Category: Burning Issues

  • [Burning Issue] One Year since the Repeal of Art. 370

    Exactly a year back, on August 5, 2019, the government of India revoked the special status granted under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. The move was made on the promise of a better life for every Kashmiri in terms of social and economic parameters.

    So, with one year anniversary, it is the perfect opportunity to analyze what the move has meant for the common people. Did it bring them the development as promised? The article looks at some of the changes that the state has seen in the last 1 year, no judgments(promise!).

    Background

    Read the complete thread here at:

    [Burning Issue] Reorganization of Jammu and Kashmir

    Visible impacts of the move

    (Obviously, the impacts from the repeal of Article 370 cannot be studied in isolation from impacts of COVID in the region.)

    (A) Political Impacts

    The legal talk

    • The abrogation of special status has extended the reach of Parliament and Indian Constitution over the region in its entirety.
    • The reorganization appendix gives an insight to which former laws passed by the state have been retained, repealed, and which central laws have been extended:
    • Example: 164 laws – 153 state laws and 11 Governor’s Acts – have been repealed; 166 state laws have been retained; 7 state laws have been retained with amendments; 106 central laws have been made applicable.
    • The Right to Information Act, 2005 and the Representation of People Act, 1951 are among the laws being extended to the UT in entirety.

    New Domicile Rules

    • This year center came out with a new list of criteria for attaining domicile in J&K.
    • Since then, 4 lakh people in Jammu and Kashmir have been issued domicile certificates.
    • A significant proportion has been given out to those who despite living or serving in the state for years were not considered the residents of the state due to the provisions of Artice 35A, which now stands repealed.

    Reduction in Corruption

    • The CMS-India Corruption Study 2017 placed Jammu and Kashmir among the top corrupt states in India, stating that 84 per cent of the people surveyed perceived increased corruption in public services.
    • With corruption almost becoming second nature to the political elites and administrators, the immediate casualty in J&K has been effective governance and justice.
    • This has undermined the trust of the Kashmiris in democracy and shattered their faith in the legitimacy of the politico-administrative setup, posing a direct challenge to peace operations.
    • The situation has relieved(for now) since the abrogation of special status and paves the way for curbing corrupt practices.

    (B) Social Impacts

    Public perception of the move

    • The abrogation of autonomy without the consent of the Kashmiris has raised the threat perception among the people regarding their identity and culture.
    • The lost ‘autonomy’ and Art. 370 had a symbolic and emotional significance for Kashmir’s people.

    New Low in Education 

    • The continued shutdowns and internet blockade has severely affected college and university students and so has the digital learning.
    • College students and research scholars, for instance, have not been able to fill the online forms for competitive exams, scholarship grants and research papers.
    • Most of the hostels in Kashmir University are shut indefinitely.

    Rehabilitation of Kashmiri Pandits

    • Construction of 6,000 transit accommodations for accommodating 3000 Kashmiri migrants and 849 flats have been constructed so far.
    • The Centre also reimburses monthly cash relief to the eligible Kashmiri migrants settled in Jammu.
    • Since the year 2014, the monthly cash relief has been enhanced twice i.e. from Rs 6600/- per family to Rs 10,000/- per family in 2015 and to Rs 13,000/- per family in 2018.

    Era of social security measures

    • The government introduced an array of insurance schemes including the Atal Pension Yojana in the newly carved Union Territory.
    • The Centre also launched 85 people-oriented development schemes, like PM-KISAN, PM-KISAN-Pension, Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, and Stand-Up India in Jammu and Kashmir.

    (C) Economic Impact

    Agriculture

    • The apple industry in Kashmir, worth INR 80 billion which contributes 8 per cent of J&K’s GDP, has been worst affected.
    • The farmers have highlighted their troubles in selling the produce in the local APMCs.
    • Threats from militants, coupled with the government’s severe clampdown delayed the harvest for over a month, dealing a crippling blow to the industry during the peak harvest season.

    Industries

    • Core sectors of the economy of J&K have witnessed a steep decline after the abrogation of Article 370.
    • The communications blockade, curfews, and militant threats has taken a toll on the economy of Kashmir by INR 178.78 billion.
    • More than 90,000 jobs in the sectors of handicraft and information technology have been lost.

    Tourism

    • Tourism, which forms 8-10% of J&K’s GDP, is in shambles after the lockdown.
    • Less than 50,000 tourists visited the U.T. between August and December 2019.

    (D) Security Impacts

    • According to the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP), the lockdown and increase in Army presence led to a decrease in terrorism-related deaths.
    • Lesser fatalities: There has been a decrease in terrorism-related deaths.
    • Youth joining militancy: The number of local recruits has increased. In 2020, until March, 87.5% of the militants killed were locals according to SATP.
    • Border intrusion: Infiltration attempts along the LoC, however, remain high as Pakistan-based terrorist groups continue to try to send more militants in the Valley.
    • Reduced covert attacks: There have been fewer improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and grenade attacks this year.

    (E) Geopolitical Impacts

    • The abrogation of Article 370 has also led to the internationalization of the Kashmir conflict.
    • Dividing Ladakh from J&K has not only fulfilled the demands of the people of the region but also has sent a clear message to China that it is an integral part of India where Indian constitution holds despite China sometimes claiming it to be its own territory.
    • Visibly after that, we have witnessed the increased cases of transgression by the Chinese PLA in Ladakh.
    • UNSC has met two times for closed-door meetings on the situation in Kashmir.
    • Pakistan’s quest for garnering Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) support these days is quite prominent than earlier.

    Was Art. 370 the real problem?

    • Article 370, over the decades, was diluted many times but despite these dilutions, it bore great symbolic and psychological significance for Kashmiris.
    • It also displayed India’s asymmetric federalism, which granted differential rights to certain federal subunits, often in recognition of their distinctive ethnic identity.
    • For sure, the educational and health sectors in J&K should be have been improved but the reason for the underperformance of the educational and health sectors in Kashmir is not Article 370.
    • While private enterprises could set up industries in the former State on leased land, as they have over the years, acquisition of land by public sector enterprises from outside the State was never a problem.
    • Private investors do not set up shop in Kashmir due to militancy which is a product of an existing conflict; not because of Articles 370 or 35A.

    Way Forward

    (1) Building trust

    • The foremost challenge for New Delhi is rebuilding trust.
    • To rebuild the trust deficit and to win over the confidence of the Kashmiris, the government must immediately repeal the PSA – which should have become ultra vires, in the first place.
    • This will create a sense of oneness among the Kashmiris and will help change their perception towards New Delhi.

    (2) Addressing the distress 

    • Due attention must be given to address rural economic distress created after the unprecedented, unseasonal snowfall in November.
    • The government should compensate all the farmers with a farm credit or a loan waiver as it is done in other states.

    (3) Approaching with soft policies

    • New Delhi should ensure that the land’s pluralism is defended by assiduously handling the identity, cultural and religious issues.
    • In the present state of affairs, the political process is being hijacked and political leaders are under detention.
    • The release of the political class will send a positive signal.

    (4) Lifting the internet blackout

    • The government must immediately lift the internet blackout in all educational institutions.
    • Prolonging the internet curfew any longer will only alienate the students and the youth, who are already hurt and angered at the Centre’s unilateral action.

    (5) Resume educational institutions

    • Without any delay, the Centre must also announce the establishment of modern higher education institutions and IITs in its new UT.
    • Quality manpower is a prerequisite for the promised economic growth of the region.
    • Simultaneously, the Centre should actively help to restore regular functioning of closed educational institutions that have been shut since a year and equip them with all modern scientific facilities.
    • The Centre must also announce a new set of attractive scholarships for Kashmiri students.

    Conclusion

    Now is the time to renew ties with the region by initiating a series of serious and sincere interlocution measures to win over the confidence of the alienated population.

    It is necessary that focus on pressing local issues increases and we nurture new local leadership, so that, the grip of the political elite in the Valley loosens.

    Kashmir is known for its glorious past and it is high time that this glory returns to the valley.

     

  • [Burning Issue] National Education Policy 2020

    Distribution:
    Image Source: Finshots

    Seeking to completely overhaul India’s education system, the Union Ministry of Education, formerly known as the Human Resource Development Ministry, introduced the National Education Policy 2020. The set of reforms encompasses a whole range of ideas and promises, from vocational education through schools to higher studies.

    “Education is the passport to the future, for tomorrow belongs to those who prepare for it today.” – Malcolm X

    Backgrounder: Education Policies in India

    Education Policy lays particular emphasis on the development of the creative potential of each individual. It is based on the principle that education must develop not only cognitive capacities -both the ‘foundational capacities ‘of literacy and numeracy and ‘higher-order‘ cognitive capacities, such as critical thinking and problem-solving — but also social, ethical, and emotional capacities and dispositions.

    The implementation of previous policies on education has focused largely on issues of access and equity. The unfinished agenda of the National Policy on Education 1986, modified in 1992 (NPE 1986/92), is appropriately dealt with in this Policy. A major development since the last Policy of 1986/92 has been the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009 which laid down legal underpinnings for achieving universal elementary education.

    Evolution of Education Policy in India

    1. University Education Commission (1948-49)
    2. Secondary Education Commission (1952-53)
    3. Education Commission (1964-66) under Dr D. S. Kothari
    4. National Policy on Education, 1968
    5. 42nd Constitutional Amendment, 1976- Education in Concurrent List
    6. National Policy on Education (NPE), 1986
    7. NPE 1986 Modified in 1992 (Programme of Action, 1992)
    8. S.R. Subrahmanyam Committee Report (May 27, 2016)
    9. K. Kasturirangan Committee Report (May 31, 2019)

    Some of the major pathbreaking policies and their features:

    Earlier major Educational Policies

    (Year)

    Key Features

    1968

    • Based on the report and recommendations of the Kothari Commission (1964–1966)
    • India’s first National Policy which called for a “radical restructuring” and proposed equal educational opportunities
    • It gave the “three-language formula” to be implemented in secondary education

    1986

    • Introduced under Rajiv Gandhi’s Prime Ministership, expected to spend 6% of GDP on education for the 1st time
    • It called for “special emphasis on the removal of disparities and to equalize educational opportunity”
    • It called for a “child-centered approach” in primary education, and launched “Operation Blackboard
    • Also called for the creation of the “rural university” model, based on the philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi

    1992

     

    • 1986 Policy modified in 1992 by the P.V. Narasimha Rao government
    • It laid down a Three – Exam Scheme: JEE/AIEEE/State EEE (Engineering Entrance Exam)

     

     The National Education Policy, 2020

    • It marks the fourth major policy initiative in education since Independence.
    • The last one has undertaken a good 34 years ago and modified in 1992.
    • Based on two committee reports and extensive nationwide consultations, NEP 2020 is sweeping in its vision and seeks to address the entire gamut of education from preschool to doctoral studies, and from professional degrees to vocational training.

    Features of the 2020 policy:

    1) Languages

    • A perfect mix: The policy raises the importance of mother tongue and regional languages; medium of instruction until class 5 and preferably beyond should be in these languages. Sanskrit and foreign languages will also be given emphasis.
    • No compulsion: The policy also states that no language will be imposed on the students.
    • More to clarify: The government clarified that the language policy in NEP is a broad guideline; and that it is up to the states, institutions and schools to decide the implementation.

    2) School education

    • New structure of schooling: The “10 + 2” structure will be replaced with “5+3+3+4”.
    • Reforms in the exam: Instead of exams being held every academic year, school students will only answer three exams, in classes 3, 5 and 8.
    • Novel assessment by PARAKH: Board exams will be continued to be held for classes 10 and 12 but will be re-designed. Standards for this will be established by an assessment body PARAKH.
    • Report cards will be “holistic”, offering information about the student’s skills.
    • Inter-disciplinary approach: This policy aims at reducing the curriculum load of students and allowing them to be more “inter-disciplinary” and “multi-lingual”.
    • One example given was “If a student wants to pursue fashion studies with physics, or if one wants to learn bakery with chemistry, they’ll be allowed to do so.”
    • Software coding: Coding will be introduced from class 6 and experiential learning will be adopted.
    • The Midday Meal Scheme will be extended to include breakfasts. More focus will be given to students’ health, particularly mental health, through the deployment of counsellors and social workers.

    3) Higher education

    • Revamped UG/PG courses: It proposes a multi-disciplinary bachelors degree in an undergraduate programme with multiple exit options.
    • MPhil (Masters of Philosophy) courses are to be discontinued to align degree education with how it is in Western models.
    • Increasing GER: A Higher Education Council of India (HECI) will be set up to regulate higher education. The Council’s goal will be to increase the gross enrollment ratio.
    • The HECI will have three verticals: National Higher Education Regulatory Council (NHERC), to regulate higher education, including teacher education, while excluding medical and legal education; the National Accreditation Council (NAC), a “meta-accrediting body”; and the Higher Education Grants Council (HEGC), for funding and financing of universities and colleges.
    • This will replace the existing National Council for Teacher Education, All India Council for Technical Education and the University Grants Commission.
    • The National Testing Agency will now be given the additional responsibility of conducting entrance examinations for admissions to universities across the country, in addition to the JEE Main and NEET.
    • The policy proposes to internationalize education in India. Foreign universities can now set up campuses in India.

    3) Teacher education

    • The NEP 2020 puts forward many policy changes when it comes to teachers and teacher education.
    • To become a teacher, a 4 year Bachelor of Education will be the minimum requirement needed by 2030.
    • The teacher recruitment process will also be strengthened and made transparent.
    • The National Council for Teacher Education will frame a National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education by 2021 and a National Professional Standards for Teachers by 2022.

    4) Other changes

    Under NEP 2020, numerous new educational institutes, bodies and concepts have been given legislative permission to be formed. This includes:

    • National Education Commission, headed by the PM of India
    • Academic Bank of Credit, a digital storage of credits earned to help resume education by utilising credits for further education
    • National Research Foundation, to improve research and innovation
    • Special Education Zones, to focus on the education of underrepresented group in disadvantaged regions
    • Gender Inclusion Fund, for assisting the nation in the education of female and transgender children
    • National Educational Technology Forum, a platform to facilitate the exchange of ideas on the technology used to improve learning

    The policy proposes new language institutions such as the Indian Institute of Translation and Interpretation and the National Institute/ Institutes for Pali, Persian and Prakrit. Other bodies proposed include the National Mission for Mentoring, National Book Promotion Policy, National Mission on Foundational Literacy and Numeracy.

    Regulatory cholesterol is the bane of governance in India, with poor outcomes to boot.

    An analysis: Hits and misses of the Policy

    NEP 2020 is an amalgamation of need-based policy, cutting-edge research and best practices, paving the way for New India.

    1) Targets ‘Antyodaya’

    With an extensive focus on universalizing access from early childhood to higher education, integrating over two crore out-of-school children, and concerted efforts directed at socio-economically disadvantaged groups, the policy ensures last-mile delivery, embodying “Antyodaya”.

    2) A revamped curriculum

    • Through a convergence of efforts and erasing traditional silos in workflows, early childhood care and education will be delivered through a new curriculum as well as a play- and activity-based pedagogy.
    • Along with a dedicated national mission for foundational literacy and numeracy, NEP 2020 will be significant for bolstering the most critical phases of learning, building a strong foundation for education.

    3) Departure from the ‘old’ school

    • NEP marks a departure from archaic practices and pedagogy.
    • Revamped curriculum, adult education, lifelong learning and the vision to ensure that half our learners have exposure to at least one vocational skill in the next five years is characteristic of the shift from rote to applied learning.
    • Through a skill gap analysis, practice-based curriculum and internships with local vocational experts, NEP 2020’s “Lok Vidya”, echoes the PM’s clarion call of being “Vocal for Local”.

    4) An evidence-based policy

    • With the NITI Aayog’s mandate to facilitate evidence-based policy, there is a strong belief in the fact that what can’t be measured can’t be improved.
    • Till date, India lacks a comprehensive system for regular, credible and comparable assessments of learning outcomes.
    • The MoHRD undertook a rigorous consultation process in formulating the draft policy – “Over two lakh suggestions from 2.5 lakh gram panchayats, 6,600 blocks, 6,000 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), 676 districts were received.

    5) Focus on Teacher’s skilling

    • Teacher education is reimagined with a comprehensive curricular framework, multidisciplinary programmes and stringent action against substandard institutions.
    • Driven by SEQI’s vision for teacher adequacy and transparent systems for merit-based selection and deployment, online systems for teacher transfers and planning will ensure that the right teachers are in the right institutes.

    6) Academic credit bank

    • The creation of an academic credit bank, the impetus to research, graded autonomy, internationalization and the development of special economic zones are vital to rebranding India as the higher education destination.
    • Further, multilingual education and efforts to enhance the knowledge of India could restore the country’s educational heritage from the glory days of Takshashila and Nalanda — creating a system that’s modern yet rooted.

    7) Departure from over-regulation

    • NEP 2020 makes a bold prescription to free our schools, colleges and universities from periodic “inspections” and place them on the path of self-assessment and voluntary declaration.
    • Transparency, maintaining quality standards and a favourable public perception will become a 24X7 pursuit for the institutions, leading to all-round improvement in their standard.
    • A single, lean body with four verticals for standards-setting, funding, accreditation and regulation is proposed to provide “light but tight” oversight.

    8) Getting a job-ready generation

    • With the new policy coming in picture, the school and college education will not only be seen as a facilitator of degree but it will be treated as a medium to build personality and it’ll help the students in their holistic professional growth.
    • The flexibility and autonomy now presented to the future workforce will enable them to explore a variety of options and build more relevant and in-demand skills rather than following traditional career paths.

    9) Sweeping in vision

    • Based on two committee reports and extensive nationwide consultations, NEP 2020 is sweeping in its vision.
    • It seeks to address the entire gamut of education from preschool to doctoral studies, and from professional degrees to vocational training.
    • It acknowledges the 21st century need for mobility, flexibility, alternate pathways to learning, and self-actualization.

    Issues with the policy

    The new policy has tried to please all, and the layers are clearly visible in the document. It says all the right things and tries to cover all bases, often slipping off keel.

    1) Lack of integration

    • In both the thinking, and in the document, there are lags, such as the integration of technology and pedagogy.
    • There are big gaps such as lifelong learning, which should have been a key element of upgrading to emerging sciences.

    2) Language barrier

    • There is much in the document ripe for debate – such as language. The NEP seeks to enable home language learning up to class five, in order to improve learning outcomes.
    • Sure, early comprehension of concepts is better in the home language and is critical for future progress. If the foundations are not sound, learning suffers, even with the best of teaching and infrastructure.
    • But it is also true that a core goal of education is social and economic mobility, and the language of mobility in India is English.

    3) Multilingualism debate

    • Home language succeeds in places where the ecosystem extends all the way through higher education and into employment. Without such an ecosystem in place, this may not be good enough.
    • The NEP speaks of multilingualism and that must be emphasised. Most classes in India are de facto bilingual.
    • Some states are blissfully considering this policy as a futile attempt to impose Hindi.

    4) Lack of funds

    • According to Economic Survey 2019-2020, the public spending (by the Centre and the State) on education was 3.1% of the GDP.
    • A shift in the cost structure of education is inevitable.
    • While funding at 6% of GDP remains doubtful, it is possible that parts of the transformation are achievable at a lower cost for greater scale.

    5) A move in haste

    • The country is grappled with months of COVID-induced lockdowns.
    • The policy had to have parliamentary discussions; it should have undergone a decent parliamentary debate and deliberations considering diverse opinions.

    6) Overambitious

    • All aforesaid policy moves require enormous resources. An ambitious target of public spending at 6% of GDP has been set.
    • This is certainly a tall order, given the current tax-to-GDP ratio and competing claims on the national exchequer of healthcare, national security and other key sectors.
    • The exchequer itself is choked meeting the current expenditure.

    7) Pedagogical limitations

    • The document talks about flexibility, choice, experimentation. In higher education, the document recognizes that there is a diversity of pedagogical needs.
    • If it is a mandated option within single institutions, this will be a disaster, since structuring a curriculum for a classroom that has both one-year diploma students and four-year degree students’ takes away from the identity of the institution.

    8) Institutional limitations

    • A healthy education system will comprise of a diversity of institutions, not a forced multi-disciplinarily one.
    • Students should have a choice for different kinds of institutions.
    • The policy risks creating a new kind of institutional isomorphism mandated from the Centre.

    9) Issues with examinations

    • Exams are neurotic experiences because of competition; the consequences of a slight slip in performance are huge in terms of opportunities.
    • So the answer to the exam conundrum lies in the structure of opportunity. India is far from that condition.
    • This will require a less unequal society both in terms of access to quality institutions, and income differentials consequent upon access to those institutions.

     Making it happen: Way Forward

    This ambitious policy has a cost to be paid and the rest of the things dwells on its implementation in letter and spirit.

    Public investment is considered extremely critical for achieving the high-quality and equitable public education system as envisaged by the policy, that is truly needed for India’s future economic, social, cultural, intellectual and technological progress and growth.

    • Implementation of the spirit and intent of the Policy is the most critical matter.
    • It is important to implement the policy initiatives in a phased manner, as each policy point has several steps, each of which requires the previous step to be implemented successfully.
    • Prioritization will be important in ensuring optimal sequencing of policy points, and that the most critical and urgent actions are taken up first, thereby enabling a strong base.
    • Next, comprehensiveness in implementation will be key; as this Policy is interconnected and holistic, only a full-fledged implementation, and not a piecemeal one, will ensure that the desired objectives are achieved.
    • Since education is a concurrent subject, it will need careful planning, joint monitoring, and collaborative implementation between the Centre and States.
    • Timely infusion of requisite resources – human, infrastructural, and financial – at the Central and State levels will be crucial for the satisfactory execution of the Policy.
    • Finally, careful analysis and review of the linkages between multiple parallel implementation steps will be necessary in order to ensure effective dovetailing of all initiatives.

    Conclusion

    India’s political economy has simply not made quality education a top priority. What has changed in the last couple of decades is the explosion of aspiration and demand for education. But that demand has yet to be channelized into institutional change.

    Its’ too early to judge

    • This policy is an ambitious and complex document and it has been adopted during a pandemic and a lockdown, which renders discussion and debate difficult.
    • It lays down a roadmap for the next two decades. But, there are many reasons why this policy needs close scrutiny, a full debate, for what it says and what it doesn’t.
    • For instance, what are its implications for the majority of those covered under the acronym SEDGs (Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Groups) in the text?
    • This is particularly crucial as the document visualizes increased “benign” privatization of education, attempting to distinguish this from commercialization.
    • In a situation of growing privatization and the near-collapse of public institutions of higher education, how these policies will be implemented is a matter of concern.

    There is no getting away from the need for a highway and device access for all, to enable the future of learning. The NEP is but one step towards freedom in education. So much, including the concepts of synchronous learning, of batch-processing and of provision as patronage is gone and we must embrace the change.

     


    References

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/pib-highlights-of-the-national-education-policy-nep-2020/

    https://thediplomat.com/2020/07/indias-new-education-policy-streams-merge-into-a-river/

    https://www.bloombergquint.com/opinion/national-education-policy-the-hits-and-misses

    https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/national-education-policy-niti-aayog-6536524/

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/an-education-policy-that-is-sweeping-in-its-vision/article32233396.ece

  • [Burning Issue] Disputes over Anti-Defection Law

    A CM takes oath at 4 am in the morning. MLAs are taken to an unknown destination or a resort with their mobiles and all communications virtually shut! Likewsie, if unconstitutional principles and practices no longer excite the citizens, but some political norms do, then our democracy is in trouble.

    Turbulence in governments — involving the “switching of sides” by elected representatives — has been increasingly frequent in recent months.  The ongoing political crisis in Rajasthan is neither new nor uncommon.  The past year has seen the toppling of two state governments in Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh amid allegations of political defections and horse-trading. There has also been turmoil in Goa and Manipur.

    Over the debate: The Anti-Defection Law

    The Anti-Defection Law under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution punishes MPs/ MLAs for defecting from their party by taking away their membership of the legislature. It gives the Speaker of the legislature the power to decide the outcome of defection proceedings.

    • The anti-defection law was added to the Constitution through the Fifty-Second (Amendment) Act, 1985 when Rajiv Gandhi was PM.
    • It lays down the process by which legislators may be disqualified on grounds of defection by the Presiding Officer of a legislature based on a petition by any other member of the House.
    • A legislator is deemed to have defected if he either voluntarily gives up the membership of his party or disobeys the directives of the party leadership on a vote.
    • This implies that a legislator defying (abstaining or voting against) the party whip on any issue can lose his membership of the House.
    • The law applies to both Parliament and state assemblies.

    Exceptions under the law

    • Legislators may change their party without the risk of disqualification in certain circumstances.
    • The law allows a party to merge with or into another party provided that at least two-thirds of its legislators are in favor of the merger.
    • In such a scenario, neither the members who decide to merge nor the ones who stay with the original party will face disqualification.

