💥UPSC 2026, 2027 UAP Mentorship - June Batch Starts

“Aristotelian and Buddhist ethics are alike formally: each advocates moderation”. Discuss. (15 Marks)

According to Aristotle Happiness exits in the rational exercise of the soul’s faculties in conformity with virtues such as courage, justice, temperance, benevolence, and prudence.

  • Aristotle argues that virtue is achieved by maintaining the Mean, which is the balance between the two excesses. Aristotle’s doctrine of the Mean is reminiscent of Buddha’s Middle Path.
  • Aristotle’s doctrine of virtue is “golden mean”. Courage, for example, is a mean regarding the feeling of fear, between the deficiency of rashness (too little fear) and the excess of cowardice (too much fear). Justice is a mean between getting or giving too much and getting or giving too little. Benevolence is a mean between giving to people who don’t deserve it and not giving to anyone at all.
  • Similarly Buddhism aims not to eradicate all feelings but to liberate it from its attachment to false values. He gave the concept of the Middle Way, a path between the extremes of religious asceticism and worldly self-indulgence to move away from false values.
  • Aristotle and the Buddha reached very similar conclusions as to how we should conduct our lives, if we wish to find happiness and fulfillment as human beings.
  • However, for Aristotle the mean was a method of achieving virtue, but for Buddha the
  • Middle Path referred to a peaceful way of life which negotiated the extremes of harsh asceticism and sensual pleasure seeking.

Comments

22 responses to ““Aristotelian and Buddhist ethics are alike formally: each advocates moderation”. Discuss. (15 Marks)”

  1. Shah Fahad Avatar
    Shah Fahad

    MOJO9828N00A10807750

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Good discussion.
      The length of the intro can be altered a bit.
      The content is decent and it all the necessary elements required in the discussion
      The structure is perfect.
      Good language

  2. Yogeshkumar Prajapati Avatar
    Yogeshkumar Prajapati

    Mojo id-MOJO9908R00A36163556

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Do not start answers in such a format.
      Briefly give intro regarding the demand of the question and then start the main body of the answer.
      The overall direction of the answer is weak and lacks depth.
      “Aristotelian and Buddhist ethics are alike formally: each advocate moderation.” This is the question. hence your points should be based on discussing the similarities in terms of “moderation”
      Your answer has to keep focus on Aristotle Mean and Buddha’s Middle Path
      Read the model answer.

  3. swetha K Avatar
    swetha K

    MOJO9930Q00N64198657

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Perfect balance in the answer.
      It is good that you discussed the differences as well.
      This will give credence to your whole answer while giving you an edge over others.
      Keep it up.
      Very good content all in all.
      The explanation is superb.
      The structure and direction are nice.

  4. SANU Avatar
    SANU

    Please Review…My payment id: MOJO9a31400N58094558

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Decent coverage.
      The content is very good.
      You have covered almost all the necessary arguments.
      But avoid large paragraphs based presentation.
      It should be short and crisp.
      The 2nd part of the answer is dealt with nicely.
      Good language

  5. Balakumaran Kand Avatar
    Balakumaran Kand

    MOJO9a31K00N58111047

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      A very good use of the ice cream example.
      Keep it up.
      The overall discussion is detailed and well explained.
      The content is good and language is decent.
      The structure of the answer is fine but you can also use the tabular form to discuss the similarities.

  6. Deepanshu Gulyani Avatar
    Deepanshu Gulyani

    MOJO9a02U00D28381180

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Good use of example in the middle of the answer
      All in all a very good discussion.
      The intro should be discussed in the bullet format.
      The content is decent and it all the necessary elements required in the discussion
      The structure is perfect.
      Good language

  7. VISHNU BHIMARJUN Avatar
    VISHNU BHIMARJUN

    MOJO9b10Y00D60723868

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Perfect balance in the answer.
      It is good that you discussed the differences as well.
      Very good content all in all.
      The explanation is superb.
      The structure and direction are nice.

  8. Divya Murugesan Avatar
    Divya Murugesan

    MOJO9b03K00A07920521

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      The content is very good.
      You have covered almost all the necessary arguments.
      Decent coverage.
      The discussion is short and crisp.
      The 2nd part of the answer is dealt with nicely.
      Good language

  9. sahithya kasiraju Avatar
    sahithya kasiraju

    Payment ID:MOJO9b01O00A90839766
    Please review

    1. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Good structuring in the answer.
      The overall content is decent.
      The explanation is perfect with decent language.
      The division of the content is very good and it has all the elements in it.
      All in all a decent attempt.

  10. siddhant singh parmar Avatar
    siddhant singh parmar

    MOJO9b04S00N25297271. Please review

    1. siddhant singh parmar Avatar
      siddhant singh parmar

      *UNCHECKED* @parth-verma1

    2. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      unchecked tag within 2 minutes!!! 😛

    3. Parth Verma Avatar
      Parth Verma

      Decent intro.
      Your discussion has covered almost all the necessary arguments.
      But avoid large statements. It should be short and crisp.
      The 2nd part of the answer is dealt with nicely.
      Good use of tabular form of discussion and presentation
      Good language