reorient your content when you read the topic afterwards. 🙂
2. 

   December 2, 2021

   muskan garg

   payment ID- ISWBIERhKa7RvK

   Log in to Reply
   1. 

      December 5, 2021

      Staff @CD

      Muskan

      Introduction is good, instead of public better use the term ‘stakeholders’..public has already elected the government for making laws..so every time a referendum can’t be done..rather debate/discussion should be done in parliament itself which you can mention.
      After that constitutionality of agri-laws is not the demand of the question..you can avoid that part. Mention constitutionality not debated upon of various laws as one of the implications..court has to step in frequently.
      Problems mentioned are good..here you can also mention repeated adjournments(link with current- monsoon session); unruly opposition can be mentioned too
      Other points are good.
      Implications mentioned are fine too.
      Way forward is nice- especially examples from different countries, mention the need to address changes in anti-defection law to enhance the role of ruling party MPs, role of civil society.
      Conclusion is fine.
      Keep practicing. 🙂

      5.5/10
3. 

   December 6, 2021

   Shubham Chaurasiya

   pay id-IOgte1ONIGA20L

   Log in to Reply