    To get more details on the evolution of the act, tap here:

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/explained-anti-defection-law-and-its-evolution/

    Issues with the Anti-defection cases these days

    • Generally, when doubts are cast on the CM that he has lost the majority, the opposition and the Governor would rally for a floor test.
    • Now, this may seem like an administrative act. But loopholes around the law has brought politics into the picture. Let us understand the various ground situations involved:

    1) Defection proceeding

    • A Supreme Court Bench is scheduled to hear an appeal filed by the Rajasthan Assembly Speaker’s office challenging the State High Court order to defer anti-defection proceedings against former Deputy CM.
    • The petition said the HC has crossed its jurisdiction by asking the Speaker to put off his decision on the disqualification notices issued to dissident MLAs.
    • The High Court’s interim order granting extended time to rebel MLAs to file their replies to anti-defection notices amounted to a violation of Article 212 (courts not to inquire into the proceedings of the legislature).
    • The petition said that judicial review of ongoing anti-defection proceedings was limited.
    • The petition referred to the Constitution Bench judgment of the top court in the Kihoto Hollohan case in 1992 in this context.
    • Judicial review cannot be available at a stage prior to the making of a decision by the Speaker/Chairman and a prior action would not be permissible.
    • Nor would interference be permissible at an interlocutory stage of the proceedings, the verdict says.

    2) Summoning the house

    Rajasthan Governor returning the fresh proposal by the state Cabinet – seeking to convene a session of the Assembly has raised fresh legal questions on the powers of the Governor. But a Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court has held that a Governor is bound to convene a meeting of the Assembly for a floor test on the recommendation of the Cabinet.

    • Article 174 of the Constitution gives the Governor the power to summon from time to time “the House or each House of the Legislature of the State to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit…”
    • However, the phrase “as he thinks fit” is read as per Article 163 of the Constitution which says that the Governor acts on the aid and advice of the cabinet.
    • Article 163(1) essentially limits any discretionary power of the Governor only to cases where the Constitution expressly specifies that the Governor must act on his own and apply an independent mind.
    • The Supreme Court in Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs Deputy Speaker (2016) expressly said that the power to summon the House is not solely vested in the Governor.
    • The court has highlighted that Article 163 of the Constitution does not give the Governor a “general discretionary power to act against or without the advice of his Council of Ministers.
    • The discretionary powers are limited to specified areas like giving assent or withholding/referring a Bill to the President or appointment of a CM or dismissal of a government that has lost confidence but refuses to quit, etc.

    3) Floor test

    • Now, we know that the Governor cannot refuse the request of the Cabinet to call for a sitting of the House for legislative purposes or for the chief minister to prove his majority.
    • In fact, on numerous occasions, including in the 2016 Uttarakhand case, the court has clarified that when the majority of the ruling party is in question, a floor test must be conducted at the earliest available opportunity.
    • In 2016, the Supreme Court in Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs Deputy Speaker expressly said that the power to summon the House is not solely vested in the Governor.

    4) Time Limit for defection plea

    • The Anti-defection law does not specify a time period for the Presiding Officer to decide on a disqualification plea.
    • Given that courts can intervene only after the Presiding Officer has decided on the matter, the petitioner seeking disqualification has no option but to wait for this decision to be made.

    5) Deciding on merger or split

    • The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution prohibits defection to protect the stability of governments but does not prohibit mergers.
    • Paragraph 4(2) of the Tenth Schedule, dealing with mergers, says that only when two-thirds of the members agree to “merge” the party would they be exempt from disqualification.
    • The “merger” referred to in Paragraph 4(2) is seen as a legal fiction, where members are deemed to have merged for the purposes of being exempt from disqualification, rather than a merger in the true sense.
    • Major political parties argue that a state unit of a national party cannot be merged without the party being merged at the national level.
    • However, the Tenth Schedule identifies this dichotomy between state units and national units.
    • As per Paragraph 4(2), “merger” of a party means merger of a legislative party of that House and not the national party.

    Yet another feature: ‘Resort’ Politics

    • The sight of legislators being packed off in luxury buses, and lodged in comfortable, even luxurious, hotels and resorts, has become a common feature of Indian politics.
    • It usually happens when a state government is in crisis, when a crucial election for a Rajya Sabha seat is underway and numbers are fluid, or when a rebellion is underway to change the regime in a state.
    • A political party — or the rebel faction — then rushes to consolidate the legislators who are in its favour.
    • The objective is to ensure that these legislators don’t succumb to temptations and inducements offered by the other side, and instead, remain under constant surveillance.
    • The method then adopted is to lock them in, till the crisis is resolved one way or the other.

    What we can learn from the ongoing situation?

    As recent events have made clear, however, the Tenth Schedule is no longer an effective check on the phenomenon of defection, and an urgent reconsideration is required. There are a few reasons why this is so.

    1)  Loopholes are present in the law itself

    • The first is that the defecting MLAs have found a way around the restrictions in the Tenth Schedule.
    • Instead of formally “crossing the floor” or voting against their party in a confidence motion, they resign from the party.
    • This brings down the party’s strength in the House, and the government is toppled.
    • A few months later, when by-elections are held, the same MLAs then stand for election on the ticket of the opposition party and are returned to the assembly.

    2) Judiciary can ‘conditionally’ intervene

    • Unfortunately, in their recent judgments, the courts have failed to stop defection practices (although, arguably, the language of the Tenth Schedule does not leave much room to the judiciary).
    • No matter how well-drafted a constitutional provision is, ultimately, its implementation depends upon constitutional functionaries acting in good faith.
    • As BR Ambedkar pointed out soon after the framing of the Constitution, every constitutional text can be subverted if those charged with running the affairs of government are inclined to do so.

    3) Political commitment is under question

    • In recent times, it has become clear that the major constitutional actors involved in times of constitutional instability — i.e., the governors and the speakers — do not act in good faith.
    • In every constitutional crisis over the last few years, governors/speakers have acted like partisan representatives of the political party that appointed them, and have flouted constitutional conventions with impunity.
    • Instances include decisions regarding which party to call first to form the government in a hung house, to order — or refusing to order — floor tests to prove majorities.

    4) Horse-trading persists in Indian politics

    • More recently, the Rajasthan High Court effectively injuncted the Speaker of the Rajasthan Assembly from acting upon disqualification notices, despite clear SC precedent to the contrary.
    • It can be pointed out that horse-trading of legislators persists.
    • It has been widely reported that huge sums of money are offered to MLAs to desert their parties and bring down the government.

    5) Role of Legislators is being compromised

    • The anti-defection law has restrained legislators from effectively carrying out their functions.
    • In a parliamentary system, legislators are expected to exercise their independent judgement while determining their position on an issue.
    • The choice of the member may be based on a combination of public interest, constituency interests, and party affiliations.
    • This fundamental freedom of choice could be undermined if the member is mandated to vote along the party line on every Bill or motion.

    6) Accountability of the government is compromised

    • The anti-defection law deters legislators from holding the government accountable for its actions.
    • One of the key features of parliamentary democracy is that the government is accountable for its decisions.
    • However, the anti-defection law deters a legislator from his duty to hold the government accountable, by requiring him to follow the instruction of the party/coalition on almost every decision.

    7) Overall decision making is hindered

    • The anti-defection law leads to major decisions in the legislature being taken by a few party leaders and not by the larger body of legislators.
    • This implies that anyone who controls the party leadership can issue directions to all legislators.
    • Thus, voting in the House will be as per the wishes of a few party leaders/ coalition leader rather than the beliefs of all legislators or the need for urgency.
    • Consensus if often dictated against which democratization within political parties is sought.

    8) Clueless voters are the ultimate losers

    • The anti-defection law breaks the chain of accountability between elected representatives and the voter.
    • The legislator would have to justify his decision if he differs from such a view.
    • If he dissented from the party line, he would lose his seat and would be unable to work for the citizens’ interests on other issues.
    • This further reduces the accountability of elected representatives to citizens.

    Way Forward

    In sum, therefore, the anti-defection law needs to be improved than repealed.

    Over the years, several amendments/recommendations have also been suggested to reform various aspects of the law.  Let’s consider some of them:

    Sources: Law Commission, 1999; National Constitution Review Commission, 2002; Law Commission Report, 2015; Law Commission Draft Report, 2018; Dinesh Goswami Committee on electoral reforms, 1990, Halim Committee on anti-defection law, 1998 (from R. Kothandaraman Ideas for an alternative Anti-Defection law, 2006); PRS

    Conclusion

    We must know that politics has a way of getting ahead of principles and practices, and establishing its own norms. It is important to understand how this growing pattern makes a mockery of Indian democracy, speaks poorly of elected representatives and is an insult to the voter.

    Need of the hour is complete revamp of the anti-defection law. As Gandhiji, would put it ‘Politics without principle’, is a sin which should be avoided in all case.

     


    References

    https://www.prsindia.org/sites/default/files/parliament_or_policy_pdfs/Anti-Defection%20Law%20Intent%20and%20Impact_0.pdf

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/story/anti-defection-law/

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/explained-anti-defection-law-and-its-evolution/

    https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/why-the-anti-defection-law-has-failed-to-deliver/story-JtDhlEFHZ8VPpnNBD7Fv9J.html

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/getting-ahead-of-constitutional-practices/article32233269.ece

     

  • [Burning Issues] Geopolitics and the roll-out of 5G

    5G Technology is the future of the telecom sector. Research and development in this field have attracted global giants. But the rollout of 5G network has also caught the eyes of various governments. This is because 5G is not just a matter of cellular network but has security implications for nations and scope for dominance over the future technological era. And the latest US steps against Huawei is a testimony to this fact.

    The Global 5G Conundrum

    • Nearly a decade ago a report by the US House Intelligence Committee flagged issues posed by Chinese telecom companies Huawei Technologies and ZTE.
    • This issue now has evolved into a full-scale duel between the two global technology powerhouses, which now threatens to draw in the entire world.
    • Soon after the US, Britain announced its ban on equipment from Huawei into the country’s high-speed wireless network.
    • Australia banned Huawei long back from supplying equipment for a 5G mobile network in 2018.
    • India along with Canada and some other countries is reviewing security implications and has yet to decide on allowing Huawei to provide equipment for them.
    • Meanwhile, Huawei has cut its India revenue target for 2020 by up to 50% and is laying off more than half of its staff in the country.
    But before we take the geopolitics route, let us first understand the potential 5G Technology holds

    5G Technology: A Perspective

    In telecommunications, 5G is the fifth generation technology standard for cellular networks, which cellular phone companies began deploying worldwide since 2019, the planned successor to the 4G networks which provide connectivity to most current cellphones.

    All 5G wireless devices in a cell are connected to the Internet and telephone network by radio waves through a local antenna in the cell. The main advantage of the 5G network is that it will have greater bandwidth, giving higher download speeds, eventually up to 10 gigabits per second.

    5G enables a new kind of network that is designed to connect virtually everyone and everything together including machines, objects, and devices and also will make possible new applications in IoT and machine to machine areas.

    The previous generations of mobile networks are 1G, 2G, 3G, and 4G:

    First-generation – 1G
    1980s: 1G delivered analogue voice.

    Second-generation – 2G
    Early 1990s: 2G introduced digital voice (e.g. CDMA- Code Division Multiple Access).

    Third generation – 3G
    Early 2000s: 3G brought mobile data (e.g. CDMA2000).

    Fourth-generation – 4G LTE
    2010s: 4G LTE ushered in the era of mobile broadband.

    Benefits of 5G over 4G

    1) 5G uses spectrum better than 4G

    • 5G is also designed to get the most out of every bit of spectrum across a wide array of available spectrum regulatory paradigms and bands—from low bands below 1 GHz to mid bands from 1 GHz to 6 GHz to high bands known as millimetre wave (mmWave).

    2) 5G is faster than 4G

    • 5G can be significantly faster than 4G, delivering up to 20 Gbps peak data rates and 100+ Mbps average data rates.

    3) 5G has more capacity than 4G

    • 5G is designed to support a 100x increase in traffic capacity and network efficiency.

    4) 5G has lower latency than 4G

    • Latency is the time a device takes to communicate with the network, which stands at an average of up to 50 milliseconds for 4G networks across the world.
    • 5G has significantly lower latency to deliver more instantaneous, real-time access: a 10x decrease in end-to-end latency down to 1ms.

    Applications of 5G technology

    High-Speed mobile network: 5G will revolutionize the mobile experience with the supercharged wireless network. Compared to conventional mobile transmission technologies, voice and high-speed data can be simultaneously transferred efficiently in 5G

    Entertainment and multimedia: 5G can provide 120 frames per second, high resolution and higher dynamic range video streaming without interruption. The audiovisual experience will be rewritten after the implementation of the latest technologies powered by 5G wireless. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality services will be better experienced over 5G.

    Internet of Things: IoT applications collect a huge amount of data from millions of devices and sensors and thus requires an efficient network for data collection, processing, transmission, control and real-time analytics which 5G network is a better candidate.

    Smart cities: Smart city application like traffic management, Instant weather update, local area broadcasting, energy management, smart power grid, smart lighting of the street, water resource management, crowd management, emergency response etc can use a reliable 5G wireless network for its functioning.

    Smart farming: 5G technology will be used for agriculture and smart farming in the future. Using smart RFID sensors and GPS technology, farmers can track the location of livestock and manage them easily. Smart sensors can be used for irrigation control, access control and energy management.

    Mission-critical applications: Like telemedicine services, remote control of critical infrastructure and vehicles. It has the potential to transform industries with highly reliable, low latency link.

    Back to Huawei-US tussle

    The PLA’s Huawei

    • Started in the late 1980s by a former Deputy Regimental Chief in the People’s Liberation Army, Huawei has come a long way from being a reseller of switches imported from Hong Kong.
    • Huawei went on to sell its products and services in more than 170 countries, blitzing past Ericsson as the largest telecoms equipment manufacturer in the world in 2012.
    • It overtook Apple as the world’s second-largest manufacturer of smartphones in 2018 and had annual revenue of $122 billion and some 194,000 employees last year.

    Issues with Huawei

    • Huawei has faced criticism for various aspects of its operations, with its most prominent controversies having involved U.S. allegations of its products containing backdoors for Chinese government espionage.
    • In February 2011, Huawei published an open letter to the US government denying the security concerns raised about the company or its equipment, and requesting a full investigation into its corporate operations.
    • In response, an investigation began in November 2011 into “the counterintelligence and security threat posed by Chinese telecommunications companies doing business in the US”.
    • In its report submitted in 2012, the US House panel noted that Huawei and ZTE cannot be trusted to be free of foreign state influence and thus pose a security threat.

    A technological Cold War

    • The US Federal Communications Commission has designated these two companies as national security threats.
    • Thus, it blockaded Huawei on the ground that its equipment is designed to aid snooping and would make American telecoms players dependent on subsidised Chinese technology.
    • Most observers see this as a ‘technological cold war’ that could extend beyond just the US and China, and compel other countries, including India, to effectively choose between one camp and the other.
    • It is being described as a geopolitical struggle over technology that threatens to divide the world into two distinct technological blocs, with both countries striving to limit the other’s access to its advanced know-how.
    • The question is whether countries think the risks are high enough to dump a cheaper, viable option.
    • For China, the action has come at a time when 5G is set to be rolled out globally, with Huawei generally ahead in the race.

    India and Huawei

    • In December 2019, Huawei was tentatively admitted into 5G trials in India.
    • As part of the trial plan, the government had decided that telecom players would be allocated special airwaves for a brief period for the 5G trials.
    • Huawei entered the fray with Vodafone Idea and Bharti Airtel while BSNL joined hands with ZTE.
    • But the 5G trials could not take off due to the Covid-19 outbreak. Then came the Chinese hostility in Ladakh that seems to have turned the tide.

    Where does India stand in this battle?

    • Back in December 2009, the Department of Telecom (DoT) had asked Indian mobile companies to suspend deals with Chinese equipment amid fears that Chinese equipment was being used for hacking and spying.
    • But India has been a fence-sitter since then — and has never fully banned Chinese companies from its telecom equipment industry.
    • Indeed, much of India’s telecom growth story has been supported by Chinese companies in both hardware and software.

    India’s concerns

    India’s intelligence agencies, acting on inputs generated locally and received from other foreign agencies, have toughened their stance on two key issues – remote access and data storage.

    • A decision has been taken at the top level against data going outside India during the trials and Chinese vendors gaining remote access, which agencies feel will eventually land up in PLA headquarters.
    • Key to the security and strategic concerns is the extremely controversial China Intelligence Law legislated in 2017.
    • The CIL makes it mandatory for every Chinese supplier to actively share data and access to their equipment, installed anywhere in the world.
    • The purpose of this law is to provide a legal base for China to seek access and support from its citizens and companies for its intelligence and military activities.

    Impacted by standoffs

    • After the standoff in Ladakh, India has asked telecom service providers to exclude Chinese companies from the scope of their network upgrade contracts.
    • This was part of the wider decision to signal curbs on Chinese investments and tech companies in the country in light of Atmanirbhar campaign.
    • In official statements, India justified the ban on 59 mobile apps with Chinese links on grounds of a threat to national security.

    With the border clashes, India’s stand on this issue has got more clarity. But 5G is equally crucial for India’s future development story. For that, it has to first overcome own domestic hurdles.  

    Challenges for 5G roll-out in India

    • The Indian market has the potential to become the largest 5G consumer after China in the next 10 years.
    • India has nearly 45 crore handsets and 50 crore people on the internet. 5G is being seen as a game-changer for India.

    These are some of the basic challenges which India needs to overcome:

    Frequency allocation: Indian operators have far less spectrum in comparison to international operators. The high investment cost which makes telecom companies unsure about Return on Investment.

    Pricing: The 5G spectrum is overpriced by at least 30% to 40% compared to international standards and auction in other markets such as South Korea and the U.S. In previous auctions, the government saw no takers for the 700 MHz spectrum, which is used to offer high-speed 4G services and was put on sale for the first time, mainly due to the high reserve price.

    Network investment: In India, the telecom sector is facing capital augmentation issues which need to be resolved. Non-availability of funds for investment: Many of the Indian operators are also weighed down by debt.

    Regulatory restrictions: Faster rounds of new technology introduction when prior technology investments have not been recouped add further complexity.

    Technical Challenges: Designing IT architecture that can be deployed globally, while still allowing for localized technology to cater to different regions is a challenge. Though Reliance Inc. has some plans to roll out 5G.

    Way Forward

    India is keen to board the 5G bus sooner than later. The task before India’s policymakers will be ensuring that the advantages of the telecom infrastructure and related technologies support its divergent demography, economic conditions and urbanisation.

    Key areas to focus need urgent emphasis are :

    • Reasonable spectrum pricing and swift allocation of spectrum
    • Policy framework enabling extensive fabrication and incentivisation to share fibre networks
    • Push for “Make in India” manufacturing for 5G equipment and handsets
    • Tailor-made 5G use cases and applications enabled through active trials
    • Indigenous technology advancements through R&D, and IPR development for standards, technology, spectrum, and security
    • Public-private partnerships for broadband growth and penetration, 5G trials and testing, network densification among others

    To conclude, India cannot miss the bus

    As other countries move ahead, the Indian government has repeatedly stated its intention to ‘not miss the 5G bus’ and ensure rollout by 2020, after having missed the ‘2G, 3G and 4G buses’.

    A closer look, however, is required with regard to the preparedness of the industry, especially given the financial health of the telecom sector, the hesitancy among domestic banks to lend to operators, and the current pressure on tariffs.

    By acting early on adoption, India can accelerate the 5G dividend and also become an innovator in applications, but it would also mean that the initial investment on equipment will be more expensive when trying to be ahead of the curve.

     


    References

    https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/china-huawei-zte-us-apple-6517185/

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/mains/what-is-5g-technology-how-will-it-revolutionise-communication-sector/

    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/telecom/telecom-news/stiff-contest-awaits-jio-as-it-takes-its-5g-tech-to-the-world/articleshow/77206868.cms

    https://www.indiatoday.in/business/story/huawei-5g-ban-in-india-likely-govt-sources-1703692-2020-07-23

    https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/5g-is-about-making-networks-more-effective-its-the-way-forward-in-india-ericsson/article31615684.ece

    https://www.businesstoday.in/opinion/columns/why-5g-is-seen-as-a-game-changer-for-india/story/394896.html

  • [Burning Issue] Police Brutalities and the Need for their Sensitization

    “The police uniform evokes various emotions. There is a fear of oppression and cruelty, as well as a perception of security. This perception shapes into expression from our daily observance. These days, people face a predicament whether to approach the police or not. They are scared whenever they see a policeman approaching them. Instead of feeling secure in their presence, the popular feeling is that of insecurity.”

    Fake encounters, custodial deaths, lathi charge, abductions and third-degree torture — everyday episodes of sensational brutality by the policemen has shaken the nation’s trust in its police system. The horrific downturn in UP; alleged thrashing of a Dalit couple in MP and the murder of Jayaraj and Bennix at the hands of the local Tamil Nadu police has provoked a wide-spread national outrage.

    Police Misconduct: A norm in India?

    Police brutalities can be broadly observed as:

    1) Torture and extrajudicial killings

    • Police use torture and another mistreatment to elicit confessions to the charges they fabricate.
    • While the practice is not the norm in most of India, fake encounter killings occur frequently.
    • Between April 2017 and February 2018, India recorded a staggering 1,674 custodial deaths, a rate of five custodial deaths per day, according to statistics placed by the Home Ministry.
    • UP topped the list, with 374 deaths reported in this period of under a year.

    2) Prejudice and selective persecution

    • The Status of Policing in India Report 2019 reveals disturbing trends on police prejudice.
    • It indicates a significant bias against Minorities. Similar prejudices existed across certain states against Tribals, Dalits, transgenders and migrants from other states.

    3) Professional misconduct

    • Police misconduct refers to inappropriate conduct and illegal actions taken by police officers in connection with their official duties.
    • Types of misconduct include coerced false confession, intimidation, false arrest, falsification of evidence, spoliation of evidence, witness tampering, racial profiling, unwarranted surveillance, searches, and seizure of property.

    4) Corruption

    • A report by Transparency International, show that in India, Police organization is seen as most corrupt by the people.
    • At present, corruption is pervasive among the senior and junior ranks in the form of bribery.
    • Police allegedly buy and sell appointments to positions in the areas most lucrative for extorting money from local businesses and embezzling police funds.

    “Violence now runs in the veins of Gandhi’s nation. It demands police to lynch those who eat beef and do duty only for festive Bandobast and elections.”

    Various Recourse Available to Citizens

    Keeping the above circumstances in mind, it is imperative to understand the framework for pursuing grievances against police excesses.

    • Judicial remedy: Remedies, including compensation, can be sought before the High Courts and the Supreme Court under the violations of fundamental rights.
    • HR sanctions: Relief can also be sought before the National and the State Human Rights Commissions set up under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, but their recommendations are not binding on the respective governments.
    • Criminal cases: Criminal complaints can be filed against the concerned officers for offences under the IPC, 1860, but there is no mechanism for an independent investigation.
    • Disciplining: Since the police is a state subject under the Constitution, disciplinary proceedings and punishment for errant police officers such as suspension, removal or deduction of salary are provided under respective state enactments.

    Why the Indian Police underperform: A Dangerous State of Disrepair

    The police force has always faced its own set of problems that remain hidden and impede its smooth functioning and performance.

    1) Inefficient Deployment and Workload

    • Policemen in India, on an average, work for a minimum of 12 hours a day, with no weekly off, no leaves, no overtime pay and no social life.
    • The police-population ratio, currently 192 policemen per lakh population, is less than what is recommended by UN i.e. 222 policemen per lakh population.

    2) Infrastructure

    • The deteriorating state of the police is most visible at police stations.
    • Decaying, colonial-era police stations and posts across India are stocked with antiquated equipment and lack sufficient police vehicles, phones, computers, and even stationery.
    • Many lacked basic equipment needed for investigating crimes, preserving evidence, and keeping minimally adequate records.

    3) Organizational discrepancies

    • The police structure in India is based on the archaic colonial laws that did not provide the lower ranks, with operational authority or advanced professional training.

    4) Lack of proper training

    • Police training has not seen any modifications since decades. It is severely underfunded. Training is of poor quality because instructors are poor.
    • For lower ranks, pre-induction training of six to nine months are military in style and are dominated merely by physical fitness: “foot drills,” “platoon drill,” and ceremonial parades. That’s it.

    5) Political interference

    • In a culture of sifarish —politically motivated refusal to register complaints, arbitrary detention, and torture and killings sometimes perpetrated by police at the behest of national and state politicians—have resulted in an unprecedented level of public distrust and fear of the police.
    • State and local politicians routinely tell police officers to drop investigations against people with political connections, including known criminals, and to harass or file false charges against political opponents.

    6) Psycho-social alienation

    • Since the onset of the lockdown, Policemen are the most exposed beings to their severity. These days, their work conditions are physically and mentally taxing, and lower-ranking personnel are grossly frustrated over that.
    • The biggest problem they face is that there is a lack of social and family life. The apathy and brutalities these days are somewhat manifestations of these saturating conditions.

    “We have no time to think, no time to sleep. I tell my men that a victim will only come to the police station because we can give him justice, so we should not beat him with a stick. But often the men are tired and irritable and grave mistakes take place out of overt frustrations.”

    The long waited Reforms

    Parliamentary Research Services (PRS) in 2017 put out a report on police reforms in India.

    • They articulated six areas where considerable work was still needed—police accountability; the need to separate law and order from the investigation; poor working conditions and an overburdened police force; constabulary related issues; police infrastructure; and public-police relations.

    Till now, six committees, including the National Police Commission, have been set up by the government. These committees made recommendations in favour of major police reforms. These include the Gore Committee on Police Training (1971-73), the Ribeiro Committee on Police Reforms (1998), the Padmanabhaiah Committee on Police Reforms (2000), the Group of Ministers on National Security (2000-01), and the Malimath Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System (2001-03).

    In what is popularly referred to as the Prakash Singh Case of 2006, the Supreme Court ordered that reform must take place. It made seven-point directives to the Center and State governments.

    The seven directives are:

    1) Limit political control
    Constitute a State Security Commission to:

    • Ensure that the state government does not exercise unwarranted influence or pressure on the police.
    • Lay down broad policy guidelines.
    • Evaluate the performance of the state police.

    2) Appoint based on merit
    Ensure that the Director-General of Police is appointed through a meritbased, transparent process, and secures a minimum tenure of 2 years.

    3) Fix minimum tenure
    Ensure that other police officers on operational duties (Including Superintendents of Police in charge of a district and Station House Officers in charge of a police station) are also provided with a minimum tenure of 2 years.

    4) Separate police functions
    Separate the functions of investigation and maintaining law and order.

    5) Set up fair and transparent systems
    Set up a Police Establishment Board to decide and make recommendations on transfers, postings, promotions and other service-related matters of police officers of and below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police.

    6) Establish a Police Complaints Authority in each state
    At the state level, there should be a Police Complaints Authority to look into public complaints against police officers of and above the rank of Superintendent of Police in cases of serious misconduct, including custodial death, grievous hurt or rape in police custody. At the district level, the Police Complaints Authority should be set up to inquire into public complaints against the police personnel of and up to the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police in cases of serious misconduct.

    7) Set up a selection commission
    A National Security Commission needs to be set up at the union level to prepare a panel for selection and placement of chiefs of the Central Police Organizations with a minimum tenure of 2 years.

    “It has become obvious that the police cannot be neutral. Either you comply with every order from the political masters, or you have some strong backing of a leader who protects you. That is how policing is being done in our country .”

    Reforms: Largely on Papers

    • The directions of the Supreme Court, as usual, have fallen on deaf ears.
    • The Justice Thomas Committee appointed by the Supreme Court for monitoring compliance with the Prakash Singh judgement expressed dismay in its 2010 report over the total indifference exhibited by the states.
    • In 2013, the Justice Verma Committee constituted after the Nirbhaya gangrape also noted such non-compliance in its report and urged all states to fully comply with the top court’s directives to tackle systemic problems in policing.

    Why these reforms are yet unimplemented?

    • What has perhaps stalled the implementation of these reforms is the lack of political will, which in turn could be linked to the growing criminalization of politics.
    • When lawmakers increasingly feature serious criminal charges in their resume, they have very little incentive to professionalize the police force.
    • Growing criminality of politics may be hindering both police performance and the impetus for police reform.

    “Whatever the hiccups are, the clear bottom line is that the police are entrusted with the undeniable duty of protection. They need to inspire confidence amongst the citizen toward them, as nobody else can do better on their behalf.”

    Way Forward

    Efforts to end abuses will not succeed unless made part of a comprehensive overhaul. The following recommendations to both improve the functioning of the police and curtail abuses are drawn from multiple committees:

    1) Overhaul police structures and improve working conditions

    • Improve working conditions: Minimum standards for housing and work hours should be developed, for instance, a requirement that station house officers announce and adhere to a monthly work schedule with maximum hours of work and provide for the mandatory leave.
    • Improve training and equipment: A scarcity of trained personnel can contribute to the likelihood of abusive behaviour, such as the “short-cuts” of refusing to register crime complaints to reduce caseloads and building cases on coerced confessions rather than a collection of evidence. The investigation curriculum at police academies must be bolstered.
    • Training on human rights and professional conduct: Frustrated officers with nothing to lose are more likely to engage in abusive behaviour. To change this environment, HR training must be provided for better police behaviour.

    2) Enforce the law

    • Investigating police abuse and misconduct: The complaints against police officers and their investigation should be done by independent bodies which have no political as well as police interference only the crime against innocent citizens would reduce.
    • Preventing Torture: Strong domestic laws are critical to signalling police that torture is never a permissible means to extract confessions or other information from criminal suspects.
    • Repeal laws that encourage impunity: Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code continues to effectively shield many abusive police officials from prosecution for actions taken on “official duty”.  That needs to be amended.

    3) Ensure accountability and discipline

    • Establish an independent internal affairs or “professional responsibility” unit at the state level to promptly and impartially investigated.
    • Internal investigations should be triggered by allegations made to external government agencies such as the NHRC or other relevant agencies.

    4) Legislative intervention

    To implement the police reforms in letter and spirit, the Indian Parliament must-

    • Amend or replace the Police Act of 1861 with legislation conforming to the requirements of the Supreme Court in Prakash Singh judgement.
    • Amend the CrPC about FIR registration. To ensure prompt police aid to crime victims, amend Section 154 to explicitly state that a police station must register an FIR regardless of jurisdiction. Adopt the 2005 Police Act Drafting Committee’s recommendation to make failure to register an FIR a criminal offence.
    • Ratify the Convention against Torture (UNCAT) and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.
    • Specifically, define Torture and enforced disappearances as criminal offences in the IPC.
    • Amend the Evidence Act to make inadmissible any evidence obtained based on a police interrogation that involved the use of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or other illegal coercion.
    • Amend Section 36 of the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Act, 2006 to permit the NHRC/SHRC to inquire into violations pending before other commissions.
    • Empower the NHRC/SHRC (the so-called toothless tigers) to issue binding orders, rather than non-binding recommendations to the state governments and police.

    The ‘police’ and ‘public order’ being in the State List of Seventh Schedule, police reforms are large to be undertaken by state governments.

    Conclusion

    With movements like Black lives matter, one can easily conclude that police brutality is a global phenomenon. The mentality of being brute with citizens needs to go.

    Training in modern concepts of justice and human rights is the need of the hour. The sensitization programmes for the field officers need to be conducted regularly. Zero tolerance for HR violations must be the mission.

    There has to be promptness of action and decency of behaviour. It is time to transforms it from ‘Ruler’s Police’ to ‘People’s Police.’

     

     


    References

    https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/india-news-opinion-india-must-adopt-zero-tolerance-policy-for-torture-and-death-in-police-custody/303405

    https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/why-india-needs-urgent-police-reforms-46003/

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/police-reform-and-the-crucial-judicial-actor/article31965573.ece

    https://scroll.in/article/966999/thoothukudi-isnt-an-exception-brutal-police-violence-has-always-been-the-norm-in-india

    https://www.tatatrusts.org/upload/pdf/spir-2018-common-cause.pdf

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/08/04/broken-system/dysfunction-abuse-and-impunity-indian-police#

  • [Burning Issue] The ‘Boycott China’ Movement

    [Burning Issue] The ‘Boycott China’ Movement

     

    In one way reminiscent of Mahatma Gandhi’s non-violent resistance to the British Raj, where Indians under occupa­tion forewent Manchester-sewn textiles in favour of “homespun” cloth, the difference between then and now, of course, is that China is not an occupying force here and no more do we rely on the “hoemespun cloth”.

    In this article, we have attempted to provide you the most objective analysis of the issue.

    After the Galwan Valley skirmish, the popular idea resonating in Indian streets is that Indians should boycott Chinese goods and thus “teach China a lesson”. India is considering a range of economic measures aimed at Chinese firms amid the border tensions. The Make in India movement is “gaining ground in the air” amid rising anti-Chinese sentiment but with raised eyebrows.

    The move to ban 59 Chinese apps may be just the start. Many projects have started terminating their contracts with the Chinese.

    Trade with China: A reality check

    China accounts for a sizable portion of India’s top imports, especially where intermediate products or components and raw materials are concerned.

    The Hindi-Chini buy buy

     

    • A third of machinery and almost two-fifths of organic chemicals that India purchases from the world come from China.
    • Automotive parts and fertilizers are other items where China’s share in India’s import is more than 25 per cent.
    • Several of these products are used by Indian manufacturers in the production of finished goods, thus thoroughly integrating China in India’s manufacturing supply chain.
    • For instance India sources close to 90 per cent of certain mobile phone parts from China.

    India’s export to China

    • Even as an export market, China is a major partner for India. At $15.5 billion, it is the third-largest destination for Indian shipments.
    • At the same time, India only accounts for a little over two percent of China’s total exports, according to the Federation of Indian Export Organisation (FIEO).

    The Boycott Movement: Swadeshi 2.0

    Blame it on the pandemic and the border dispute, but the result is the same: some Indian businesses are boycotting China.

    The government is now asking Indian e-commerce companies like Flipkart and Amazon India to label country of origin for all products sold on its websites.

    The “boycott China” movement may not be an official boycott, but it is designed to limit the number of goods China sells to India in hopes India can pick up the slack.

    The digital strike

    • The govt banned 59 Chinese mobile applications, including top social media platforms such as TikTok, Helo and WeChat.
    • India accounts for 0.03% of TikTok’s parent company ByteDance’s global revenue.
    • Thus, banning these apps will make little to no economic impact on China in the short term.
    • On the other hand, this ban might have stymied China’s top tech firms in what many consider to be the world’s largest, untapped digital market.
    • Furthermore, this ban may provide a model for other countries that have expressed concerns about the pervasiveness of apps like TikTok and the privacy threat it poses concerning their citizens’ data.

    Reasons why the #Boycott_China is an ill-advised move:

    1) Trade deficits are not necessarily bad

    • Trade deficits/surpluses are just accounting exercises and having a trade deficit against a country doesn’t make the domestic economy weaker or worse off.
    • Example: If one looks at the top 25 countries with whom India trades, it has a trade surplus with the US, the UK and the Netherlands. But this does not make Indian economy better than them.

    What does this deficit indicate?

    • Both Indian consumers and Chinese producers are gainers through trading.
    • One gets the market other cheap prices. Thus, both are better off than what they would have been without trade.

    So, having a trade deficit is good?

    • Of course NOT. Running persistent trade deficits across all countries raises two main issues.
    • One, availability of foreign exchange reserves to “buy” the imports.
    • Today, India has more than $500 billion of forex — good enough to cover imports for 12 months.
    • Two, lack of domestic capacity to produce most efficiently.

    2) Will hurt the Indian poor the most

    • This is because the poor are more price-sensitive.
    • For instance, if Chinese TVs were replaced by either costlier Indian TVs or less efficient ones, unlike poor, richer Indians may buy the costlier option.
    • Similarly, the Chinese products that are in India are already paid for. By banning their sale or avoiding them, Indians will be hurting fellow Indian retailers.
    • Again, this would hit poorest retailers more due to inability to cope with the unexpected losses.

    3) Will punish Indian producers and exporters

    • Several businesses in India import intermediate goods and raw materials, which, in turn, are used to create final goods — both for the domestic Indian market as well as the global market (as Indian exports).
    • An overwhelming proportion of Chinese imports are in the form of intermediate goods such as electrical machinery, nuclear reactors, fertilizers, optical and photographic measuring equipment organic chemicals etc.
    • Such imports are used to produce final goods which are then either sold in India or exported.
    • A blanket ban on Chinese imports will hurt all these businesses at a time when they are already struggling to survive, apart from hitting India’s ability to produce finished goods.

    Most crucial: The Pharma sector could be worst hit

    • For instance, of the nearly $3.6 billion worth of ingredients that Indian drug-makers import to manufacture several essential medicines, China catered to around 68 per cent.
    • India is considered one of the largest pharma industries in the world and accounts for a considerable portion of imports of finished formulations by other large economies like the US.
    • While pharma consignments from China have unofficially been stopped at ports in India, and are expected to be cleared after thorough checks,
    • A ban could create shortages of medicines both for India’s domestic and export markets.

    4) Will barely hurt China

    • According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) data for 2018, 15.3% of India’s imports are from China, and 5.1% of India’s exports go to China.
    • More importantly, China’s imports from India are less than 1% of its total imports.
    • The point is that if India and China stop trading then — on the face of it — China would lose only 3% of its exports and less than 1% of its imports.
    • However, India will lose 5% of its exports and 14% of its imports. On the whole, it is much easier for China to replace India than for India to replace China.

    5) Chinese money funds Indian unicorns

    • India and China have also become increasingly integrated in recent years.
    • Chinese money, for instance, has penetrated India’s technology sector, with companies like Alibaba and Tencent strategically pumping in billions of dollars into Indian startups such as Zomato, Paytm, Big Basket and Ola.
    • This has led to Chinese giants deeply “embedding themselves” in India’s socio-economic and technology ecosystem.

    6) India will lose policy credibility

    • It has also been suggested that India should renege on existing contracts with China.
    • This can be detrimental to India’s effort to attract foreign investment.
    • As one of the first things, an investor — especially foreign — tracks is the policy credibility and certainty.
    • If policies can be changed overnight or if the government itself reneges on contracts, the investor will either not investor demand higher returns for the increased risk.

    Raising tariffs is mutually assured destruction

    • Many argue that India should just slap higher import duties on Chinese goods or apply prohibitive tariffs on final goods.
    • By doing this, firstly India would be violating rules of the World Trade Organization.
    • Secondly, it would make China and many others reciprocate in the same way.

    Equating border dispute with trade is no panacea

    • The first thing to understand is that turning a border dispute into a trade war is unlikely to solve the border dispute.
    • Worse, given India and China’s position in both global trades as well as relative to each other, this trade war will hurt India far more than China.
    • Again, these measures will be most poorly timed since the Indian economy is already at its weakest point ever — facing a sharp GDP contraction.

    Are there any alternatives in this situation?

    • The decision to boycott non-essential products made in China can be left to the individuals.
    • However, trade-related measures like raising duties on cheaper raw materials imported from China would be better than an outright embargo.
    • This would still allow access to crucial ingredients in the short-term while India looks to build self-reliance or maybe switch to alternate trade partners.
    • It would be better to maybe raise duties on cheaper raw materials instead of going in for a blanket ban.

    What are the alternatives?

    • Countries like the US, Vietnam, Japan, Mexico and certain European countries could be tapped as alternate import sources for some critical electronic, vehicular and pharmaceutical components as well.
    • It is likely that the costs of the raw materials from these alternate sources will be higher and may get passed on to consumers if the manufacturers cannot absorb them.
    • India will need to look into the totality of its trade with China and Hong Kong and implement certain short- to long-term plans to reduce its dependence on them, according to FIEO.

    Way forward

    • In the long term, under the banner of self-reliance, India must develop its domestic capabilities and acquire a higher share of global trade by raising its competitiveness.
    • But no country is completely self-sufficient and that is why trade is such a fantastic idea.
    • It allows countries to specialize in what they can do most efficiently and export that good while importing whatever some other country does more efficiently.
    • The government’s “Atmanirbhar” focus is expected to help ministries handhold industries where self-reliance needs to be built.
    • For the long run, a more effective strategy needs to be built to provide an ecosystem that addresses the cost disability of Indian manufacturing leading to such imports.

    Hence, improving domestic capacities and becoming globally competitive is the way forward.

    Conclusion

    A blanket ban on Chinese imports will hurt all these businesses at a time when they are already struggling to survive, apart from hitting India’s ability to produce finished goods.

    Once the dust settles, they would refrain from escalating a trade war that has the potential to hurt both. Demand for raw material and Chinese goods will go up as the Indian economy revives and it is not in either country’s interest to rock the boat.

    However, the limited period ban reflects sentiment and the determination for self-reliance. It would be an overstatement to call it a popularist movement.

     

    We would love to see you attempting these questions. Post your answer snaps in the comment box.

    Practice question:

    Q. India’s quest for self-reliance is still a distant dream. Critically comment in light of the popular sentiment against the Chinese imports in India.

    Q.“Curbing Chinese imports to India will do more harm than any good”. Analyse.

     

     


    References:

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/will-banning-chinese-imports-hurt-indias-exports/

    https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/opinion/can-india-afford-to-ban-chinese-products-a-trade-war-is-undesirable-in-times-of-covid-19-pandemic

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2020/07/10/india-goes-all-in-on-boycott-china/#24f045db6e19

    https://scroll.in/article/965167/sino-satyagraha-can-india-boycott-china-as-a-response-to-the-ladakh-attack

  • [Burning Issue] India- Sri Lanka Fishermen Issues

    2 days back, an article in Hindu caught our eyes. It was – “Indian trawlers are back, say Sri Lanka’s fishermen”. This is not a new issue, in fact, this news piece has it’s own way of making it back to the headlines again and again.

    The conflict has also strained both countries’ bilateral ties, with talks at the highest levels and among fisher leaders on both sides proving futile for years.

    So, today let us look at this news from a holistic point of view, through this edition of Burning Issue.

    • Indian boats have been fishing in the troubled waters for centuries and had a free run of the Bay of Bengal, the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar until 1974 and 1976 when treaties were signed between the two countries to demarcate the maritime boundary — the ‘International Maritime Boundary Line'(IMBL).
    • However, the treaties failed to factor in the hardship of thousands of traditional Indian fishermen who were forced to restrict themselves to a meager area in their fishing forays.
    • The small islet of Katchatheevu, hitherto used by them for sorting their catch and drying their nets, fell on the Lankan side of the IMBL.
    • Fishermen often risk their lives and cross the IMBL rather than return empty-handed, but the Sri Lankan Navy is on alert, and have either arrested or destroyed fishing nets and vessels of those who have crossed the line.

    The Palk Bay

    Historically, the shallow waters of the Palk Bay and geographical contiguity between India and Sri Lanka facilitated the movement of ideas, goods, and men.

    • The Palk Bay, a narrow strip of water separating the state of Tamil Nadu in India from the Northern Province of Sri Lanka.
    • The bay, which is 137 km in length and varies from 64 to 137 kilometers in width, is divided by the International Maritime Boundary Line (IMBL).
    • Bordering it are five Indian districts and three Sri Lankan districts.

    Its significance

    • The bonds of ethnicity, language, and religion helped fishermen lead the lives of harmonious coexistence for several centuries.
    • Frequent migrations between India and Sri Lanka through the Palk Bay took place. Intermarriages were common.
    • However, over the last several decades, internal and bilateral relations have suffered from a range of issues from coastal insecurity to overfishing.

    End of the civil war

    • The region has become a highly contested site in recent decades, with the conflict taking on a new dimension since the end of the Sri Lankan Civil War in 2009.
    • Now the livelihood of Sri Lankan Tamil fishermen was at stake, thus, the Sri Lankan navy expanded and become more vigilant.
    • In India, the fisheries dispute chiefly began with an internal debate about sovereignty related to the ceding of the island of Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka.
    • The problem got exacerbated by the tension between fishermen practicing traditional fishing and those using trawlers.

    What are the issues here?

    The various dimensions of the fishermen issue between India and Sri Lanka can be encapsulated as follows:

    1) Issue over Sovereignty

    • The maritime boundary agreements of 1974 and 1976 delimited international boundaries in the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar and Bay of Bengal, respectively.
    • They were concluded by the two governments in the name of good neighbourly relations, but they did not reflect realities on the ground because the people concerned, namely fishermen, were not consulted.
    • The principle of national sovereignty underpinned both agreements.
    • A close personal relationship between both prime ministers, Indira Gandhi and Sirimavo Bandaranaike, facilitated the successful conclusion.
    • However, from the perspective of Tamil Nadu, the ceding of the island of Katchatheevu in the Palk Bay to Sri Lanka was a grave mistake.

    2) Poaching and Trawling

    • Fueling the dispute over Katchatheevu is the overuse of mechanized trawlers in the Palk Bay, the damaging environmental and economic effects of trawling.
    • To increase productivity and boost exports, the government of India embarked on a radical transformation of fishing techniques. The result was the introduction of trawlers.
    • Quick returns from prawns attracted many from non-fishing communities to invest in this profitable venture. As a result, numerous fishermen became wage labourers.
    • Trawlers have since been referred to as the “hoovers of the shelf bottom” and “bulldozers mowing down fish and other benthic species.
    • After their introduction, the Indian side of the Palk Bay quickly became devoid of fish.

    3) Tougher laws

    • After some respite in the last couple of years, Sri Lanka introduced tougher laws banning bottom-trawling and put heavy fines for trespassing foreign vessels.
    • Crossing the IMBL poses a greater threat as Sri Lanka has amended its Foreign Fisheries Boats Regulation Act to increase the fine on Indian vessels found fishing in Sri Lankan waters to a minimum of LKR 6 million (about ₹25 lakh) and a maximum of LKR 175 million (about ₹17.5 Crore).

    4) Fisherman’s concerns

    • There is a depletion of fisheries on the Indian side, so Indian fishermen cross into Sri Lankan waters thus denying the livelihood of their counterparts.
    • They deliberately cross the territorial waters even at the risk of getting arrested or shot dead by the Sri Lankan Navy.
    • Sri Lankan fishermen across Palk Bay are concerned over similar depletion on their side (where there is a ban for trawlers) because of poaching by their brethren from Tamil Nadu.
    • Apart from enforcing the trawler ban, the Sri Lankan Navy has also stepped up the monitoring of coasts, especially those that are proximate to India. The idea is to prevent any movement of remnant militants back into the island.

    Implications on the fishermen

    • The ongoing dispute has escalated tensions between those fishermen using traditional methods and those using mechanized methods, as well as increased the infringement of territorial boundaries.
    • According to the government of Tamil Nadu, the sufferings of Indian Tamil fishermen is a direct consequence of ceding Katchatheevu to Sri Lanka and sacrificing the traditional fishing rights enjoyed by Indian fishermen.
    • In a defiant speech on August 15, 1991, Jayalalitha called on the people of Tamil Nadu to retrieve the island.

    Averting a Crisis

    • The underlying issues of the fisheries dispute need to be addressed, so that relations between fishermen and their governments, between Tamil Nadu and New Delhi, and between Tamil Nadu and Colombo do not reach a crisis point.
    • Immediate actions should be taken to begin the phase-out of trawling and identify other fishing practices.
    • Katchatheevu Issue: The unilateral abrogation of the maritime boundary agreement on India’s part would cause irreparable damage to India’s image. Need to stay away from politics here.

    Alternative solutions

    • Leasing: Two courses of action exist: (1) get back the island of Katchatheevu on “lease in perpetuity” or (2) permit licensed Indian fishermen to fish within a designated area of Sri Lankan waters and vice versa.
    • Licensing: The second course of action would persuade Colombo to permit licensed Indian fishermen to fish in Sri Lankan waters for five nautical miles from the IMBL.
    • There is precedent in the 1976 boundary agreement, which allowed licensed Sri Lankan fishermen to fish in the Wadge Bank (a fertile fishing ground located near Kanyakumari) for a period of three years.
    • Reconsidering old agreements: A window of opportunity opened at the end of India–Sri Lanka foreign secretary consultations in July 2003, when the Sri Lankan government agreed for the first time to consider proposals for licensed fishing. This can be revisited.

    Looping in fishermen themselves

    • Though the idea of meetings among fishermen was conceptualized way back in 2003, it was not pursued seriously.
    • Arranging frequent meetings between fishing communities of both countries could be systematized so as to develop a friendlier atmosphere mid-seas during fishing.
    • Starting ferry services between India and Sri Lanka can improve people to people linkages. Mutual recognition of each other’s concerns and interests can improve the relationship between both countries.
    • Media personnel can be invited to witness those practical issues confronted by the fishermen in each country. This would make a qualitative difference in reporting.

    Way Forward

    • Action should be taken immediately to end the use of mechanized trawlers within one year, and the government should implement a buy-back arrangement as soon as possible.
    • Through incentives and persuasion, fishermen from the Palk Bay could be encouraged to switch over to deep-sea fishing in the Indian exclusive economic zone and in international waters.
    • Social security reforms for the fishermen community is necessary to empower them.
    • Diversification of livelihood options of fishermen.
    • Improving the fishing industry by itself like there is huge untapped potential for processed foods which will not only boost infrastructure in this sector but also reduce wastages.

    Conclusion

    The success of diplomacy lies in converting a crisis into an opportunity. If New Delhi and Tamil Nadu are determined, they can create a win-win scenario in the Palk Bay.

    Overall, if the fishermen issue is not approached holistically, the marine frontiers between India and Sri Lanka will remain fishy and troubled. Ultimately, India must view the Palk Bay region as a common heritage of the two countries and project this vision.

     

     

     


    References

    https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/indian-trawlers-are-back-say-sri-lankas-fishermen/article32024955.ece

    https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/why-are-several-tn-fishermen-in-trouble-with-the-sri-lankan-navy/article22716002.ece

    https://carnegieindia.org/2016/09/09/india-sri-lanka-fisheries-dispute-creating-win-win-in-palk-bay-pub-64538

    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/peace-at-bay-why-the-india-lanka-fishing-issue-continues-to-fester/articleshow/72349257.cms

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0974928417749643

  • [Burning Issue] Education in Times of COVID-19

     

    Many countries are suggesting various levels of containment in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19. With these worries, schools and universities are closing down and moving abruptly to online platforms and remote education. This sudden change has us asking, “Is the education system in India on a verge of collapse?”

    Context

    Sometime in the second week of March, governments across the country began shutting down schools and colleges temporarily as a measure to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus. It’s been almost four months. The debate over future of education has led to various concerns among students, parents, educational institutions as well as policymakers.

    Social distance and Education

    Schools, Colleges and various Institutes across the globe are simply instructed to limit the exposure of susceptible student population. This includes measure such as-

    • School closures
    • Postponing/rescheduling examinations
    • Cleaning and sanitization of premises
    • Consideration of long-term contingency

    How Education has been impacted so far?

    1) Delays

    • Standardized testing and school admissions are being delayed across the country.
    • Some states have opted to cancel or delay standardized testing, while others are thinking of extending the school year due to delays and many missed days of school.

    2) Challenges for staff and students

    • Adaption issues: As school and university staff learn how to convert their lessons to online platforms, both students and staff are learning how to deal with remote learning and communication.
    • Overnight change: Though technology has already had a big hand in most school affairs, the new dependence on technology for every aspect of education is forced to occur overnight.

    3) Learning impairments

    • Lack of concentration: Younger children, as well as specially-abled students, find it difficult to concentrate on full capacity with online educational tools.
    • Young children need the assistance of in-person instruction and may find it difficult to concentrate on a typical frontal class conducted on a computer.
    • Specially-abled ones: Students with special needs, who also rely on in-person instruction, may find it especially difficult to switch to online platforms.
    • These difficulties may require a more unique approach to online learning or may demand the extra assistance of parents as these students navigate a new educational paradigm.

    4) Fear of dropouts and child labour

    • Disadvantaged, at-risk, or homeless children are more unlikely to return to school after the closures are ended, and the effect will often be a life-long disadvantage from lost opportunities.
    • A livelihood loss for low earning families has drawn severe triggers for dropouts and child labour as well.

    5) Productivity and employment

    • The pandemic has significantly disrupted the higher education sector as well, which is a critical determinant of a country’s economic future.
    • A large number of Indian students—second only to China—enroll in universities abroad, especially in countries worst affected by the pandemic, the US, UK, Australia and China.
    • Many such students have now been barred from leaving these countries. If the situation persists, in the long run, a decline in the demand for international higher education is expected.
    • Recent graduates in India fear the withdrawal of job offers from corporates because of the current situation.

    6) Strain on the health-care system

    • Women make up almost 70% of the health care workforce, exposing them to a greater risk of infection.
    • They often cannot attend work because of childcare obligations that result from school closures.
    • This means that many medical professionals are not at the facilities where they are most needed during a health crisis.

    Consequences: A setback beyond closures

    • Children have fewer opportunities of learning from home. Further, closure of schools is likely to lead to parents missing work, in order to stay at home and take care of the children.
    • This also affects productivity, incurs a loss in wages, consequently affecting the community and the economy as a whole.
    • Midday meals: Schools in India also have a social element attached to them. With closed schools, the health and nutrition of students will be affected, especially schedule caste and scheduled tribes.

    Response to the Crisis

    The Indian government has taken cognizance of the untapped potential of e-learning.

    E-VIDYA: The one-nation-one platform facility through the PM E-Vidya platform and a dedicated channel for students from Class 1 to Class 12 will liberalize distance and online learning regulatory framework. Moreover, emphasis on community radio, podcasts, and customized content for differently-abled will enable more inclusivity into access to education.

    Rise of MOOCS: The UGC has encouraged them to adopt massive open online courses (MOOCs) offered on its SWAYAM platform for credit transfers in the coming semesters.

    Encouraging VidyaDaan: The Union HRD Ministry has e-launched VidyaDaan 2.0 program for inviting e-learning content contributions. ‘Vidya Daan’ is a digital program to enable contributions to improve teaching & learning.

    Distant Learning has its limitations

    In India, 320 million students have been affected by COVID-19 school closures. Needless to say, the pandemic has transformed the centuries-old, chalk–talk teaching model to one driven by technology. Online learning has become a critical lifeline for education, which has its inherent limitations.

    1) Digital illiteracy and Lack of technology access

    • “Online teaching” ignores India’s immense digital divide—with embedded gender and class divides.

    • Digital illiteracy and lack of access to technology or fast, reliable internet access prevent students in rural areas and from disadvantaged families.
    • It is an obstacle to continued learning, especially for students from disadvantaged families.

    2) Unequal access to educational resources

    • Lack of limitations and exceptions costly paid courses can also have an impact on the ability of students to access the textbooks and materials they need to study.
    • Several initiatives are now being taken by the government to grant that students and teachers can have access to open educational resources or understand copyright limitations.

    3) Nutrition and food insecurity

    • Nutrition plays a critical role in cognitive development and academic performance for children.
    • Many children rely on free or discounted meals at schools or the food under the Midday Meal Scheme.
    • When schools close, nutrition is especially compromised for children.

    4) Passive learning

    • India is a country where the backbone for online learning is not yet ready and the curriculum was never designed for such a format.
    • The sudden shift to online learning without any planning has created the risk of most of our students becoming passive learners and they seem to be losing interest due to low levels of attention span.
    • We are now beginning to realize that online learning could be dull as it is creating a new set of passive learners which can pose new challenges.

    Lessons learned during the Lockdown

    While lamentable, the disruption to education systems worldwide offers valuable lessons and provides a unique opportunity to reimagine education, the curriculum, and pedagogy.

    The current system gives a disproportionate emphasis on information transfer and not the knowledge.

    1) The digital divide needs to be bridged

    • Technology has the potential to achieve universal quality education and improve learning outcomes.
    • But in order to unleash its potential, the digital divide (and its embedded gender divide) must be addressed.
    • Digital capabilities, the required infrastructure, and connectivity must reach the remotest and poorest communities.
    • Access to technology and the internet is an urgent requirement in the information age. It should no longer be a luxury.

    2) The curriculum needs a revamp

    • While teachers are struggling to learn digital ways of communicating with their students, it is clear that we need to pay close attention to what we teach.
    • This crisis is teaching us that curricula must be grounded in students’ realities, cultivating critical, creative, and flexible thinking, resilience, and empathy in students.
    • Developing a symbiotic relationship with our environment has taken on a new urgency, and teachers must help students think about their relationship with the universe and everyone and everything in it.
    • Now is the time for governments to integrate such a curriculum into the national curricular framework.

    3) A wider cadre of teachers need to be created

    • This crisis is forcing teachers to reinvent their roles from that of transferring information to enabling learning.
    • The shift to distance learning has afforded many opportunities to teach differently, encouraging self-learning, providing opportunities to learn from diverse resources, and allowing customized learning for diverse needs through high-tech and low-tech sources.

    4) Empowering the community with resources

    • Continuing education amid school closures has also taught us an important lesson about the role of the community in teaching our children.
    • Improving the education system requires a decentralized, democratic community-based approach, where community ownership of education is cultivated.
    • Important for this is the hiring of local teachers (with adequate Dalit and female representation), which increases teachers’ accountability to children’s families and their ability to empathize with students’ lives.

    UNESCO recommendations

    The UNESCO has made these recommendations for engaging in online learning:

    • Develop distance learning rules and monitor students’ learning process: Define the rules with parents and students on distance learning. Design formative questions, tests, or exercises to monitor closely students’ learning process.
    • Examine the readiness and choose the most relevant tools: Decide on the use of high-technology and low-technology solutions based on the reliability and availability of resources. This could range through integrated digital learning platforms, video lessons, MOOCs, to broadcasting through radios and TVs.
    • Ensure inclusion of the distance learning programmes: Implement measures to ensure that students including those with disabilities or from low-income backgrounds have access to distance learning programmes if only a limited number of them have access to digital devices.
    • Prioritize solutions to address psychosocial challenges before teaching: Create communities to ensure regular human interactions, enable social caring measures, and address possible psychosocial challenges that students may face when they are isolated.
    • Plan the study schedule of the distance learning programmes: Plan the schedule depending on the situation of the affected zones, level of studies, needs of students’ needs, and availability of parents.
    • Provide support to teachers and parents on the use of digital tools: Organise brief training or orientation sessions for teachers and parents as well, if monitoring and facilitation are needed.
    • Blend appropriate approaches and limit the number of applications and platforms: Blend tools or media that are available for most students, both for synchronous communication and lessons and for asynchronous learning.
    • Define the duration of distance learning units based on students’ self-regulation skills: Keep a coherent timing according to the level of the students’ self-regulation and abilities especially for live-streaming classes. Preferably, the unit for primary school students should not be more than 20 minutes, and no longer than 40 minutes for secondary school students.
    • Create communities and enhance connection: Create communities of teachers, parents, and school managers to address a sense of loneliness or helplessness, facilitate sharing of experience and discussion on coping strategies when facing learning difficulties.

    Way Forward

    A multi-pronged strategy is necessary to manage the crisis and build a resilient Indian education system in the long term.

    Immediate measures like Open-source digital learning solutions and Learning Management Software should be adopted so teachers can conduct teaching online.

    The DIKSHA platform, with reach across all states in India, can be further strengthened to ensure accessibility of learning to the students.

    It is important to reconsider the current delivery and pedagogical methods in school and higher education by seamlessly integrating classroom learning with e-learning modes to build a unified learning system.

    There is an information explosion in India. It is important to establish quality assurance mechanisms and quality benchmark for online learning developed and offered by India HEIs as well as e-learning platforms that are experiencing a boom.

    Conclusion

    Online classes are no substitutes for classroom lectures for a variety of reasons. The digital divide is one off the reason. Surely, it should be built as a complementary tool.

     

     

     


    References

    https://government.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/education/covid-19-pandemic-impact-and-strategies-for-education-sector-in-india/75173099

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2020/05/14/covid-19-in-india-education-disrupted-and-lessons-learned/

    http://confluence.ias.ac.in/the-impact-of-the-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-on-the-education-sector-in-india/

    https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/featurephilia/story/covid-19-4-negative-impacts-and-4-opportunities-created-for-education-1677206-2020-05-12

    http://bweducation.businessworld.in/article/Decoding-COVID-19-Impact-On-Indian-Education-/05-06-2020-194419/

    https://www.uopeople.edu/blog/impact-of-coronavirus-on-education/

    https://www.indiaeducation.net/resources/articles/impact-of-coronavirus-on-education.html

  • [Burning Issue] US Visa Ban and its Impact on India

    We have been having a bad summer! The Nepalese have face-palmed us, the Chinese have taken our territory and let not forget the Covid crisis. Now Donald Trump has dealt a blow to thousands aspiring for a career in the US.

    The US administration extended the 60-day ban on immigration and non-immigrant worker visas till the end of 2020. Popular work visas including the much-coveted H-1B and H-2B, and certain categories of H-4, J, and L visas would also remain suspended until December 31.

    Apart from the suspension of these work visas, the executive order signed by Trump has also made sweeping changes to the H-1B work visa norms, which will no longer be decided by the currently prevalent lottery system. The new norms will now favour highly-skilled workers who are paid the highest wages by their respective companies.

    What are H-1B, H-2B, L and other work visas?

    • In order to fill a vacuum of highly-skilled low-cost employees in IT and other related domains, the US administration issues a certain number of visas each year which allows companies from outside the US to send employees to work on client sites.
    • Of these work visas, the H-1B remains the most popular among Indian IT companies.
    • The US government has a cap of 85,000 total H-1B visas for each year.

    Here are the visas that have been put on hold till December 2020:

    1) H-1B visa

    What is it: The H-1B visa category covers individuals who “work in a speciality occupation, engage in cooperative research and development projects administered by the US Department of Defense or are fashion models that have national or international acclaim and recognition.”

    Who’s covered: The H-1B is most well known as a visa for skilled tech workers, but other industries, like health care and the media, also use these visas.

    2) H-2B visa

    What it is: According to USCIS, the H-2B program allows US employers or agents “to bring foreign nationals to the United States to fill temporary non-agricultural jobs.”

    Who’s covered: They generally apply to seasonal workers in industries like landscaping, forestry, hospitality and construction.

    3) J-1 visa

    What it is: The J-1 visa is an exchange visitor visa for individuals approved to participate in work-and-study-based exchange visitor programs in the United States.

    Who’s covered:
    The impacted people include interns, trainees, teachers, camp counsellors, au pairs and participants in summer work travel programs.

    4) L-1 visa

    What it is: The L1 Visa is reserved for managerial or executive professionals transferring to the US from within the same company, or a subsidiary of it. The L1 Visa can also be used for a foreign company opening up US operations.

    Who’s covered: Within the L1 Visa, there are two subsidiary types of visas

    • L1A visa for managers and executives.
    • L1B visa for those with specialized knowledge.

    The story of work visas

    • The 1952 scheme: Since it was started in 1952, the H-1 visa scheme has undergone many changes and revisions to allow or disallow certain categories of skilled workers in the US, depending on the economic situation of the country.
    • Harnessing the technology boom: The technology boom coupled with the arrival of the internet and low-cost computers in developing nations such as India and China saw a large number of graduates willing to work at relatively low costs in the US.
    • This is often the win-win situation for both the employer in the US and the employee.
    • Bypassing Americans: However, it has since often been criticised for sending low-cost workers to the US at the expense of domestic workers.

    Trumps in ‘The Protectionism’

    • Donald Trump coming to power: In January 2017, after taking over as the president of the US, Trump had hinted that the low-cost workers were hampering the economy and undercutting jobs of citizens.
    • Delivering election vendetta: The US had then hinted at reforming the “broken” H-1B visa system.
    • COVID uncertainties: Trump seized the opportunity provided by the economic contraction due to Covid-19 by first banning the entry of non-immigrant workers till June 23, and then extending it till December 31.
    • Sudden unemployment: The White House reasoned that the ongoing pandemic has “significantly disrupted Americans’ livelihoods”, to the extent that the overall unemployment rate quadrupled between February and May 2020 to a little over 13%.

    Motive behind the visa ban

    • Breaking the chain: The ban implies that U.S. firms or others with U.S. operations who rely on skilled foreign nationals working in the U.S. will be unable to make new hires as long as the ban stands.
    • Looming slowdown: Many firms are unlikely to do any hiring at this economically depressed time.
    • Upcoming elections’ agenda: As per popular opinion, this is a method by the US President to reach out to the voter base.
    • Yet again- ‘America first’: Trump would take all moves to build political capital in the name of the “America First” mantra — a foregone conclusion given his outspokenness on the subject to date.

    Who all does it impact?

    • The visa ban means those who do not have a valid non-immigrant visa as of June 23 and are outside of the US, will not be allowed to enter the country until December 31.
    • Workers in essential services in the food sector have been given some reprieve, and their entry shall be decided by the consular officer of immigration services.
    • H-1B, H-2B, J and L visa holders, and their spouse or children already present in the US shall not be impacted by the new worker visa ban.
    • H-1B visas are generally approved for a period of three years for a person, but many visa holders change employers to extend their US stay.
    • Foreign nationals outside the US, who were to begin work on an H-1B visa or even L-1 visas (intra-company transfer) – but do not as yet hold a valid visa, as well as dependents who were to accompany them (be it spouses or dependent children) will have to wait longer, till the ban expires.

    Will Indian corporations be hit?

    This visa ban come at a crucial inflexion point for the Indian economy when restrictions on the movement of people and goods slowly will be lifted after India passes its peak viral case numbers. This would create a knock-on effect from IT to other sectors.

    1) IT sector

    • Indian IT companies are amongst the biggest beneficiaries of the US H-1B visa regime and have since the 1990s cornered a lion’s share of the total number of visas issued each year.
    • As of April 1, 2020, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) had received about 2.5 lakh H-1B work visa applications, according to official data.
    • Indians had applied for as many as 1.84 lakh or 67 per cent of the total H-1B work visas for the current financial year ending March 2021.
    • India’s IT services exports to the U.S., which depend significantly on the H-1B visa, have been an important constituent element of bilateral economic trade.
    • Though the large Indian IT companies have cut down their dependency on H-1B and other worker visas by hiring as much as 50 per cent of staff locally, they still rely on these visas to keep costs in check.

    2) Highly skilled workers

    • Favouring highest-paid worker could result in a significant impact on margins and worker wages of Indian IT companies which send thousands of low-cost employees to work on client sites in the US.
    • This, in turn, impacts their remuneration in the long term.

    Silver lining

    • Newer opportunities for Indian high skilled workers in the IT sector in other countries outside of the US will be explored after this ban.
    • H1B1 has drawn away from the best talent from India for decades. This move may cause reverse brain gain for better growth of the Indian tech industry.
    • These would in turn benefit innovation, R&D for nurturing the growing start-up sector in India.
    • Most of the companies have become capable of handling their work remotely in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. This has provided resilience to the Indian tech sector against international mobility restrictions.
    • With this ban, already employed skilled workers from India may get higher salaries which in turn would increase the inflow of remittances.

    Criticism within the US

    • Google CEO Sunder Pichai has expressed disappointment over the proclamation, and said he would stand with immigrants and work to expand opportunity for all.
    • He said that immigration has contributed immensely to America’s economic success, making it a global leader in tech, and also Google the company it is today.
    • The ban on issuing visas will harm employers, families, universities, hospitals, communities, and delay America’s economic recovery.

    Impact on bilateral ties

    • An internal matter for the US: The freezing of non-immigration work visas is more of a US election-related issue rather than an indication of any mutual problems between India and the US.
    • India & the US share global strategic partnership, based on shared democratic values and similarity of interests on bilateral, regional and global issues.
    • However despite this strong bond and despite hectic talks at diplomatic levels between India and the US, the Trump administration decided in favour of implementing the ban.
    • The issue becomes a sensitive one as US cooperation becomes strategically necessary for India amid its border tensions and skirmishes with China.

    Way Forward

    • For its benefits, the US should amend the H-1B programme, not end it.
    • Immigrants have played a crucial role in making the USA a global leader in cutting edge technology.
    • Suspending the visas will only weaken the USA’s economy and its health care workforce at a time when there is a need to strengthen both.
    • Politics should not trump smart policy and the ingenuity of migrant workers should be harnessed to revive an economy in dire straits.

    Conclusion

    • India needs to keep the US on its side for strategic and security reasons.
    • But the immediate future of the relationship depends on the upcoming US presidential elections.
    • If India-US relationship is a defining one for this century, as PM Modi has said, the visa ban decision should not let this sour in.
    • Lastly, we can conclude that the US has maligned its image of being the global ambassador of Liberalism.

     

     

     


    References

    https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/us-h1b-visa-suspension-india-it-companies-6471966/

    https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-hindu-explains-how-will-the-us-visa-ban-impact-india/article31935322.ece

    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/nri/visa-and-immigration/trumps-h1-b-order-makes-it-impossible-for-many-indians-to-return-to-their-lives-in-the-us/articleshow/76663260.cms?from=mdr

    https://www.theweek.in/news/biz-tech/2020/06/23/how-will-trump-H1B-visa-ban-affect-indians.html

  • [Burning Issue] Rajya Sabha and Its Functioning

    The Rajya Sabha elections were recently concluded. Leaving aside the tussle for majority in Rajya sabha(to get bills passed), this body has been in news for many reasons. One of the primary debate also questions the very need of an upper house. So, in today’s article we will talk about THE House of elders. The voting procedure, functions and analysis on it’s present need – yes! everything is written below.

    The Rajya Sabha

    • The Rajya Sabha or Council of States is the upper house of the bicameral Parliament.
    • It currently has a maximum membership of 245, of which 233 are elected by the legislatures of the states and union territories using single transferable votes through Open Ballot.
    • The President can appoint 12 members for their contributions to art, literature, science, and social services.
    • Members sit for terms lasting six years, with elections every year but almost a third of the 233 designates up for election every two years, specifically in even-numbered years.

    A Historical background

    • The Rajya Sabha came into being on April 3, 1952, and held its first session on May 13 the same year.
    • The Constituent Assembly, which was formed in 1947, after the adoption of the Constitution became the Provisional Parliament and made laws till 1952.

    Before its existence

    • The central legislature that came into being under the Government of India Act, 1919 was bicameral.
    • Under 1919 Act, Council of States had 60 members and Legislative Assembly had 145 members.
    • The membership and voting norms for the Council of States were restrictive. These restrictions meant only wealthy landowners, merchants and those with legislative experience could enter it.
    • Women could neither vote nor seek membership.
    • The Government of India Act, 1935 proposed an elaborate and improved version of the second chamber, but this never materialized.

    Elections to the Rajya Sabha

    Qualifications

    Article 84 of the Constitution lays down the qualifications for membership of Parliament. A member of the Rajya Sabha must:

    • Be a citizen of India; Be at least 30 years old. (Article 84 constitution of India)
    • Be elected by the Legislative Assembly of States and UTs by means of the single transferable vote through proportional representation.
    • Not be: a proclaimed criminal, a subject of an insolvent, of unsound mind.
    • Not hold any other office of profit under the Government of India.
    • Possess such other qualifications as may be prescribed in that behalf by or under any law made by Parliament.

    In addition, twelve members are nominated by the President of India having special knowledge in various areas like arts and science. However, they are not entitled to vote in Presidential elections as per Article 55 of the Constitution.

    Election procedure

    • Candidates fielded by political parties have to be proposed by at least 10 members of the Assembly or 10% of the party’s strength in the House, whichever is less.
    • For independents, there should be 10 proposers, all of whom should be members of the Assembly.

    Voting procedure

    • Voting is by single transferable vote, as the election is held on the principle of proportional representation.
    • A single transferable vote means electors can vote for any number of candidates in order of their preference.
    • A candidate requires a specified number of first preference votes to win. Each first choice vote has a value of 100 in the first round.
    • To qualify, a candidate needs one point more than the quotient obtained by dividing the total value of the number of seats for which elections are taking place plus one.
    • The formula simply is [(Number of MLAs X 100) / (Vacancies + 1)] + 1.

    Example: If there are four seats and 180 MLAs voting, the qualifying number will be 180/5= 36 votes or value of 3,600.

    Note: The Rajya Sabha polls have a system of the open ballot, but it is a limited form of openness. There is a system of each party MLA showing his or her marked ballots to the party’s authorised agent (called Whip), before they are put into the ballot box.

    The NOTA option has been struck down by the Supreme Court in RS elections.

    The Power Equation: Lok Sabha Vs Rajya Sabha

    The Indian Constitution provides for parity of powers between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha in law, making an exception in some cases.

    The Money Bill or Finance Bills can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha which only can approve the Demands for Grants.

    On the other hand, the Rajya Sabha has some special powers as requiring adopting a resolution allowing Parliament to legislate on subjects in the State List and creating All India Services, besides approving proclamations of Emergency and President’s Rule when the Lok Sabha is dissolved.

    Renowned British philosopher and political economist John Stuart Mill as early as in 1861 said in his great treatise Considerations on Representative Government that management of free institutions requires conciliation; a readiness to compromise; a willingness to concede something to opponents and mutual give and take. Truly, Rajya sabha plays this role in Indian legislature.

    In detail: Powers and Functions of the Rajya Sabha

    1. Legislative Powers:

    • In the sphere of ordinary law-making, the Rajya Sabha enjoys equal powers with the Lok Sabha. An ordinary bill can be introduced in the Rajya Sabha and it cannot become a law unless passed by it.
    • In case of a deadlock between the two Houses of Parliament over an ordinary bill and if it remains unresolved for six months, the President can convene a joint sitting of the two Houses for resolving the deadlock.
    • This joint sitting is presided over by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. But if the deadlock is not resolved, the bill is deemed to have been killed.

    2. Financial Powers:

    • In the financial sphere, the Rajya Sabha is a weak House.
    • A money bill cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha. It can be initiated only in the Lok Sabha.
    • A money bill passed by the Lok Sabha comes before the Rajya Sabha for its consideration.

    3. Executive Powers:

    • Members of the Rajya Sabha can exercise some control over the ministers by criticizing their policies, by asking questions and moving motions etc.
    • Some of the ministers are also taken from the Rajya Sabha. The PM can also be from Rajya Sabha if the majority party in the Lok Sabha may elect/adopt him as its leader.

    4. Electoral Powers:

    • The Rajya Sabha has some electoral powers also. The elected members of the Rajya Sabha along with the elected members of the Lok Sabha and all the State Legislative Assemblies together elect the President of India.
    • The members of the Rajya Sabha Lok Sabha together elect the Vice- President of India.
    • Members of the Rajya Sabha also elect a Deputy Chairman from amongst themselves.

    5. Judicial Powers:

    • The RS acting along with the Lok Sabha can impeach the President on charges of violation of the Constitution.
    • The RS can also pass a special address for causing the removal of a judge of the Supreme Court or of any High Court.
    • The charges against the Vice-President can be levelled only in the RS.
    • The RS can pass a resolution for the removal of some high officers like the Attorney General of India, Comptroller and Auditor General and Chief Election Commissioner.

    6. Miscellaneous Powers:

    The Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha jointly perform the following functions:

    • Approval of the ordinances issued by the President,
    • Ratification of an emergency proclamation,
    • Making any change in the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, and
    • Making any change in the qualifications for the membership of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.

    7. Exclusive Powers

    The Rajya Sabha enjoys two exclusive powers:

    (i) The Power to declare a subject of State List as a subject of National Importance:

    The Rajya Sabha can pass a resolution by 2/3rd majority of its members for declaring a State List subject as a subject of national importance. Such a resolution empowers the Union Parliament to legislate on such a state subject for a period of one year. Such resolutions can be repeatedly passed by the Rajya Sabha.

    (ii) Power in respect of Creation or Abolition of an All India Service:

    The Rajya Sabha has the power to create one or more new All India Services. It can do so by passing a resolution supported by 2/3rd majority on the plea of national interest. In a similar way, the Rajya Sabha can disband an existing All India Service.

    Limitations to its powers

    The Constitution places some restrictions on Rajya Sabha; the Lok Sabha is more powerful in certain areas as such:

    1. Money bills

    • A money bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha by a minister and only on recommendation of President of India.
    • When the Lok Sabha passes a money bill then the Lok Sabha sends money bill to the Rajya Sabha for 14 days during which it can make recommendations.
    • Even if Rajya Sabha fails to return the money bill in 14 days to the Lok Sabha, that bill is deemed to have passed by both the Houses.

    Also, if the Lok Sabha rejects any (or all) of the amendments proposed by the Rajya Sabha, the bill is deemed to have been passed. Hence, Rajya Sabha can only give recommendations for a money bill but Rajya Sabha cannot amend a money bill.

    There is no joint sitting of both the houses with respect to money bills, because all final decisions are taken by the Lok Sabha.

    2. Joint Sitting of the Parliament

    • Article 108 provides for a joint sitting of the two Houses of Parliament in certain cases.
    • Considering that the numerical strength of Lok Sabha is more than twice that of Rajya Sabha, Lok Sabha tends to have a greater influence in a joint sitting of Parliament.  A joint session is chaired by the Speaker of Lok Sabha.

    Joint sessions of Parliament are a rarity, and have been convened only three times in last 71 years, for the purpose of passage of a specific legislative act, the latest time being in 2002:

    • 1961: Dowry Prohibition Act, 1958
    • 1978: Banking Services Commission (Repeal) Act, 1977
    • 2002: Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002

     3. No confidence motion:

      • The Union Council of Ministers is collectively responsible before the Lok Sabha and not the Rajya Sabha.
      • Lok Sabha alone can cause the fall of the Council of Ministers by passing a vote of no-confidence.

    Rajya Sabha: A destructionist?

    • An analysis by the Secretariat revealed that the productivity of the Rajya Sabha till 1997 has been 100% and above and the past 23 years have thrown up a disturbing trend of rising disruptions.
    • This decline is primarily on account of disruptions forcing cancellation of Question Hour frequently. Disruptions also dent the quality of law-making as seen in passing of Bills without discussion sometimes.
    • However, the Rajya Sabha is proving to be more and more a ‘deliberative’ body with increasingly more time being spent on this function.
    • According to various members of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha has done nothing except stalling legislative works and causing policy paralysis in the country.
    • For critics, the Upper House serves no purpose as its members are not directly elected and hence are not accountable to the people.
    • Rajya Sabha often has members from the party defeated in various elections, or are from political families, and due to political differences, they do not allow passage of important bills.
    • So many extra members are an added burden on exchequer which can be done away with.
    • Politics of boycotting and creating ruckus in the house and toeing on the party-line even on the issue that won’t attract disqualification provisions is a worrying thing.
    • At the same time, in terms of working, Rajya Sabha does not have sufficient powers in financial matters to bring any change and they are without any direct public interaction. Hence its purpose in modern democracy seems outdated.

    Importance of Rajya Sabha and Why It Should Continue

    • According to President Radhakrishnan, there are functions, which a revising chamber like Rajya Sabha can fulfil fruitfully. Parliament is not only a legislative but a deliberative body. So far as its deliberative functions are concerned, Rajya Sabha has made very valuable contributions time and again.
    • It’s true that party dynamics affects the working of Rajya Sabha. But in democracy passion often defeat the normal rationality. Thus a revising house is needed to check such adrenal rush.
    • While the argument of members not able to win in direct elections holds true, but retaining talent is essential for any democratic system. Losing valuable talent during election fervours has mostly been corrected by Rajya Sabha. It has also given entry to other experts like scientist, artist, sportsmen etc that can rarely face the electoral politics.
    • While Lok Sabha have members for each state, the Hindi belt domination is a constant theme. Hence other state interests, like those in North East, have always been taken up by the Rajya Sabha.
    • While it can’t bring no confidence motion or amend money bill, its role in checking arbitrariness of government, as reflected in Land Ordinance, is necessary in democracy. Besides its special role in All India Services, legislation in State List too necessitates its existence.
    • Men and women of prodigious talent and calibre have adorned the benches of the upper house and have contributed significantly towards realising the vision of the founding fathers of the Constitution.
    • A permanent Upper House is also a check against any abrupt changes in the composition of the Lower House.
    • Rajya Sabha has continuity and is a permanent house.
    • Unlike Lok Sabha, it cannot be dissolved by anyone. Thus it has, time and often, carried out some administrative functions even when the lower house is dissolved. It has members with experienced players while there may be new entrants in the Lok Sabha.

    By virtue of this, Rajya Sabha can’t be said to be ‘obstructive’.

    Conclusion

    A study of the powers of the Rajya Sabha leads us to the conclusion that it is neither a very weak house like the British House of Lords nor a very powerful house as the American Senate. Its position is somewhat mid-way between the two. It has been less powerful than Lok Sabha but it has been not a very weak or insignificant House.

    Instead of engaging in the debate of if we need upper house or not, more constructive outlook would be improve it’s functioning. Clearly, the recommendations are present from NCRWC to 2nd ARC. The need is implementation and political support.

     

    Try this question from our AWE Initiative:

    How far do you agree with the view that Rajya Sabha has done nothing exceptional in last 70 years except stalling work and therefore it should be abolished? (10 Marks)


    References

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajya_Sabha

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/explained-how-are-elections-to-the-rajya-sabha-held/

    https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/comment-do-numbers-matter-in-rajya-sabha/article31569127.ece

    https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/political-science/rajya-sabha-functions-and-powers-of-the-rajya-sabha/40342

  • [Burning Issue] India’s Ailing Health Sector and Coronavirus

    Healthcare is LITERALLY the talk of the town right now. But for all the wrong reasons. Whether it is the lack of beds/ventilators or high cost of treatment, COVID has amplified our present deficiencies.  Like rest of the world, Indians are for the first time so singularly focused on healthcare and public health amid this pandemic. And everyone suddenly wants to fix healthcare!

    Confucius, it is said, once observed, “a seed grows with no sound, but a tree falls with huge noise. Destruction has noise, but creation is quiet”. As we all know, the world is at a crossroads. With COVID-19, many of our beliefs and the systems we follow are bound to change OR even get collapsed!

    Healthcare in India: A Background

    • The Indian Constitution has incorporated the responsibility of the state in ensuring basic nutrition, basic standard of living, public health, protection of workers, special provisions for disabled persons, and other health standards, which were described under Articles 39, 41, 42, and 47 in the DPSP.
    • Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for the right to life and personal liberty and is a fundamental right.
    • Public Health comes under the state list.
    • India’s expenditure on healthcare has shot up substantially in the past few years; it is still very low in comparison to the peer nations (at approx. 1.28% of GDP).

    All-time Paradoxes of Indian Healthcare

    (1) Healthcare is a fundamental right, but it is not fundamentally right in India:

    The Supreme Court has held healthcare to be a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution.

    The expenditure on healthcare is one of the lowest in the world, lower than nations with similar economic growth rates. Though our economy has grown robustly post-liberalization, investment in healthcare has consistently hovered around 1% of the GDP. In the 2020-21 Budget, it was 1.02% of overall expenditure.

    (2) Sector attracts investments, but delivery remains contentious:

    India’s healthcare sector has attracted a steady stream of investments, albeit at the higher end of the value chain — the secondary & tertiary care. Lack of penetration, inflated billing, opaqueness in diagnosis, and poor quality of service has ensured that most Indians get treated below the standards prescribed by the WHO.

    (3) Among the cheapest in the world, yet unaffordable for most locally:

    Healthcare in India is cheap. For example: Compared to India, the cost of a knee replacement treatment is over twenty times more in the US and double in Malaysia. Yet India has one of the world’s highest rates of out-of-pocket spending in healthcare. There are millions in India who cannot afford these procedures in their own country.

    (4) Less than one doctor for 1,000 patients, but medical tourism booms:

    India treated 3.6 lakh foreign patients in 2016 and the country’s medical tourism market is expected to grow to $7-8 billion by 2020. The doctor-patient ratio in India is less than the WHO-prescribed limit of 1:1000. There is a dearth of medical schools and clinicians.

    Most hospitals in India are overburdened, understaffed, and ill-equipped. However, all this has not prevented the private healthcare sector to establish sophisticated medical tourism facilities on the plank of ‘world-class service at low cost’.

    (5) Stark divergence in healthcare outcomes within the country:

    Healthcare being a state subject, the healthcare outcomes have remained divergent based on the quality of the state administration. While North India is the most populated part of India, it has one of the most undeserved healthcare infrastructures in the country.

    Is India prepared to face this pandemic?

    • Current health infrastructure in India paints a dismal picture of the healthcare delivery system in the country.
    • Public health experts believe that India is ill-equipped to handle such emergencies. It is not prepared to tackle health epidemics, particularly given its urban congestion.
    • Post unlock, the spread is at a galloping rate.
    • The slum clusters all around the cities and the unhygienic growth, poor waste disposal system will only aggravate the situation.

    History shows us that “blame” has been a standard human response during pandemics.

    These are some issues surfaced during this pandemic ………..

    (1) Poor Infrastructure

    • In the 2019 Global Health Security Index, which measures pandemic preparedness for countries based on their ability to handle the crisis, India ranked 57, lower than the US at 1, the UK at 2, Brazil at 22, and Italy at 31.
    • This is well revealed through indicators like hospital beds per 1,000 people.
    • As per the OECD data available for 2017, India reportedly has only 0.53 beds available per 1,000 people as against 0.87 in Bangladesh, 2.11 in Chile, 1.38 in Mexico, 4.34 in China, and 8.05 in Russia.

    (2) Fewer doctors per thousand

    • The WHO mandates that the doctor to population ratio should be 1:1,000, while India had a 1:1,404 ratio as of February 2020.
    • In rural areas, this doctor-patient ratio is as low as 1:10,926 doctors as per National Health Profile 2019.

    (3) Denial of healthcare

    • Despite private hospitals accounting for 62 percent of the total hospital beds as well as ICU beds and almost 56 percent of the ventilators, they are handling only around 10 percent of the workload.
    • Private hospitals are reportedly denying treatments to the poor. Cases of overcharging patients are also being reported in private hospitals.
    • This is seen in Bihar, which has witnessed an almost complete withdrawal of the private health sector and has nearly twice the bed capacity of public facilities.

    (4) Discrepancy in Testing

    • India continues to test less than it should in a post-lockdown scenario where testing is one of the most obvious ways to flatten the curve.
    • The Supreme Court, after ruling on April 8 that private labs should conduct free testing, modified its decision five days later to fix the rate of one of the most dependable tests at Rs 4,500.

    (5) Negligence for mental healthcare

    • The tragic death of an actor and the gloom of the Covid-19 pandemic have led to much-needed conversations on mental health in the country.
    • Mental health problems were already a major contributor to the burden of illness in India which usually gets unnoticed.
    • The widespread anxiety due to lockdown has frustrated the laborers, farmers, and various vulnerable sections to a great extent due to the fear of impoverishment and loss of livelihoods.

    Need of the hour: A tectonic overhaul

    (1) Universal health coverage

    • Access to healthcare in India is not equitable—the rich and the middle class would survive the COVID-19 or any other crisis but not the poor.
    • As part of the SDGs, all countries have pledged to deliver universal health coverage (UHC) by 2030.
    • This includes India. But, sadly, nearly 50 percent of the world’s population lacks essential health services.
    • If any good comes out of this crisis, then it will be India waking up to the reality that investing in health is not a luxury. It is a basic need.

    (2) Increasing healthcare professionals in numbers

    • India has handled the COVID-19 pandemic exceptionally well. However, considering the rise in the number of infections, India is in dire need of more medical staff and amenities.
    • If India wants to achieve a 1:1,000 ratio, it will need an additional 2.07 million doctors by 2030. For this, the government needs to increase its spending on the health sector.
    • It needs to aid attempts at constructing new medical institutes.

    (3) Revamping medical education

    • If the government wants to stay successful in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, it needs to rapidly build medical institutions and increase the number of doctors.
    • Once COVID-19 is under control, we need to consider the psychological and professional impact of the pandemic on medical professionals.

    (4) Helping the downtrodden

    • How the poor are going to manage without, or even with, any government insurance scheme is a big question.
    • Rather than dumping them on government hospitals only, the private hospitals should be held accountable to take on their treatment.
    • They can make up for the loss by cross-subsidizing treatments of patients with premium insurance policies.

    (5) Enhancing pandemic preparedness

    • With COVID-19 we risk once again falling into the trap of a narrow vertical disease-specific approach.
    • Decades of global health experience have revealed the limitations of narrow “vertical” disease-based programs.
    • However, there is a need for recognition to combine vertical programs with “horizontal” health system strengthening.

    (6) Optimum use of technology

    • The COVID-19 crisis has elevated the importance of digital tools and e-health.
    • There is a growing use of mobile apps, online consultations, e-pharmacies, and other tools.
    • These are all welcome and must be leveraged.

    (7) Looping-in private players

    • For too long, India has allowed the private health sector to grow, with little regulation.
    • The lack of alignment between the public and private sectors has been clearly exposed to COVID-19 testing and treatment in India.
    • Time is ripe to loop in private players and promote the industrialization of health-sector.

    (8) Learning from the successes

    • With crumbling health infrastructure due to overburden, India’s preparedness for handling this epidemic has become a major challenge.
    • The world along with India being no exception has responded with extraordinarily aggressive measures such as phased lockdowns, Bhilwara Model, Pathanamthitta Model, Taiwan model, etc.
    • The success of these models is attributed to various best practices which are were implemented days before the thought of nationwide lockdown was incepted.

    Kindly refer for various success models:

    [Burning Issue] Success stories in handling COVID-19 crisis

     

    Way Forward

    • The aerial spread of the pandemic post unlock poses a threat of rapid dissemination but it can still be contained with an efficient response that combines effective public health, microbiological, clinical, and communication responses.
    • While our laboratory network has improved somewhat, but much needs to be done to improve the community facing primary health services and risk communication to the public.
    • Kerala’s success in responding swiftly and smartly to the outbreak should be a role model for other states.

    Conclusion

    India’s healthcare system is too small for such a large population. There seems to be a long battle ahead. The public healthcare system cannot be improved overnight. The country needs all hands on deck during and after this crisis—both public and private sectors must work together and deliver universal health coverage for all citizens.

    Ultimately, the onus of governance always rests with the government, which needs to set standards, invest resources, ensure quality, and strategically purchase services from the private sector, as needed.

     

     

     


    References

    https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/coronavirus-epidemic-healthcare-system-public-hospitals-6449264/

    https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/india-health-sector-education-coronavirus-medcine-6449332/

    https://www.cnbctv18.com/views/can-the-coronavirus-crisis-guide-india-towards-an-equitable-robust-health-system-6076701.htm

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6166510/

    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/five-paradoxes-of-indian-healthcare/articleshow/65159929.cms?from=mdr

  • [Burning Issues] Eclipses This Year

    [Burning Issues] Eclipses This Year

     

    On June 21, 2020 India witnessed an Annular solar eclipse. Solar Eclipses have caused fear, inspired curiosity, and have been associated with myths, legends, and superstitions throughout history. Take for example myth 101: Don’t eat food. Why? Let’s leave the myths and superstitions behind and discuss the science behind eclipses.

     

    In the clouds of this pandemic, we are witnessing some spectacular celestial dances this year. Beginning with the Super Pink Moon and Lunar Eclipse this year, we recently witnessed the breathtaking ‘Ring of Fire’ Solar Eclipse.

    What are Eclipses?

    An eclipse takes place when one heavenly body such as a moon or planet moves into the shadow of another heavenly body.

    There are two types of eclipses on Earth: an eclipse of the Moon and an eclipse of the Sun.

    [I] A Lunar Eclipse

    • The moon moves in an orbit around Earth, and at the same time, Earth orbits the sun. Sometimes Earth moves between the sun and the moon.
    • When this happens, Earth blocks the sunlight that normally is reflected by the moon. (This sunlight is what causes the moon to shine.)
    • Instead of light hitting the moon’s surface, Earth’s shadow falls on it. This is an eclipse of the moon — a lunar eclipse.
    • A lunar eclipse can occur only when the moon is full. (But not every full moon is also a lunar eclipse. Can you guess why?)

    Observing a Lunar Eclipse

    • A lunar eclipse can be seen from Earth at night.
    • A lunar eclipse usually lasts for a few hours.
    • At least two partial lunar eclipses happen every year, but total lunar eclipses are rare.

    There are two types of lunar eclipses: total lunar eclipses and partial lunar eclipses.

    A total lunar eclipse occurs when the moon and the sun are on exact opposite sides of Earth. Although the moon is in Earth’s shadow, some sunlight reaches the moon.  The sunlight passes through Earth’s atmosphere, which causes Earth’s atmosphere to filter out most of the blue light. This makes the moon appear red to people on Earth.

    A partial lunar eclipse happens when only a part of the moon enters Earth’s shadow. In a partial eclipse, Earth’s shadow appears very dark on the side of the moon facing Earth. What people see from Earth during a partial lunar eclipse depends on how the sun, Earth and moon are lined up.

    In a penumbral lunar eclipse, only the more diffuse outer shadow of Earth – the penumbra – falls on the moon’s face. This third kind of lunar eclipse is much more subtle, and much more difficult to observe than either a total or partial eclipse of the moon.

    [II] A Solar Eclipse

    • Sometimes when the moon orbits Earth, it moves between the sun and Earth.
    • When this happens, the moon blocks the light of the sun from reaching Earth.
    • This causes an eclipse of the sun or solar eclipse.
    • During a solar eclipse, the moon casts a shadow onto Earth.

    There are three types of solar eclipses.

    The first is a Total Solar Eclipse

    A total solar eclipse is only visible from a small area on Earth. The people who see the total eclipse are in the centre of the moon’s shadow when it hits Earth. The sky becomes very dark as if it were night. For a total eclipse to take place, the sun, moon and Earth must be in a direct line.

    The second type is a Partial Solar Eclipse

    This happens when the sun, moon and Earth are not exactly lined up. The sun appears to have a dark shadow on only a small part of its surface.

    The third type is an Annular Solar Eclipse

    An annular eclipse happens when the moon is farthest from Earth. Because the moon is farther away from Earth, it seems smaller. It does not block the entire view of the sun. The moon in front of the sun looks like a dark disk on top of a larger sun-coloured disk. This creates what looks like a ring around the moon.

    During a solar eclipse, the moon casts two shadows on Earth. The first shadow is called the Umbra. This shadow gets smaller as it reaches Earth. It is the dark centre of the moon’s shadow.

    The second shadow is called the Penumbra. The penumbra gets larger as it reaches Earth. People standing in the penumbra will see a partial eclipse. People standing in the umbra will see a total eclipse.

    Observing a Solar Eclipse

    • Solar eclipses happen once every 18 months.
    • Unlike lunar eclipses, solar eclipses only last for a few minutes.

    Why don’t solar eclipses happen at every New Moon?

    To Go With 4

    The reason is that the Moon’s orbit tilts 5° to Earth’s orbit around the Sun. Astronomers call the two intersections of these paths nodes. Eclipses only occur when the Sun lies at one node and the Moon is at its New (for solar eclipses) or Full (for lunar eclipses) phase. During most (lunar) months, the Sun lies either above or below one of the nodes, and no eclipse happens.

    [III] Planet Transits

    When a planet comes between Earth and the Sun, it is called a transit. The only 2 planets that can be seen transiting the Sun from Earth are Venus and Mercury because they are the only planets that orbit inside Earth’s orbit.

    From 2000–2199, there will be 14 transits of Mercury. However, Venus transits are even rarer with only 2 this century, in 2004 and 2012.

     


    Before we end our article on eclipses, we leave you with some previous years’ questions to try:

     

    Q. 1) On 21st June, the Sun: (CSP 2019)

    (a) Does not set below the horizon at the Arctic Circle

    (b) Does not set below the horizon at Antarctic Circle

    (c) Shines vertically overhead at noon on theEquator

    (d) Shines vertically overhead at the Tropic of Capricorn

     

    Q.2) Variations in the length of daytime and night time from season to season are due to: (CSP 2013)

    (a) The earth’s rotation on its axis

    (b) The earth’s revolution around the sun in an elliptical manner

    (c) Latitudinal position of the place

    (d) Revolution of the earth on a tilted axis

     

    Q.3) Consider the following:

    1. Electromagnetic radiation
    2. Geothermal energy
    3. Gravitational force
    4. Plate movements
    5. Rotation of the earth
    6. Revolution of the earth

    Which of the above are responsible for bringing dynamic changes on the surface of the earth? (CSP 2016)

    (a) 1, 2, 3 and 4 only

    (b) 1, 3, 5 and 6 only

    (c) 2, 4, 5 and 6 only

    (d) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

     

    Q.4) A person stood alone in a desert on a dark night and wanted to reach his village which was situated 5km east of the point where he was standing. He had no instruments to find the direction but he located the polestar, the most convenient way now to reach his village is to walk in the- (CSP 2012)

    (a) facing the polestar

    (b) opposite to the polestar

    (c) keeping the polestar to his left

    (d) keeping the polestar to his right


    References

    https://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/eclipse-information.html

    https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-an-eclipse-58/

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/ring-of-fire-solar-eclipse/

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/what-is-lunar-eclipse/

    https://www.celestron.com/blogs/eclipse-watch/frequently-asked-questions-about-solar-eclipses

  • [Burning Issue] Blockchain Technology and COVID-19

     

    The coronavirus has impacted countries, communities and individuals in countless ways, from school closures to health-care insurance issues, not to undermine loss of lives. As governments scramble to address these problems, different solutions based on blockchain technologies have sprung up to help deal with the worldwide crisis.

     

    What is Blockchain Technology?

    Simply, blockchain is decentralized, distributed and public digital ledger.  Blockchains is a new type of network infrastructure (a way to organize how information and value move around on the internet) that create ‘trust’ in networks by introducing distributed verifiability, auditability, and consensus.

    Blockchains create trust by acting as a shared database, distributed across vast peer-to-peer networks that have no single point of failure and no single source of truth, implying that no individual entity can own a blockchain network, and no single entity can modify the data stored on it unilaterally without the consensus of its peers.

    New data can be added to a blockchain only through agreement between the various nodes of the network, a mechanism known as distributed consensus. Each node of the network keeps its own copy of blockchain’s data and keeps the other nodes honest – if one node changes its local copy, the other nodes can reject it.

    imagine a blockchain as a ledger—because that’s essentially how most blockchains function. Each block of data represents some new transaction on the ledger, whether that means a contract or a sale or whatever else you’d use a ledger for.

    Interestingly, blockchains leverage techniques from a field of mathematics and computer science, known as cryptography, to sign every transaction (e.g. the transfer of assets from one person to another) with a unique digital signature belonging to the user who initiated the transaction.

    Blockchains and Cryptocurrency – How it all began?

    A cryptocurrency is a digital or virtual currency that uses cryptography for security.  The Bitcoin protocol is built on the blockchain.

    • Bitcoin is an example of electronic or digital currency that works on a peer-to-peer basis.
    • Bitcoins can be sent digitally to anyone who has a bitcoin address anywhere in the globe. One person could have multiple addresses for different purposes – personal, business and the like.
    • A bitcoin is not printed currency but is a non-repudiable record of every transaction that it has been through. All this is part of a huge ledger called the blockchain.

    There’s also a new cryptocurrency called Libra rolled out by Facebook.

    • Initially, blockchain technology was linked to cryptocurrency only but today it’s application are widespread.

    Various uses of Blockchain in fighting COVID-19

    Blockchain could be used to improve a variety of healthcare-related processes, including record management, healthcare surveillance, tracking disease outbreaks, management crisis situations and many more.

    1) Tracking Infectious Disease Outbreaks

    • Blockchain can be used for tracking public health data surveillance, particularly for infectious disease outbreaks such as COVID-19.
    • With increased blockchain transparency, it will result in more accurate reporting and efficient responses.
    • Blockchain can help develop treatments swiftly as they would allow for rapid processing of data, thus enabling early detection of symptoms before they spread to the level of epidemics.

    2) Donations Tracking

    • As trust is one of the major issues in donations, Blockchain has a solution for this issue.
    • There has been a concern that the millions of dollars being donated for the public are not being put to use where needed.
    • With the help of blockchain capabilities, donors can see where funds are most urgently required and can track their donations until they are provided with verification that their contributions have been received to the victims.

    3) Crisis Management

    • Blockchain could also manage a crisis situation. It could instantly alert the public about the Coronavirus by global institutes like the WHO using smart contracts concept.
    • Not only it can alert, but Blockchain could also enable to provide governments with recommendations about how to contain the virus.
    • It could offer a secure platform where all the concerning authorities such as governments, medical professionals, media, health organizations, media, and others can update each other about the situation and prevent it from worsening further.

    4) Securing Medical Supply Chains

    • Blockchain has already proven its success stories as a supply chain management tool in various industries; similarly, it could also be beneficial in tracking and tracing medical supply chains.
    • Blockchain-based platforms can be useful in reviewing, recording, and tracking of demand, supplies, and logistics of epidemic prevention materials.
    • As supply chains involve multiple parties, the entire process of record and verification is tamper-proof by every party, while also allowing anyone to track the process.

    6) Education

    • ‘Certificates’ are a means of verifying the credentials of individuals across domains and geographies. A paper-based certification is fallible to manipulation and susceptible to fraud.
    • The blockchain-based SuperCert promises anti-fraud identity intelligence blockchain solution for educational certificates.
    • The immutability feature of blockchain ensures that tampering of certificate is not feasible – both the content of the certificate and the identity of the certificate holder.

    7) Finance

    • Blockchain integration in financial transactions will not only save time and money, but it will also make the transaction processing and authentication process much more seamless.
    • Furthermore, Blockchain can be an excellent tool to monitor money laundering and black money accumulation – since all transactions are permanently stored on the Blockchain network, every transaction is accountable.
    • Blockchain is also capable of dealing with issues like double spending and unauthorized spending.
    • With Covid panic on use of cash currency, here one may find alternatives too.

    Various Challenges in adopting Blockchains

    Any transformative technology, in its initial stages of development, as it moves out of the research/development phase to first few applications to large scale deployment, faces several challenges.

    • There is no confidence in the technology: It is still an innovation. Building trust in the network represents a challenge for blockchain.
    • High costs and complexity of blockchain.
    • Lack of understanding comes next as many executives have a vague understanding of blockchain and the changes it will bring. Many still connect it only with cryptocurrencies management.
    • A general lack of standards is also a problem. Blockchain-specific vocabulary is insufficient; its terminology is both scarce and new.
    • A lack of general regulation is a problem. The Supreme Court of India has ruled against a decision imposed by the country’s central bank nearly two years ago that stifled crypto trading in Asia’s third-largest economy.
    • Vague data regulation in countries due to poor laws and policy is one more issue.
    • Lack of blockchain talent: Whenever a groundbreaking technology emerges, the developer community needs time and resources to accommodate the new demand.
    • Energy consumption The majority of blockchains present in the market consume a high amount of energy. It requires high amounts of computation power to solve a complex mathematical problem to verify and process transactions and to secure the network. Add to this the energy needed to cool down the computers, and the costs increase exponentially.

    Blockchain: the India imperative

    India has a unique strategy for the Government to take the lead in creating public digital infrastructure and allowing private sector innovation to leverage Blockchain for further development.

    NITI Aayog has released recommendations to establish India as a vibrant blockchain ecosystem. The suggested recommendations include:

    • Regulatory and policy considerations for evolving a vibrant blockchain ecosystem
    • IndiaChain: Creation of a national infrastructure for the deployment of blockchain solutions with inbuilt fabric, identity platform and incentive platform
    • India as blockchain hub: promotion of research and development in blockchain, in addition, to focus on skilling of workforce and students
    • Procurement process for government agencies to adopt blockchain solutions
    • Cryptocurrencies for India: Pegged stable coin for Indian Rupee for seamless exchange for blockchain solutions. This may be in conjunction with the need for re-evaluating cryptocurrencies.

    Way Forward

    • Although India is still at the nascent stage in exploring Blockchain technology, it holds is immense potential for Blockchain applications.
    • The key lies in overcoming the challenges faced during the early adoption phase – if we can get past the obstacles in the initial stage, Blockchain tech can be put to good use to strengthen the Indian economy.
    • The days of blockchain application have just begun and as with any new technology, blockchain will hit a few roadblocks especially with the government’s regulators across the globe.
    • As the true essence of blockchain application is to take the power away from the hands of the powerful by decentralizing information and handing it over to the people- democracy in true sense.
    • Nonetheless as with any movement, if people see the value the technology brings into their lives they will rally behind it and blockchain application will become mainstream in most industries in the coming years.

    Conclusion

    By providing help in the COVID-19 crisis and recovery, blockchain can play a pivotal role in accelerating post-crisis digital transformation initiatives and solving those problems highlighted in the current system.

    However, at the present moment, blockchain is not the panacea of all the problems. While the promise and potential of blockchain are undoubtedly transformative, it is still in the nascence of its evolution.

    Keeping a tab on this technology and our capacities is the right direction we can head towards.

  • [Burning Issue] India-Nepal Border Row

    Culturally speaking, India and Nepal share a great people to people interaction. But lately the two countries have been in news not for the camaraderie they share but the border tensions. Like China was not enough! In this article, we provide the explanation of the map related row that’s been brewing up. Also, a general outlay of the bilateral relation is discussed to provide a better understanding for your preparation.

    Context

    Construction of an 80-km-long road through the Lipulekh Pass got the 2 Himalayan neighbors into the fighting arena. The road was constructed with the purpose to reduce the travel time for Indian pilgrims visiting the religious shrine at Kailash-Mansarovar in Tibet. Nepal claims it to be violation of it’s borders.

    But first some geography – Lipulekh Pass

    • In Uttarakhand, Lipulekh Pass comes under Chaudans valley of Dharchula, a sub-district of Pithoragarh district in the Kumaon region where it links with the Byash Valley of Nepal and with Tibet, an Autonomous Region of China.
    • The famous pilgrimage to Mount Kailash that is also known as Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, traverses from this pass.
    • The 17,000-feet high Pass is located close to the disputed Kalapani area, which is claimed by both sides.

    So, what is the issue?

    • The inauguration of the “new road to Mansarovar” on May 8 by India’s defence minister has strained the relations between Nepal and India.
    • While India argues that Kalapani is a part of Uttarakhand’s Pithoragarh district, Nepal claims it falls in its Darchula district.
    • The 1816 Sugauli Treaty between Nepal and British India placed all the territories east of the Kali (Mahakali) river, including Limpiyadhura, Kalapani and Lipu Lekh at the northwestern front of Nepal, on its side.
    • Lipu Lekh pass is 4 km northwest and Limpiyadhura 53 km west of Tinker pass.
    • The borders of Nepal, India and China intersect in this area.
    • Given the situation in 1961, Nepal and China fixed pillar number one at Tinker pass with the understanding that pillar number zero (the tri-junction of Nepal, India, and China) would be fixed later.

    The Treaty of Sugauli

    • Treaty of Sagauli, (March 4, 1816), an agreement between the Gurkha chiefs of Nepal and the British Indian government that ended the Anglo-Nepalese (Gurkha) War (1814–16).
    • By the treaty, Nepal renounced all claim to the disputed Tarai, or lowland country, and ceded its conquests west of the Kali River and extending to the Sutlej River.
    • Nepal remained independent, but it received a British resident with the status of an ambassador to an independent country rather than of the controlling agent of the supreme government in an Indian state.

    Why is Lipulekh important for India?

    • For India, the Lipulekh pass has security implications. After its disastrous 1962 border war with China, it was concerned about a possible Chinese intrusion through the pass and has been keen to hold on to the strategic Himalayan route to guard against any future incursions.
    • The link road via Lipulekh Himalayan Pass is also considered one of the shortest and most feasible trade routes between India and China.
    • The Nepalese reaction would probably have triggered in response to Chinese assertion.

    What is Nepal’s saying in all this?

    • Nepal claims Kalapani is a part of its territory, based on the Sagauli Treaty signed by Nepal’s Gurkha chiefs and British India on March 4, 1816, to end their three-year-long Anglo-Nepalese War.
    • It asserts that it ceded control of the areas west of the Kali River, as well as the disputed Tarai, but retained stretches east of the water body, including Limpiyadhura, Kalapani, and Lipulekh as per the agreement.
    • In 2015, Nepal had also expressed its disagreement over India and China agreed to include Lipulekh Pass as a bilateral trade route in a joint statement during PM Modi’s visit to Beijing.

    Indian stance

    • Nepal surrendered a part of its western territory in 1816 after its forces were defeated by the British East India company.
    • The subsequent Sugauli treaty defined the origin of the Kali river as Nepal’s border point with India. But the two countries differ on the source of the Kali river.
    • India argues that the exact coordinates of the river were not mentioned in the treaty and claims that improved survey techniques have redrawn the map in the years since.

    So has China been meddling?

    • The suspicion in Delhi is Kathmandu’s new-found confidence is because of Chinese backing.
    • The Indian army chief, General MM Naravane, has said publicly that Nepal “might have raised this problem at the behest of someone else” – an indirect reference to alleged Chinese interference.
    • And some mainstream right-wing media in India have called Nepal “China’s Proxy” for raising the border issue. The remarks did not go down well in Kathmandu.

    Solving border disputes

    • Assuming that there is political buy-in from the leadership on both sides, the one workable solution is to seek some form of co-management or shared sovereignty for the disputed territory.
    • There are many bold possibilities: maybe there could be a joint deployment of military and police forces, as during the 1960s on the Nepal-China border.
    • Given the trade potential, both countries could also consider establishing a special economic zone.
    • Finally, it is in the interest of both that Indian and Nepali pilgrims can use the improved infrastructure in the Kalapani region to reach Mount Kailash.
    • The next steps should be approval of the strip maps by the respective governments (that of the Nepalese Government is still awaited), the resolution of the differences of opinion over Kalapani and Susta, and speeding up the erection of damaged or missing border pillars.

    Various facets of India-Nepal ties

    1. Cultural ties

    • While enjoying their own peculiarities, both India and Nepal share a common culture and ways of life.
    • Religion is perhaps the most important factor and plays a predominant role in shaping the cultural relations between these two countries, marked by a cross country pilgrimage on Char Dham Yatra, Pashupatinath Temple and some Buddhist sites.
    • A considerable section of Nepalese comprises of Madhesi population which has familial & ethnic ties with states of Bihar, UP.

    2. Strategic ties

    • Nepal is a buffer state between India and China.
    • Several Nepali Citizens are also deployed in Indian defence forces as well.

    3. Political ties

    • Constitutional turmoil is not new in Nepal. India has played a vital role in the democratic transition in Nepal against the monarch King Gyanendra.
    • Nepali Congress (NC) is one of the country’s oldest parties which supports relations with India, but the communist parties show a tilt towards China.

    4. Economic ties

    • Nepal is an important export market for India.
    • Himalayan rivers flowing through Nepal can be used for Hydroelectric power projects which will benefit border states of UP, Bihar and other adjacent areas.
    • There are three major water deals between Nepal and India, namely the Kosi Agreement, the Gandak Treaty and the Mahakali Treaty. India also exports Power to Nepal.
    • Also, Nepal is the largest borrower of Indian Currency in South Asia.

    India’s importance to Nepal

    • India is the nearest foreign employer to Nepali Citizens, which provides various avenues of work and ease in assimilation into a foreign culture.
    • Nepal’s reluctance to Mandarin has overturned several Nepali students into Indian universities.
    • India is the only potential neighbour who could harness Nepal’s hydropower.
    • Moreover, Indian tourists are the major movers of Nepal’s tourism sector.

    Major Irritants in bilateral ties

    1) Nepali nationalism and Anti-India sentiments

    • Anti-India Sentiment in Nepal is largely politically motivated as it is wrongly perceived as India’s backing to Monarchy.
    • The widening gap in understanding each other’s concerns has helped feed Nepali nationalism and create a dense cloud of distrust and suspicion between the two countries.
    • The gap widened after India chose to impose an economic blockade in response to Nepal’s sovereign decision to promulgate a democratic constitution.

    2) China factor

    • Increasing Chinese presence in Nepal is one of the major concern for India. China’s move to extend the rail link to its border with Nepal can reduce its dependence on India.
    • Fundamentally these Chinese agencies are building up anti-India sentiments in Nepal.
    • Nepal’s assent for “One Belt One Region” (OBOR) initiative of China is viewed by India with suspicion.
    • Nepal has been slowly fallen prey to China’s inroad debt trap policy.

    3) India has ignored the changing political narrative for long

    • The reality is that India has ignored the changing political narrative in Nepal for far too long.
    • For too long India has invoked a “special relationship”, based on shared culture, language and religion, to anchor its ties with Nepal.
    • The 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship which was sought by the Nepali authorities in 1949 is viewed as a sign of an unequal relationship, and an Indian imposition.

    4) Open borders

    • The issue of open borders has also been a point of debate in Nepal in recent years- Nepalese people argue that India is benefiting more from it than Nepal.
    • It has an open border with India which leads to problems such as illegal migrants, counterfeit currency entry, drug and human trafficking.

    5) Madhesis Issue

    • Madhesis share extensive cross-border ethnic and linguistic links with India. India’s involvement in Nepali politics and the upsurge in Madhesi have deep roots in history and unless resolved.
    • Madhesis protest and India’s blockade soured the relations for the worst.

    Way Forward

    • The onus is on India to rethink on a long-term basis how to recalibrate its relationship with Nepal provided Nepal should not ignore its relations with India.
    • Broader engagement from both sides is essential towards finding a solution that satisfies both sides.
    • There are many possible modalities. Maybe it could include joint military deployment, special access rights for Nepali citizens or even a free-trade zone with China.
    • The India-Nepal border issues appear more easily solvable, so long as there is political goodwill and statecraft exercised on both sides.

    The way to move forward is to formally approve the strip maps, resolve the two remaining disputes, demarcate the entire India-Nepal boundary, and speedily execute the work of boundary maintenance.

    Conclusion

    The Indian road was not built overnight and the Nepal government was surely aware and monitoring the situation in Kalapani over the preceding months and years.

    But now the row appears to have reached an impasse. The Nepal PM’s earlier remarks on a solution, with possible road leasing to India, is a welcome step towards de-escalation. As both countries are laying claim to the same piece of land, the time has come for both countries to sit for talks to solve this issue.

    But since then, we have only seen repeated moves from both sides that have raised the temperature, further politicized the issue and thus made the dialogue more difficult. Nepal’s earlier demands were focused on the withdrawal of troops from Kalapani; its recent position now includes the insistence of Limpiyadhura as the headwaters.

    India may continue to defuse the crisis through back channels but this is no longer sustainable as the dispute had become a “permanent irritant” after Nepal’s new map.

    Based on their history of friendly relations and driven by pragmatism, it should not be difficult for India and Nepal to think out of the box and find a practical solution. Delhi and Kathmandu could lead the way to liberate the subcontinent from the sovereignist, nationalist and territorial logic that continues to leave everyone in the region worse off.

     




    References

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/05/india-nepal-border-dispute-200528085916240.html

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-52967452

    https://theprint.in/talk-point/nepal-map-row-has-india-provoked-kathmandu-or-is-china-instigating-trouble-for-new-delhi/426470/

     

    Foreign Policy Watch: India-Nepal

  • [Burning Issue] Tropical Cyclones and India

     

    WMO has applauded the India Meteorological Department’s forecast and updates on super cyclone Amphan as “best practice” as the weather office made a series of predictions that correctly anticipated the path of the cyclone and the associated wind speed.

    The Indian subcontinent is one of the worst affected regions in the world. The subcontinent with a long coastline of 8041 kilometres is exposed to nearly 10 per cent of the world’s tropical cyclones. Of these, the majority of have their initial genesis over the Bay of Bengal and strike the East coast of India. On an average, five to six tropical cyclones form every year, of which two or three could be severe. More cyclones occur in the Bay of Bengal than the Arabian Sea and the ratio is approximately 4:1. Cyclones occur frequently on both the coasts (the West coast – Arabian Sea; and the East coast – Bay of Bengal).

    Context

    The Indian Ocean has made its mark on the global news cycle this year.  The year 2019 was one of the most active North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons on record. There were eight cyclonic storms in and around India—the highest number of cyclones in a single year since 1976.  With Amphan and Nisarga, the year 2020 is also on the same line. The Arabian Sea, usually not known to be prone to cyclones, has had four major cyclones in a few months.

    What are Tropical Cyclones?

    A Tropical cyclone is an intense circular storm that originates over warm tropical oceans and is characterized by low atmospheric pressure, high winds, and heavy rain.

    • Cyclones are formed over slightly warm ocean waters. The temperature of the top layer of the sea, up to a depth of about 60 meters, need to be at least 28°C to support the formation of a cyclone.
    • This explains why the April-May and October-December periods are conducive for cyclones.
    • Then, the low level of air above the waters needs to have an ‘anticlockwise’ rotation (in the northern hemisphere; clockwise in the southern hemisphere).
    • During these periods, there is an ITCZ in the Bay of Bengal whose southern boundary experiences winds from west to east, while the northern boundary has winds flowing east to west.
    • Once formed, cyclones in this area usually move northwest. As it travels over the sea, the cyclone gathers more moist air from the warm sea which adds to its heft.

    Destruction caused by Cyclones

    Cyclones are disastrous in many ways. They do more harm than any good to the coastal areas.

    1) Strong Winds

    • Cyclones are known to cause severe damage to infrastructure through high-speed winds.
    • Very strong winds which accompany a cyclonic storm damages installations, dwellings, communications systems, trees etc., resulting in loss of life and property.

    2) Torrential rains and inland flooding

    • Torrential rainfall (more than 30 cm/hour) associated with cyclones is another major cause of damages. Unabated rain gives rise to unprecedented floods.
    • Heavy rainfall from a cyclone is usually spread over a wide area and cause large scale soil erosion and weakening of embankments.

    3) Storm Surge

    • A Storm surge can be defined as an abnormal rise of sea level near the coast caused by a severe tropical cyclone.
    • As a result of which seawater inundates low lying areas of coastal regions drowning human beings and life stock.
    • It causes eroding beaches and embankments, destroys vegetation and leads to the reduction of soil fertility.

    Some (unexpected) benefits

    Although Tropical cyclones are known for destruction they cause, when they strike they also bestow certain benefits to the climatic conditions of that area such as

    • Relieve drought conditions
    • Carry heat and energy away from the tropics and transport it towards temperate latitudes
    • Maintain a relatively stable and warm temperature worldwide

    Management of Cyclones in India

    In 2005, the country introduced new laws to set up what’s called the National Disaster Management Authority, a central agency charged with one thing: responding to and minimizing the impact of disasters.

    A year later, in 2006, India established a National Disaster Response Force (NDRF), a specialized corps of highly trained men and women focused on disasters such as cyclones and earthquakes. It’s now comprised of almost 25,000 personnel.

    Apart from institutional measures, there are many structural and non-structural measures  that have been taken for effective disaster management of cyclones:

    • The structural measures include construction of cyclone shelters, construction of cyclone-resistant buildings, road links, culverts, bridges, canals, drains, saline embankments, surface water tanks, communication and power transmission networks etc.
    • Non-structural measures like early warning dissemination systems, management of coastal zones, awareness generation and disaster risk management and capacity building of all the stakeholders involved.
    • These measures are being adopted and tackled on State to State basis under National Cyclone Risk Mitigation Project (NCRMP) being implemented through World Bank Assistance.

    Issues in cyclone mitigation

    • Post than pre focus: Disaster management in India is largely confined to post-disaster relief works. It is more about management than loss prevention.
    • Population: One-third of the population in India lives in the coastal area. Most of them are marginalized people who are ill-prepared and unable to cope up with a disaster.
    • Poor response: The warning of a cyclone is not properly communicated between the concerned agencies. In many cases, the warning is not taken seriously by the agencies which cause delayed effort for the prevention of a disaster. This was evident in the recent Ockhi cyclone disaster.
    • Lack of awareness: among people about the impact and magnitude of the disaster. Also what to act during and post disasters.
    • Coordination Issues:There is also a lack of coordination between the local communities for search and rescue missions. Also poor coordination state and center coordination and its agencies.

    What measures need to be taken for mitigation?

    Pre Disaster

    • Provide cyclone forecasting, tracking and warning systems
    • Construction of cyclone shelters, cyclone-resistant buildings, road links, bridges, canals, drains etc.
    • Establishing Early Warning Dissemination System (EWDS) and Capacity building for coastal communities.

    During disaster

    • Cautionary advice should be put out on social platforms urging people to stay safe
    • The perception of people decides the intensity of the disaster. If people take necessary proactive steps to deal with disaster then even the severe disaster can be dealt with minimum damage.
    • Delivery of food and health care via mobile hospitals, with priorities to women child & elders.
    • Protection of the community and their evacuation and quicker response.

    Post-disaster

    • It is vital that the learning from each event is shared nationally, and the capacity of officials and communities to manage disasters built continuously.
    • Among the securities available to individuals in many countries is insurance against property losses. Viable policies should be made available in India too.
    • Providing alternative means of communication, energy and transport just after the disaster.

    Odisha’s success in handling Cyclones

    • In the year 1999, Odisha faced a super cyclone which took almost 15000 lives. Since then, it started to build a robust disaster management system priority basis.
    • As the extremely severe cyclone Amphan inched closer, the Odisha government rolled up its sleeves and took all precautionary measures, including the evacuation of the people to meet its zero causality target.
    • Just as the IMD issued the warning, the Odisha government began its cyclone preparations which included evacuation, movement of people in low-lying areas and kutcha houses to cyclone shelters, safeguarding Rabi crops in mandis, deployment of ODRAF, NDRF teams, among other measures.

    Let’s learn from Odisha success Model

    1. Build a relief infrastructure

    • Until 1999, Odisha didn’t have a well laid out plan for disaster management. Two months after the cyclone hit, the Odisha State Disaster Management Authority was set up, and plans put in place.
    • Around 900 cyclone shelters have been built in vulnerable pockets of the state, with systems in place for the evacuation of hundreds of thousands of people.

    2. Accurate early warning systems

    • The IMD has built an effective service to predict accurate timings of cyclone formation in the Bay of Bengal and when it will make landfall along India’s coastline.
    • This early warning system enables the state to be disaster-ready and to minimize the loss of lives. It’s then crucial that people follow the protocols in place when the warnings come in.

    3. Clear communication plan

    • Roughly 2.6 m text messages were sent to locals in the clear language before cyclone Fani hit, keeping those potentially affected alert.
    • Regular press briefings were made by officials to update people of the approaching cyclone.
    • People were repeatedly advised over all forms of media not to panic and given clear “do and don’ts”. This helped in the record evacuation of 1.2 m people to safe buildings.

    4. Effective co-ordination of groups

    • Preparations to fight the onslaught should involve a number of government agencies, as well as local community groups and volunteers working together.
    • The government’s disaster response forces were pre-positioned in vulnerable locations, food packets for air-dropping were made ready for air force helicopters to drop to people.

    5. Protecting natural defenses

    • Mangroves as usual acted as a natural shield against the impact of cyclones and floods on the coastal areas.
    • Activists have been fighting for the cause of natural protectors like mangroves and salt pans even as flooding incidents regularly occur in the coastal region.

    India in line with Sendai Framework

    Preparedness to manage disaster risks is a continuous and integrated process resulting from a wide range of risk reduction activities. The preparedness not only involves coordinated planning, and reduces duplication of disaster response efforts but also increases the overall effectiveness of such efforts.

    • The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction is the first major agreement of the post-2015 development agenda, with seven targets and four priorities for action.
    • It is a 15-year; voluntary, non-binding agreement that recognizes that the state has the primary role to reduce disaster risk but that responsibility should be shared with other stakeholders including the local government, the private sector, and other stakeholders.
    • In cyclone disasters (like Amphan, Fani), India presented a good example of its disaster preparedness and compliance to the Sendai Framework.
    • Zero casualty policy and the pinpoint accuracy of the IMD’s early warning system helped to reduce the possibility of deaths.

    Way Forward

    • India’s improved and timely forecast for cyclones gives the government opportunity and time to prepare and manage.
    • Better linkages between sectoral ministries and national disaster management authorities needed in countries when it comes to assessing disaster risks.
    • It is important to acknowledge the problem beyond disaster management framing and should be framed as an adaptation need.
    • Now the imperative for India is not only to have infrastructure that is resilient, functional and that can bounce back after a disaster, but also to have infrastructure withstand and be operational during a crisis.
    • For this India need to employ more technology, strict following of command structure, and most importantly the participation and cooperation of local communities in the affected area.

     

    Conclusion

    With the advent of climate change, tropical cyclones are not going ‘anywhere’, rather they are poised to become more frequent and accompanied by increased intensity. Regardless of state support and administrative help, people themselves have to step up to create local solutions using their own practices.

    In this regard, it is necessary to find ways to prevent the cyclones from becoming an unmanageable national disaster.

     




    References

    https://ncrmp.gov.in/cyclones-their-impact-in-india/

    https://vikaspedia.in/social-welfare/disaster-management-1/natural-disasters/cyclones

    https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/what-are-tropical-cyclones-and-super-cyclones/article31657893.ece

    https://scroll.in/article/963805/lessons-from-cyclones-amphan-and-nisarga-for-indias-disaster-management-plan

    https://ndma.gov.in/en/2013-05-03-08-06-02/disaster/natural-disaster/cyclones.html

    https://theconversation.com/indias-cyclone-fani-recovery-offers-the-world-lessons-in-disaster-preparedness-116870

    https://india.mongabay.com/2020/06/leverage-improved-forecast-to-deal-with-disasters/

    https://www.preventionweb.net/educational/view/5482

  • [Burning Issue] Reorienting MGNREGA in times of COVID

    Distribution: ,

     

    Termed in a moment of hubris by present government as ‘“a living monument of UPA’s failures”, the government has fallen back on this Scheme in this moment of crisis. This piece is an attempt to understand the silent success of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) which was allegedly dying a slow death.

    Context

    Due to the sudden lockdown and resultant job losses, over 1 crore people have returned to their homes, some walking hundreds of kilometres, others using all conceivable means of transport. A sizeable number may take several months to return to the cities and towns to earn a living. This extraordinary scenario of a pandemic poses a formidable challenge for the governments of the ‘home states’ to arrange suitable job opportunities for securing their livelihoods.

    In this bleak scenario, MGNREGA is providing a ray of hope.

    The mighty MGNREGA

    • The MGNREGA stands for Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act of 2005.
    • This is labour law and social security measure that aims to guarantee the ‘Right to Work’.
    • The act was first proposed in 1991 by P.V. Narasimha Rao.

    The objectives of the MGNREGA are:

    • To enhance the livelihood security of the rural poor by generating wage employment opportunities.
    • To create a rural asset base which would enhance productive ways of employment, augment and sustain a rural household income.

    Anyways, what is so Unique about it?

    • MGNREGA is unique in not only ensuring at least 100 days of employment to the willing unskilled workers, but also in ensuring an enforceable commitment on the implementing machinery i.e., the State Governments, and providing a bargaining power to the labourers.
    • The failure of provision for employment within 15 days of the receipt of job application from a prospective household will result in the payment of unemployment allowance to the job seekers.
    • Employment is to be provided within 5 km of an applicant’s residence, and minimum wages are to be paid.
    • Thus, employment under MGNREGA is a legal entitlement.

    Constitutional goals of MGNREGA: The idealistic edge

    1) Implementation of DPSP

    • The MGNREGA aims to follow the DPSPs enunciated in Part IV of the Constitution of India.
    • The law by providing a ‘right to work’ is consistent with Article 41 that directs the State to secure to all citizens the right to work.
    • The statute also seeks to protect the environment through rural works which is consistent with Article 48A that directs the State to protect the environment.
    • It also follows Article 46 that requires the State to promote the interests of and work for the economic uplift of the SCs and STs and protect them from discrimination and exploitation.
    • Article 40 mandates the State to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government.
    • Conferring the primary responsibility of implementation on Gram Panchayats, the Act adheres to this constitutional principle.

    2) Implementation of FRs

    • In accordance with the Article 21 of the Constitution of India that guarantees the right to life with dignity to every citizen of India, this act imparts dignity to the rural people through an assurance of livelihood security.
    • The FRs enshrined in Article 16 of the Constitution of India guarantees equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.

    The REAL Issues crippling MGNREGA

    On ground, policies and schemes do depart from their idealistic purposes. Go through these Issues to understand HOW?

    1) Insufficient budgetary allocations – No Money!

    • MGNREGA’s success at the ground level is subject to proper and uninterrupted fund flow to the states.
    • Increase in the nominal budget but actual budget (after adjusting inflation) decreased over the years.
    • Rs 61,500 crore has been allocated for the MGNREGA for the year 2020-21, down by more than 13 per cent from the total estimated expenditure for 2019-20 which was at Rs 71,001.81 crore.

    2) Approved Labour Budget Constraints

    • The Centre through the arbitrary “Approved Labour Budget” has reduced the number of days of work and put a cap on funds through the National Electronic Fund Management System
    • According to Ne-FMS guidelines, states won’t be allowed to generate employment above the limits agreed by Approved labour Budget.

    3) Not so attractive wages rate

    • Currently, MGNREGA wage rates of 17 states are less than the corresponding state minimum wages.
    • The ridiculously low wage rates have resulted in a lack of interest among workers in working for MGNREGA schemes, making way for contractors and middlemen to take control, locally.

    4) Delay in wage (Not so attractive) payments

    • Under the MGNREGA, a worker is entitled to get his or her due wages within a fortnight of completion of work, failing which the worker is entitled to the compensation.
    • As of 2016-17, the total amount of wage pending is Rs. 11000 crore.
    • Even the Gram Rozgar Sevak, who is the backbone of the entire scheme, who works part-time, living in the same village, does not get paid on time.

    5) No-work situations are rising

    • None of the states was able to provide full 100 days employment as mentioned in the scheme.
    • Even though the scheme aims at providing 100 days of guaranteed employment, below 50 days of employment was actually provided an average at an all-India level in FY 18.

    6) Data manipulations by authorities

    • A recent study has found that data manipulation in the MGNREGA is leading to gross violations in its implementation.
    • Numerous ground reports across the country suggest that because of a funds crunch, field functionaries do not even enter the work demanded by labourers in the MGNREGA database.

    7) Non-purposive spending and corruptions

    • Many works sanctioned under MGNREGA often seem to be non-purposive.
    • Quite often, they are politically motivated hotspots to create rampant corruption by dominant sections of the local population.
    • Even social audits of such projects are locally manipulated.

    8) Workers penalized for administrative lapses

    • The ministry withholds wage payments for workers of states that do not meet administrative requirements within the stipulated time period (for instance, submission of the previous financial year’s audited fund statements, utilization certificates, bank reconciliation certificates etc).
    • There is no logical or legal explanation for this bizarre arrangement. It is beyond any logic as to why workers would be penalized for administrative lapses.

    9) Genuine job cards being deleted

    • Genuine job cards are being randomly deleted as there is a huge administrative pressure to meet 100 per cent DBT implementation targets in MGNREGA.
    • In states like Jharkhand, there are multiple examples where the districts had later requested to resume job cards after civil society interventions into the matter.

    10) Too much centralization weakening local governance

    • A real-time MIS-based implementation and a centralised payment system has further left the representatives of the Panchayati Raj Institutions with literally no role in implementation.
    • It has become a burden as they hardly have any power to resolve issues or make payments.

    11)  Local priorities being ignored

    • MGNREGA could be a tool to establish decentralized governance. But, with the administration almost dictating its implementation, it is literally a burden now for the people and especially for the local elected representatives.
    • The Gram Sabhas and gram panchayats’ plans are never honoured. This is a blatant violation of the Act as well.

    Dark Knight Rises: MGNREGA in times of COVID

    Within days, India has realized, political friend and foe alike, right-wing egotist and left-wing activist alike, that the world’s largest social welfare scheme, operationalised by UPA 1 in 2006 is a rare lifeline, almost as if designed for times of extreme adversity.

    The importance of the MGNREGA scheme is now accepted by one and all. No wonder that with its hands tied due to Covid-19 crisis the state governments are struggling to ensure remunerative work in villages for the large workforce.

    The central government, too, after considering all options and in order to provide job support to the large workforce which has or is reaching native villages, has acted rationally and announced another Rs 40,000 crore allocation for the MGNREGA scheme.

    Highest registrations

    • MGNREGA data shows that job demand this May was the highest in eight years even as all the data for May is still pouring in.
    • Over 45 crore person days have been generated (2.63 crore households and 3.6 crore individuals have worked) in the 45 days of 2020-21 since works began on April 20.
    • Traditionally, the months of May and June have always witnessed the highest NREGA work demand because is the lean agriculture season after Rabi harvest and before Kharif sowing.

    Only viable option available

    • MGNREGA appears to be the primary hope of sustaining livelihood in almost all states the during a time of massive reverse migration due to the lockdown imposed in light of COVID-19.
    • MGNREGA is the only viable option at present to provide relief and work to the labourers.

    Some innovation in MGNREGA that can go a long way

    1) Looping in the skilled worker

    • First, there is a suggestion to use it to meet the wage cost of their employment in small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
    • Accordingly, skilled migrant workers may be placed in SMEs and their wages would be charged to MGNREGA.

    2) Including farm related works

    • In the last few years, un-remunerative prices of several crops have been the root cause of widespread agrarian distress.
    • The suggestion is to allow farmers to employ MGNREGA workers in agricultural operations like land preparation, sowing, transplantation of paddy, plucking of cotton, intercultural operations and harvesting of crops etc. so as to reduce the cost of cultivation.
    • The idea is to pay part of the wages of labour in agricultural operations from MGNREGA.

    3) Increasing the number of Work Schemes

    • Currently, there are only 2-3 work schemes (say PMAY) running per panchayat, which is leading to the crowding of workers at worksites.
    • To prevent this and to ensure that all willing households are able to access employment through NREGA, the number of schemes needs to be increased, and 6-8 schemes must be introduced in each village.

    4) Paying Workers Immediately

    • Rural households urgently need cash-in-hand, and so the emerging demand is for immediate payment to workers. NREGA payments are frequently delayed by weeks or months.
    • Given the circumstances, such delays will be entirely counterproductive.
    • It is recommended that in remote areas, wage payments should be made in cash, and paid on the same day.

    5) Modify Daily Workloads

    • In compliance with COVID-19 guidelines, workers are wearing masks and other forms of face protection.
    • NREGA works typically involve hard physical labour and workers are finding it challenging to breathe comfortably while working.
    • Consequently, for as long as workers are required to wear masks, the daily volume of work assigned to them must be reduced.

    6) By increasing Wages

    • If NREGA wages are to effectively support rural households as they cope with this crisis, they must, at a minimum, be at par with states’ agricultural wages.
    • For example, the Government of Odisha has increased the daily-wage rate for unskilled manual work under NREGA to INR 298 per day in its 20 migration-prone blocks.

    7) Increase budgetary allocations

    • The central government’s budgetary allocation of INR 61,500 crore to NREGA for FY 2020-21 is inadequate..
    • An additional Rs 1 lakh crore needs to be allocated so that NREGA can act as a safety net and help rural households cope with the devastating impact of the lockdown.

    Way Forward

    • Large scale social security programmes like MGNREA are subjected to undergo several stumbling blocks in the times of ongoing pandemic.
    • Government and NGOs must study the impact of MGNREGA in rural areas so as to ensure that this massive anti-poverty scheme is not getting diluted from its actual path.
    • Since the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on employment is going to persist in 2020-21, government can ensure more effective implementation and strengthening of the oversight of MGNREGA through mandated social audit.
    • The scheme is not only an ocean of possibilities for the jobless migrants, but it has also given the Central government a chance to get a second bite at the cherry after the devastating economic and job creation figures now officially out for FY 2019-20.

    At this point in time what is needed is neither dismantling of the programme nor its slow suffocation.

    Conclusion

    This week the entire nation saw how teachers in Jaipur started working as MGNREGA labourers amid the pandemic. Unfortunate and not to be celebrated, it nevertheless underlines the importance of MGNREGA as a ray of hope amidst extreme darkness.

    This article has attempted to convey the transformative power of MGNREGA, particularly at a time of economic stress.

    To be clear, MGNREGA cannot substitute deeper and systemic efforts to generate jobs; nor can it address structural weaknesses in the economy. The need of the hour is for the Government to place MGNREGA at the heart of its strategy to tackle this economic emergency.

    The Economic Survey of 2019-20 suggested that MGNREGA offers an early warning signal to detect rural distress. We can help by changing the narrative that has for too long maligned MGNREGA.

    We must view MGNREGA as an opportunity and explicitly include it in a broad-based strategy to tackle the current economic crisis.

     

    Think!

    If the idea is to provide work to anybody demanding it, there should, in principle, be no restrictions on the kind of activities allowed under this scheme. If higher material component helps in building more assets with durable quality, why cannot these projects qualify under the MGNREGA? Why tie it down to particular “permitted works”? What stops MGNREGA labour from being used even to undertake railway or national highway work?




    References

    https://thewire.in/government/mgnrega-wage-payment-delays

    https://www.theindiaforum.in/article/continuing-relevance-mgnrega

    https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/economy/mgnrega-is-failing-10-reasons-why-62035

    https://thewire.in/economy/mgnrega-rural-india-farmers

    https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/mgnrega-demand-rural-labours-migrant-workers-coronavirus-6441371/

    https://www.thequint.com/news/india/how-nrega-can-help-rural-areas-in-times-of-covid-19-distress

  • [Burning Issue] COVID-19 and its Impact on Agriculture

    Subjects: ,
    Distribution: ,

    Farmers in India constantly battle against skewed monsoon and erratic rainfall, extreme natural events, interrupted supply chains and rising inflation. Like this was not enough. These troubles now are supplemented this year by the COVID induced lockdowns and the heralding Locusts Attack!

    God bless our Annadatas!

    Context

    The start of the coronavirus pandemic has coincided with the peak harvesting season. As the markets are locked down, there is a threat to the crop in over 100 lakh hectares in the country.

    Even among the different segments, the impact varies widely among different regions and among producers and agricultural wage labourers. This impact will reverberate across the larger economy and will linger longer than a few months.

    Issues surfaced after COVID pandemic

    In spite of all the measures and in view of continuing restrictions on movements of people and vehicular traffic, concerns have been raised regarding negative implications of COVID19 pandemic on the farm economy. The immediate problems in agriculture at the moment are primarily categorized under two heads:

    A. Impact on Global Agriculture

     

    1) Crop production and availability of seeds

    • For crop production, the largest part of the seeding process will be almost unaffected between now and the summer.
    • So there would be no impact as such on seeds availability for now.
    • But if the same scenario continues till year end, then surely seed availability can be an issue.

    2) Fertilizers shortage

    • Due to global trade disturbance, farmers are facing the shortage of agricultural inputs like fertilizer and pesticides.
    • In a shorter span, there is little shortage to be expected.
    • In the longer term, the delivery of fertilizer via international markets may become a problem since some of the production plants in China have been shut down.

    3) On food production and distribution

    • Most of the countries have taken measures such as home confinement, travel bans and business closure to control the rate of infection.
    • Agriculture produce is mostly perishable in nature, so farmers are compelled to hold their unsold produce for a longer period of time.
    • This has led to a reduction in food quality as well as an increase in the cost of production.

    4) On livestock

    • Different agricultural sector such as  livestock and fishery have been hit hard by the pandemic.
    • In India, COVID-19 has caused a higher impact on livestock farming due to limited access to animal feed and a shortage of labour.
    • For example, the travel ban has affected the delivery of breeding stock of poultry.

    5) On workers

    • Agricultural workers in low and middle-income countries lack proper health services and social protection and due to little saving or no saving.
    • Many informal workers in agriculture are obligate to work for their sustenance despite the self-isolation protocol during COVID-19 pandemic.

    6) Impact on food demand and food security

    • The demand for food has affected due to reduction in income and purchasing capacity.
    • Panicked Consumers are stock piling the foods which in turn has affected the food availability and price.
    • Due to the decline in international trade, disturbance in food supply chain and food production, food insecurity may arise.

    B. Impact on India

    Agriculture contributes about 17 per cent to Indian GDP. Agriculture, with its allied sectors, is the largest source of livelihoods in India. 70 percent of rural households still depend primarily on agriculture for their livelihood.

    1) Peak harvest with no procurement

    • This is the peak of Rabi season in India and crops like wheat, gram, lentil, mustard, etc. (including paddy in irrigated tracts) were at a harvestable stage or almost reaching maturity.
    • This is also the time when the farm harvests reach the mandis for assured procurement operations by designated government agencies.

    2) Labour unavailability due to reverse migration

    • The non-availability of labour has hurt operations in many parts.
    • Consequently, the shortage of migrant labour has resulted in a sharp increase in daily wages for harvesting crops.
    • Some parts of agriculture that have the luxury of deploying technology for harvestings, like Paddy and Wheat, are relatively more insulated since they often do not have to depend on large numbers of manual labour.

    3) Fall in prices

    • Agricultural prices have collapsed due to lack of market access including the stoppage of transportation and closure of borders.
    • The rise in labour costs and lack of access means that farmers are staring at huge losses and hence allowing crops to rot in the fields, a better ‘stop-loss’ mechanism.

    4) Scarcity of public goods

    • Making the food grains, fruits and vegetables and other essential items available to consumers, both in rural and urban areas, is the most critical challenge.
    • Transportation of public distribution system (PDS) items to last-mile delivery agents, by both rail and road, has been severely impacted in the beginning.

    5) Restrictions on Sale

    • There were self-imposed restrictions on the inter- and intra-State movements of farmers/labourers, as well as harvesting and related farm machines.

    6) Disruptions in supply-chain

    • The absence of transport facilities clubbed with vigilant blocking roads has a limiting effect on the movement of migratory harvest labour and agri-machinery.
    • Also, trucks and tractors are not inclusive of ‘farm machinery’ by definition..

    7) Lockdown induced debt and Cash Flow Constraints

    • The most important issue that farmers have to surmount is the problem of repaying their crop loans, gold loans and other informal debts.
    • Crop loans are repaid between April and May and a fresh loan is granted at the onset of a new season.
    • Any failure to do so will mean that they will be forced to borrow money from the informal sector at high rates of interest for the new season.

     

    Impact on Food Security

    • Border closures, quarantines, and market, supply chain and trade disruptions are restricting people’s access to sufficient/diverse and nutritious sources of food, especially in countries hit hard by the virus or already affected by high levels of food insecurity.
    • In slowdown times, as demand for food will decrease over the next months, prices should go down in 2020, and this will have a negative impact on farmers and the agricultural sector.
    • As of now, disruptions have been minimal as food supply has been adequate and markets have been stable so far to meet the ongoing demands (though skewed)..

    Indian response to Covid: Agriculture version

    The Center and State Governments have worked in harmony to redress the grievances of farmers. Both have introduced a series of measures every day such as subsidies, including crop insurance to farmers, free flow of agricultural credit, unemployment allowance to rural landless/migrant workers under MANREGA, etc.

    The govt. is using every arrow in its quiver to ensure the health of farmers by continuously sensitizing the farmers about working in fields with covered faces while maintaining social distancing.

    In order to reinforce a zero hurdle harvest season, the govt has exempted the movement of farm machinery from lockdown.

    1) Reforms in e-NAM

    • The new features of National Agriculture Market platform were introduced as a welcoming move to decongest mandis.
    • They aim to strengthen agriculture marketing by reducing the need for farmers to physically access the wholesale mandis for selling their harvested produce.

    2) Technological support

    • Kisan Sabha App developed by CSIR to connect farmers to supply chain and freight transportation management system was recently launched to support farmers during the lockdown.
    • The app aims to provide the most economical and timely logistics support to the farmers and increase their profit margins by minimizing the interference of middlemen and directly connecting with the institutional buyers.
    • Kisan Rath app was also launched to facilitate farmers & traders in searching for transport vehicles for movement of Agriculture & Horticulture produce.

    3) Boost to Contract farming

    • Various states have promoted innovative model allowing investors and farmers to enter into an agreement for contract farming in view of the continuing uncertainties due to the pandemic.
    • For example, the Consumer-Farmer Compact in Telangana has been ensuring food availability and access in COVID-19 times.
    • In this system, the consumers support farmers with their agricultural needs; in return, farmers ensure consumers are able to access food in a hassle-free manner.

    4) Allocations for direct transfers

    • Increasing the allocations for DBT to farmers through PM KISAN and including everyone who is actively undertaken during the lockdown.
    • This has helped most farming families to be partially compensated for the losses seen in months of March and April.
    • It has provided them with some cushion against the deflationary effect seen on farm-prices due to the prolonged lockdown.

    Future scope of reforms

    1) Focussing on Alternative Market Channels

    • The alternative market channel works on the principles of decentralisation and direct-to-home delivery.
    • The idea is to create smaller, less congested markets in urban areas with the participation of farmers’ groups and Farmer Producer Companies (FPCs) so that farmers have direct access to consumers.
    • It may provide a valuable option against the lockdown when efforts to avoid crowding in the wholesale markets are likely to continue.

    2) Reforming APMC

    • With these reforms, the government has also set in motion plans to dismantle the decades-old monopolies of state-run APMCs, that were often blamed for unfair trading, and had become a barrier for farmers to get a fair price on their produce.
    • There is an urgent need for abolishing or reframing the APMC Act and encourage direct buying of agri-produce from farmers/farmer producer organisations (FPOs).
    • The companies, processors, organised retailers, exporters, consumer groups, that buy directly from FPOs need not pay any market fee as they do not avail the facilities of APMC yards.

    3) Designating warehouses as markets

    • The warehouse receipt system can be scaled up.
    • The private sector should be encouraged to open mandis with modern infrastructure, capping commissions.

    4) Logistics transformation

    • To sustain the demand for agricultural commodities, investments in key logistics must be enhanced.
    • Moreover, e-commerce and delivery companies and start-ups need to be encouraged with suitable policies and incentives.
    • The small and medium enterprises, running with raw materials from the agriculture and allied sector or otherwise, also need special attention so that the rural economy doesn’t collapse.

    5) Institutionalizing farm labour

    • To obviate the immediate concerns of the scarcity of farm labour, policies must facilitate easy availability of machinery through state entities, Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) or custom hiring centres (CHCs) with suitable incentives.
    • It is also suggested to explore leveraging NREGS funds to pay part of the farm labour (with farmers paying the balance wage amount) to lessen the monetary burden on the farmer while ensuring wage employment to the landless labourers and workers.

    6) Expanding institutional lending

    • As the Kharif (rainy/wet) season is fast approaching, institutional lending of crop loans should be expanded and facilitated for smooth (and sufficient) flow of credit to borrowing farmers.
    • Agri-inputs – seeds, fertilizers, agro-chemicals, etc. – have to be pre-positioned for easy availability. The private sector must play a significant role in necessary policy support.

    Future of Agriculture in India

    Indian agriculture is in a way, a victim of its own past success – especially the green revolution…..

    1) Farming as a Viable Livelihood

    • Agriculture is dying, not as in the production of food but as a desirable profession.
    • One bad yield, whether due to errant rains, pests, etc., and most farmers have no buffer available.
    • The last point worth considering is that food and agriculture are not the same. Expenditures on food span the value-add, including processing, preparation, service in restaurants, etc.
    • Farmers in India merely get paid for their product and not for the food we eat.

    2) Rainbow revolution holds the key

    • The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity.
    • Data reveals that India’s average yield of cereal per hectare is far less than that of many countries. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation.
    • In order to cross the declining productivity barrier, there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from the wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses.
    • However, this is not sufficient and has to be complemented with a huge investment in public infrastructure.

    3) Per drop more crop

    • The second major barrier is the scarcity of two major resources for agriculture – cultivable land and water.
    • While the cultivable land per person is declining because of the fragmentation of farms due to the rising population.
    • India also has much less per capita water available  as compared to other leading agrarian countries.
    • Given this scenario, it is time to make a shift to micro-irrigation so that the efficient and judicious use of scarce water resources can be made.

    4) R&D is the future

    • One of the major barriers to boosting farm productivity is the lack of new technologies and major breakthroughs post the green revolution.
    • While the National Agriculture Research System played a major role in the green revolution, in recent years there hasn’t been any major breakthrough in research.
    • One of the main reasons for this is the lack of financial resources.
    • There has also not been any major contribution from the private sector towards research and development.
    • The government should thus woo private players by giving them incentives to play a major role in agricultural research and development.

    Way Forward

    • With a burgeoning population, there is a corresponding rise in food demand in India.
    • A post-COVID situation offers that unique opportunity to repurpose the existing food and agriculture policies for a healthier population.
    • India, being trade-surplus on commodities like rice, meat, milk products, tea, honey, horticultural products, etc. may seize the opportunities by exporting such products with a stable agri-exports policy.
    • Development of export-supportive infrastructure and logistics would need investments and support of the private sector that will be in the long term interests of farmers in boosting their income.
    • This is indeed good news in the COVID scenario, assuming agriculture can practice largely unscathed.
    • Designing agricultural policies, post-COVID scenario, must include these imperatives for a food systems transformation in India.
    • Immediately, the govt. should focus on the coming Kharif cropping season, especially ensuring timely availability of seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, credit and other inputs.

    Conclusion

    Structural reforms such as land leasing, contract farming and private agricultural markets, etc. have long been advocated to bring enhanced investments into the agriculture sector and to push its growth. However, there has not been the uniform implementation of these legislations by State Governments and so the full potential of the sector is unrealized. These reforms need significant political will.

    The end of the lockdown will not end the problems. On the contrary, they are likely to be compounded at the onset of the new agricultural sowing season. There is a greater need for government support in the form of support for other agricultural inputs. Lack of any relief will only make the agricultural crisis worse. The need of the hour is to maximise possibilities of agriculture, which has demonstrated its utility and resilience in trying times.

     

     

     




    References

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/alleviating-the-farmers-pain/

    https://www.icrisat.org/containing-covid19-impacts-on-indian-agriculture/

    https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/covid-19-impact-on-agriculture-varied-and-devastating-828390.html

    https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/india-agriculture-sector-crisis-corona-impact-on-farmers-niti-aayog-6392233/

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/story/agricultural-marketing-reforms/

    https://thewire.in/agriculture/what-is-the-future-of-agriculture-in-india

    http://www.fao.org/2019-ncov/q-and-a/impact-on-food-and-agriculture/en/

  • [Burning Issue] National Security Law debate in Hong Kong

    Hong Kong is burning again. Last year it was Fugitive Offenders Amendment bill, now it’s National Security Law. This anthem bill criminalises insulting China’s national anthem. No, this is not like the same dictum given to us by Supreme Court to stand up in multiplexes. But people actually fear that this law will take away Hong Kong’s basic freedoms.

    Context

    Chinese lawmakers have approved a proposal for sweeping new national security legislation in Hong Kong, which democracy advocates say will curb essential freedoms in the city.

    About Hong Kong

    • A former British Colony and Autonomous Territory: Hong Kong is an autonomous territory, and a former British colony, in southeastern China.
    • It became a colony of the British Empire at the end of the First Opium War in 1842.
    • Sovereignty over the territory was returned to China in 1997.
    • Special Administrative Region (SAR): As a SAR, Hong Kong maintains governing power and economic systems that are separate from those of mainland China.
    • The 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration guarantees the Basic Law for 50 years after the transfer of sovereignty.
    • It does not specify how Hong Kong will be governed after 2047.
    • Thus, the central government’s role in determining the territory’s future system of government is the subject of political debate and speculation in Hong kong.

    The ‘Basic Law’

    • One country, two systems: Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China.
    • It has observed a “one country, two systems” policy since Britain returned sovereignty to China on July 1, 1997, which has allowed it retain certain freedoms, the rest of China does not have.
    • Basic Law: It is governed by a mini-constitution called the Basic Law – constitutional document is a product of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.
    • Under this, China promised to honour Hong Kong’s liberal policies, the system of governance, an independent judiciary, and individual freedoms for a period of 50 years from 1997.

    Why is Hong Kong fuming?

    • The handover agreement gave Hong kong special freedoms of press, speech, and assembly for at least 50 years.
    • These freedoms stand in stark contrast to China’s strict censorship and Jinping’s tight grip on power, which have seen dissidents jailed and interrogated in secret prisons.
    • This is why protesters here are desperate to protect their freedoms — because they fear Hong Kong to become just another Chinese city under Xi’s rule.

    China vs. Basic Law

    • Mini-constitution: Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, the Basic Law, says that ultimately both the leader and the Legislative Council should be elected in a more democratic way – but there’s been disagreement over what this should look like.
    • China dominated system: The Chinese government said in 2014 it would allow voters to choose their leaders from a list approved by a pro-Beijing committee, but critics called this a “sham democracy” and it was voted down in Hong Kong’s legislature.
    • Issue: The new proposal is also controversial because it is expected to circumvent Hong Kong’s own law-making processes – leading to accusations that Beijing is undermining Hong Kong’s autonomy.

    Why Hong Kong matters for China?

    • Legitimacy to PLA: The handover of Hong Kong by Great Britain was a major achievement of the CCP and had helped boost the party’s legitimacy.
    • Extending nationalism: The handover strengthened nationalism debates within Chinese society and was perceived as righting the wrongs of the century of humiliation.
    • Since 1978, the basic tenet of the CCP has been reform and liberalisation of the economic sphere and command and control of the political sphere.
    • Political reform (So-called): Today, after more than 40 years of reform, mainland China is yet to witness any breakthrough in political reform.
    • Beijing expects other countries to acknowledge that there exists only one China.

    The National Security Law

    • Under Article 23 of the Basic Law, Hong Kong has to enact a national security law “to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, and subversion against the Chinese government.”
    • When the Hong Kong government first tried to enact the law in 2003, the issue became a rallying point for the city-wide protests which occurred that year.
    • Since then, the government has steered clear of introducing the legislation again.

    Unrest in Hong Kong

    • Banning Sedition: The new law would ban seditious activities that target mainland Chinese rule, as well as punish external interference in Hong Kong affairs.
    • Many expect a revival of the protests that rocked the city last year.
    • China, on the other hand, has sought support and understanding of India and other countries for its controversial decision as a precautionary measure.

    Rise of Taiwanese aspirations and Domino Effect

    • The upsurge in Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement is more closely linked to the developments in Taiwan than is commonly acknowledged.
    • The Taiwanese election results have given hope to the pro-democracy supporters in Hong Kong.
    • However, to imagine that Beijing will stop interfering in the territory’s domestic sociopolitical space is perhaps over-optimistic.
    • National unity and the “One China Principle” are core issues of the Chinese communist party (CCP).
    • Hong Kong, however, is already seen as a part of China under the “one country, two systems” formula.

    implications of the Security Law across the globe

    China’s authoritarianism stands exposed in Hong Kong and its assertiveness seriously damages its soft power. The developments in Hong Kong, therefore, have global consequences for Beijing’s search of power and legitimacy.

    On Hong Kong

    • Hong Kong is a global financial hub – so a hit to its economy affects business worldwide as well.
    • Experts warn that if the unrest continues, international companies could look to pull out of Hong Kong and relocate their branches elsewhere.
    • The stock market would likely crash, followed by the housing market. A mass exodus could follow, and other countries could see migrants’ incoming from Hong Kong.
    • Many Hong Kongers hold foreign passports, a legacy of 1997, and it is easy for them to move overseas.
    • On a more abstract level, some people have framed the unrest as a tug-of-war between Chinese authoritarianism and the Western ideals of freedom and democracy.

    India’s concerns

    • India and Hong Kong have signed a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).
    • It gives protection against double taxation to over 1,500 Indian companies and businesses that have a presence in Hong Kong.
    • Hong Kong is similarly host to a large number of Indian companies and professionals in banking, IT and shipping.
    • India was Hong Kong’s third-largest export market (after China and the US) in 2017 and Hong Kong was India’s third-largest export market (after the US and the UAE).
    • Hong Kong has a very well established Indian diaspora and has much wealth and business influence within the territory.

    India and Chinese diplomatic take(Informal take)

    • Possibly due to its leadership’s idolization of communism, India for long-neglected the basic principle of reciprocity in its relationship with China.
    • India has consistently upheld the “One China” policy. It was one of the first countries to recognise Tibet as a part of China.
    • Today, India is a democracy and only has to deal with the Kashmir issue.
    • But China is facing resistance movements in Tibet, Xinjiang and Southern Mongolia. Hong Kong and Taiwan, too, remain a concern for Beijing.
    • This makes Delhi’s One-China policy lopsided in terms of diplomacy.
    • China expects India to remain silent on 60 per cent of the contested area under China’s territorial control, and also Hong Kong and Taiwan, while China refuses to stand with India only on Kashmir.

    Way forward

    • China and India should never let their differences shadow the overall bilateral ties and must enhance mutual trust.
    • India’s firm military and diplomatic posturing for the ongoing border dispute has made it clear to Beijing that India is in for the long haul.
    • Given its own problems at home and the focus on Hong Kong over the coming days, de-escalation on its borders with India suits China well.

    Conclusion

    China under Xi’s leadership is one of the most assertive and aggressive powers the world has encountered in a long time. Hong Kong’s protest has been continuing for a long time now. Not just Hong Kongers but even India feels the heat of Dragon’s assertiveness on borders. No one knows the result yet but it is going to be long fight that is for sure.

     



    References

    https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/how-china-is-seeking-more-control-on-hong-kong/

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-48607723

    https://www.epw.in/engage/article/hong-kongs-basic-law-and-history-popular-protest

    https://swarajyamag.com/world/as-china-seeks-support-on-hong-kong-india-has-the-opportunity-to-revive-relations-on-new-terms

    https://www.livemint.com/Politics/IiMAWzG8C7MRi85S9OSoUO/Hong-Kong-can-be-Indias-gateway-to-China-Gautam-Bambawale.html

    https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/china-revisionism-hongkong-india-borders-67086/

  • [Burning Issue] Rise of Economic Nationalism

    Distribution: ,

    “Globalization presumes sustained economic growth. Otherwise, the process loses its economic benefits and political support.”

    Paul Samuelson

    Context

    Guess what Corona virus pandemic did that even Soviet union could not? It has shown the world decaying of the capitalist system. Spread of the virus has lead to various forms of lock downs across the globe. This caused multiple problems in economic globalisation to erupt, which made each country look to the protection of its “own” economy. Now this funda of “own” economy and local over global is what we will focus upon. So stay tuned.

    Is it the end of Globalization?

    Globalization As We Know It Is Dead - Bold Business

    One of the devastating impacts of Covid-19 will be that nations are going to look even more inwards. Rather than look beyond its borders, nations will focus on their narrowly-defined national interests.

    • Reflecting on the debate on globalization, one may wonder whether the world was entering a new, uncharted territory or if Covid-19 was simply accelerating a push-back against globalization that has been taking place for some time with the rise of economic nationalism across countries.
    • Here’s a hint: Globalization has undeniably been in retreat for some years now and the coronavirus pandemic is likely to exacerbate this process.

    Dawn of Economic Nationalism

    What is Economic Nationalism?

    • Economic nationalism, also called economic patriotism and economic populism, is an ideology that favours state interventionism over other market mechanisms.
    • It connotes not only controls of external relations, but also to mobilize internal resources.
    • It tends to see international trade as zero-sum, where the goal is to derive relative gains (as opposed to mutual gains).

    What happens in a nationalist economy?

    • Economic nationalism tends to emphasize industrialization (and often aids industries with state support), due to beliefs that industry has positive spillover effects on the rest of the economy, enhances the self-sufficiency and political autonomy of the country, and is a crucial aspect in building military power.
    • It imbibes policies such as domestic control of the economy, labour, and capital formation, even if this requires the imposition of tariffs and other restrictions on the movement of labour, goods and capital.

    Its evolution – A walk into the past

    • References to economic nationalism appeared initially in the years following World War I when the international economy was subjected to high stress arising out of the economic and political dislocation inherited from the war.
    • A similar explanation of the term followed after the Second World War.
    • In this period, economic protectionism was seen as an alternative to revive damaged economies after the world war.
    • The role and status of the ‘state’ emerged to be essentially important in managing economic affairs. The Soviet Union presented a model where state planning was central.
    • Under this model where the state has been the prime facilitator of, means of production and distribution, the public, as well as the private sector, growing at the same rate.
    • This model consolidated the idea of economic nationalism against that of western inherited capitalism.

    Facets of Economic Nationalism: “ME FIRST”

    Proof that economic Nationalism existed way before the COVID era.

    1) American Protectionism

    • America First: USA remains the main proponent of economic nationalism, under the “America First” doctrine of the Trump administration.
    • US-China Tussle: Trade war had been launched through the imposition of tariffs and China’s plan for economic and technological development had been declared an existential threat to US national security.
    • It has been accompanied by a series of bans on Chinese telecom companies and the launching of a global campaign by the US to have its allies exclude the Chinese company, Huawei, from the development of 5G networks.

    2) Chinese Expansionism

    • China’s strategy is, of course, no different than the one pursued by the US.
    • Backed by its great economic and military might, China seeks to achieve the same objectives using its economic prowess and its pole position in the global manufacturing chain to achieve the said objectives.
    • The ambitious ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ is the testimony of its economic nationalism.

    3) EU contractionist tendencies

    • Brexit: Classic example of economic nationalism.
    • Europe, too is taking a turn towards economic nationalism.
    • Many EU countries have been vocal as saying “in the long term we cannot depend on Asia, on China for goods that are strategic for us, whether in the aerospace or medical sectors or in other supply chains.”

    4) India’s ‘self-reliance’ Mantra of being ‘Vocal about Local’

    • When PM romped to a massive and decisive victory in 2014, neo liberal globalists believed that India would unflinchingly embrace globalisation and undertake economic reforms.
    • Indeed, at global forums, India often batted for economic globalisation, slammed rising trade protectionism.
    • The late Arun Jaitley, in his 2018 budget, admitted to this when he made a “calibrated departure” from the decades-long policy of cutting tariff rates.
    • But there has been a bit of economic nationalism here as well.
    • The resolve to augment domestic manufacturing in India – ‘Make in India’ campaign is a case for local over global.
    • Earlier, India chickened out at the last minute from joining the 16 members RCEP agreement to protect local industry.
    • Likewise, the central government has decided that it will not buy goods or services valued less than 200 crore rupees from global companies.
    • The recent amendment of the FDI rules by India so as to discourage Chinese investment in India – something that may not be consistent with India’s WTO obligations – also smacks of protectionism.

    Why there is a rise in the popularity of Economic Nationalism?

    • Not all countries benefited equally from the economic liberalism of the 1990s. It had its winners and losers.
    • National economic recoveries, i.e., nationalistic interests, have proved out to be paramount in the worldwide pandemic.
    • Economic nationalism to some extent can provide the framework within which economic development is possibly providing a way for savings to accumulate and investment to grow.
    • Goods when made locally help to protect local entrepreneurs, reduce imports and one can attract foreign investment.

    Issues with Economic Nationalism

    • Becoming too nationalistic at the expense of one’s trading partners can be counterproductive.
    • It is an approach that creates conflict. Being more nationalistic tends to be a zero-sum game in an increasingly interdependent world economy, where countries depend on other countries for their economic and political and national security well being.
    • When companies cooperate, they can become more competitive.
    • When they are more competitive, they hire more workers, pay higher salaries, and otherwise contribute to economic growth.
    • ‘Vocal about local’ epitomizes this trade protectionism and pushes a flawed and oversimplified economic logic that domestic manufacturing can be resurrected by actively encouraging (even forcing) customers to buy products ‘made in India’.
    • However, the policy measures adopted to achieve this goal are unsound as they mark a relapse to protectionism.
    • India’s economic experience of the first four decades after independence amply demonstrates that a protectionist and a highly controlled economic model do not yield a competitive and proficient manufacturing sector.

    Analysis from India’s perspective

    The government evidently wants to strengthen local businesses and make them globally competitive so that India can become the next manufacturing hub, like China. The prime minister has perhaps taken the disruption caused by the pandemic as an opportunity to push India towards developing its manufacturing prowess and emulate China’s export-driven rise.

    Economic Nationalism – chequered past in India

    • Era of license-permit raj, umbrella of protectionism and import substitution lead to lack of competition and inefficiency in domestic businesses.
    • The economy suffered a distortion that led to eventual bankruptcy and brought India to the brink of defaulting on international debt obligations in 1991.

    Is India ready to go down that path again?

    • If localisation is an increasingly popular global policy response to the lessons taught by the pandemic, it is not clear how India may suddenly become the next manufacturing powerhouse.
    • India doesn’t already dominate global supply chains, lacks the manufacturing prowess of China and is faced with a world where countries are busy ring-fencing risks and pulling up the drawbridge.
    • The danger is that in its push towards becoming more self-reliant and promotes domestic manufacturing; India may end up taking an even more unequivocally protectionist turn.

    Some problems to solve before we head to the nationalist road

    Problem I- India’s inherent- Investment problem

    • Today, globalisation is seen from the lens of the recipients of foreign investments.
    • The receivers of foreign inflows are at the centre of things, the nuclei around which capital revolves.
    • The power of FDI destinations will grow in the near future, as MNCs try to combat the twin pressures of protectionism and localisation.
    • To achieve its ambitions, nations will simultaneously try to woo foreign investment despite the growing nationalism.
    • In fact, economic xenophobia will become the means to do so in perverted and inverse globalisation.
    • As was the case with Make in India—and now Make in Thailand and Make in Vietnam—nations will want MNCs to invest capital and introduce technology in faraway destinations.

    Problem II- Structural Reforms And Labour Lessons needed

    • To cast a ‘nationalistic’ obligation on them to boost domestic industry instead of undertaking reforms that would improve the domestic industry’s competitiveness is fallacious.
    • Moreover, to expect the world to buy goods ‘made in India’ when we close our markets to foreign goods would be like living in a fool’s paradise!
    • The coming decade will be dominated by automation, robotics, AI, 3D printing and smart techniques that will aid economic nationalism, protectionism and localisation.
    • This marks the end of the ‘Age of Industrial Revolution’, and ushers in Industry 5.0.
    • Post-crisis, nations will seek opportunities to reform and change labour as well as laws that govern it. Some, like India, will hope to please businesses at the expense of labour.
    • Recently several states increased the work hours in factories and made it easier to sack workers and more difficult to form trade unions.

    Way Forward

    • India should work to strike a balance between making itself an integral part of the global supply chain (like China) while promoting local industries and empowering small businesses so that they can compete with the world’s best.
    • The focus must be making India a very competitive nation so that our local companies, products and services are purchased by the domestic consumers as well as enthusiastically by consumers around the world.
    • One aspect of being resilient is that our local companies are as competitive as possible.
    • India’s competitiveness will be unshackled not by clamping down on imports and asking consumers to go local, buy local and promote local.
    • Rather, small businesses and local producers will become more efficient and even globally recognised in a competitive environment aided by a government that makes doing business easier.
    • Until that transformation happens the argument that we can suddenly become world-beaters by turning self-sufficient is not convincing.

    For the World to do better,

    • The rhetoric of global power cannot suddenly change to the globe of power.
    • Squeezing the global economy through individual version of protectionism is lethal at the moment.
    • The world may not spend time deliberating the merits and demerits of globalization after the pandemic is contained. But, it should work together for a common and larger objective and approach for all.
    • Only structural reforms, not the dismantling of present architecture  can do best to resolve these issues.
    • India and other developing countries should  work together to reform the present WTO structure for everyone’s  benefit and particularly for the ones which are disadvantaged.
    • The need of the hour is to explore the relationship between comparative advantage and optimal trade policy where all countries are relatively benefited.

    Conclusion

    Nationalist moves are crucial because they will allow nations to reduce dependence on exports and foreign markets, curtail imports or foreign suppliers and enhance economic nationalism through local consumption of domestic goods and services.

    But obviously we do not want trade wars. Covid has also taught us the necessity of international collaboration and co-operation. Unlike US and China, India cannot afford to pursue such obscure economic approaches. We may end up making a terrible mistake if we consider international trade to be a zero-sum game.

    Instead of turning its back on globalisation, India should play a leadership role in strengthening the international economic architecture, which populists in the West want to demolish, premised on a win-win relationship that produces mutual prosperity and global peace.

     

    Try this:

    Q. Dadabhai Naoroji was the first to realize the significance of Economic Nationalism in the early phase of nationalists awakening. Elucidate.




    References

    https://www.firstpost.com/india/is-this-government-pushing-india-back-to-the-indira-era-idea-of-economic-nationalism-will-work-only-if-backed-by-structural-reform-8377681.html

    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/04/21/pers-a21.html

    https://thewire.in/political-economy/can-india-compete-with-china-in-the-post-covid-19-world https://thewire.in/economy/india-global-trade-vocal-about-local

    https://www.orfonline.org/research/post-covid-nations-will-look-inwards-india-should-look-at-neighbourhood-ex-nsa-66318/

    https://www.opindia.com/2020/05/china-australia-usa-netherlands-japan-kazakhstan-kyrgystan-economy-manufacturing-coronavirus/

    https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/business-news-why-china-india-will-suffer-the-worst-economic-disaster-in-almost-a-100-years/303222

  • [Burning Issue] India-China Skirmish in Ladakh

    “Hindi Chini bhai bhai” – The tale of these brothers is filled with so much action and drama that it can give Bollywood writers a run for money. See, border issues is never easy to resolve, never has been and never will be. Pangong Tso or Doklam – All point to Troubled LAC and an aggressive neighbour, which is a tough combination for India. Let’s dive into this article to learn about the border skirmishes.

    Current Incidents

    On May 5, around 250 Indian and Chinese army personnel clashed with iron rods, sticks, and even resorted to stone-pelting in the Pangong Tso lake area of Ladakh, in which soldiers on both sides sustained injuries. In a separate incident, nearly 150 Indian and Chinese military personnel were engaged in a face-off near Naku La Pass in the Sikkim sector on May 9. At least 10 soldiers from both sides sustained injuries.

    After Chinese accusation of Indian Army’s border transgressions and strong Indian pushback, Ladakh has become a new festering point for the Sino-Indian relations.

    A deeper look into reasons of present tensions

    • The stand-off in Galwan valley, according to reports, was triggered by China moving in troops and equipment to stop construction activity by India.
    • Delhi claims that it was well within India’s side of the LAC. The LAC was thought to be settled in this area which has not seen many incidents in the past, but China now appears to think otherwise.
    • The northern bank of Pangong lake has, however, been a point of contention where there are differing perceptions of the LAC.
    • The Sikkim incident is unexpected as the contours of the LAC are broadly agreed to in this sector.
    • Unofficial reason: The broader context for the tensions appears to be a changing dynamic along the LAC, as India plans to catch-up in improving infrastructure there.

    Some old bruises in border relations

    • India and China do not have a well-defined border, and troop face-offs are common along its 3,500 km Line of Actual Control (LAC), though not a bullet has been fired for four decades.
    • After the 1962 Sino-Indian war, one of the longest standoffs between the Indian and Chinese armies happened at Sumdorongchu (near the Bhutan tri-junction) in 1986, when the troops had an eye-to-eye stalemate.
    • In 2017, at Doklam, near the same Bhutan tri-junction, the troops of India and China were engaged in a 73-day stand-off, triggering fears of a war between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.

    The Gandhi-Deng bargain

      • A year after a military skirmish between India and China in the Sumdorong Chu Valley in Arunachal Pradesh, then PM Rajiv Gandhi visited his counterpart Deng Xiaoping in Beijing to mend ties.
      • The two leaders agreed to establish a forward-looking relationship but border dispute were temporarily set aside.
      • The reason for this pragmatism was rooted in economic and strategic factors: Both China and India needed a stable external environment to promote domestic economic development.
      • China was already a decade into the dramatic economic reforms that Deng had initiated, while Gandhi’s India had also embarked on a similar path.
      • The Gandhi-Deng bargain paved the way for a number of border management agreements (including the 1993 and 1996 agreements related to confidence-building measures.

    Then, Why do face-offs occur so frequently?

    • Basic: Face-off and stand-off situations occur along the LAC in areas where India and China have overlapping claim lines. The LAC has never been demarcated.
    • The boundary in the Sikkim sector is broadly agreed but has not been delineated.
    • Face-offs occur when patrols encounter each other in the contested zones between overlapping claim lines.
    • Protocols agreed to in 2005 and 2013 detail rules of engagement to prevent such incidents, but have not always been adhered to.

    What are the various sectors on the India-China border?

    • The border can be broadly divided into three sectors—Western, Middle and Eastern.
    • The Western sector, which includes Ladakh, is governed by the Johnson Line, making Aksai Chin (controlled by China) in Jammu and Kashmir contested territory for India.
    • The Middle sector, consisting of Uttarakhand and Himachal, is relatively tranquil. Even map exchanges between the two countries have taken place, based on a broad understanding of borders.
    • In the Eastern Sector (where Indian controls territory based on the MacMahon Line), China claims Arunachal Pradesh as part of southern Tibet, while India contests it.
    • The MacMahon Line was drawn at the tripartite 1913-14 Simla Convention attended by British India, Tibet and China; the problem: Tibet is involved and China is not a signatory to this pact.

    LAC: Why no solution yet?

    • It’s not like nothing has been done!
    • Maps have been exchanged in the Middle Sector, but the exercise fell through in the Western Sector where divergence is the greatest.
    • China has rejected this exercise, viewing it as adding another complication to the on-going boundary negotiations.
    • India’s argument is rather than agree on one LAC, the exercise could help both sides understand the claims of the other, paving the way to regulate activities in contested areas until a final settlement of the boundary dispute.

    Also, Chinese transgressions are frequent: Dragon’s aggressiveness

    • A higher number indicates that the Chinese soldiers are coming to the Indian side more often, and their movements are being observed and recorded by the Indian soldiers.
    • This can be seen as an indicator of increased Chinese assertiveness.
    • Since 73-day Doklam standoff on Sikkim-Bhutan border in 2017 there had been no major standoff.
    • PM Modi and President Xi met in Wuhan, following the Doklam crisis, and passed some instructions.

    Wuhan Coziness turned sour

    • Modi and Xi had met for their first informal summit at Wuhan in April 2018, where the two leaders had issued strategic guidance to their respective militaries.
    • These guidelines aimed to strengthen communication in order to build trust and mutual understanding and enhance predictability and effectiveness in the management of border affairs.
    • They had also directed their militaries to earnestly implement various confidence-building measures agreed upon between the two sides, including the principle of mutual and equal security.
    • But the latest border issues show hollowness of such talks.

    International forces in this bilateral ties

    • In addition to the border dispute, some of the core issues in the Sino-Indian rivalry include Tibet (the presence of the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan government-in-exile), the burgeoning China-Pakistan partnership, and the two countries’ overlapping spheres of influence in Asia.
    • These issues have become more salient in the context of the two countries’ simultaneous but asymmetric rising power.
    • In addition to accruing power domestically, India is also building strong strategic partnerships with China’s other rivals, especially the US and Japan.
    • Meanwhile, a rising China has stabilized its northern borders with Russia and is working to undermine the US primacy in the East Asian maritime (particularly the South China Sea).
    • This basically leaves only one border issue with a rival unresolved: namely, the Sino-Indian border.
    • It is hardly surprising that it is exerting periodic pressure on India along this front—a trend that is only likely to escalate.

    India should not fear. Why?

    To be sure, China’s regional aggression is COVID-proof. From Japan to Malaysia, Vietnam, Philippines and Taiwan, everyone has had to push back against Beijing’s marauding missions.

    1) India can retaliate

    • India, while still under-resourced, is no longer a pushover, having emerged stronger and wiser from the Depsang incident of 2013, when Chinese troops pitched tents to establish their control over the area.
    • India and China are both nuclear-armed countries with strong militaries.
    • India has been building a road along the Galwan River to Daulat Beg Oldie that would improve India’s access to the Karakoram Highway, as well as 61 border roads with a total length of 3,346 km across the Himalayan frontier.
    • The Indian Air Force’s capabilities have improved as well.

    2) China is wooing its people

    • Presently, China is in the midst of its annual “2 Sessions” of the CPCC (Chinese People’s Political Consultative Process) and NPC (National People’s Congress), where the ruling sentiment is how China is being bold and tough.
    • Hong Kong was an example of that sentiment. It is likely the India moves may be related. No softening or reasonableness can be expected from China until the NPC ends.
    • China is, as usual, changing the ground realities to influence a future boundary agreement.

    The ground realities before we think settlement

    • India sees China as occupying 38,000 sq km in Aksai Chin. In the east, China claims as much as 90,000 sq km, extending all across Arunachal Pradesh.
    • A swap was hinted at by China in 1960 and in the early 1980s, which would have essentially formalized the status quo.
    • Both sides have now ruled out the status quo as a settlement, agreeing to meaningful and mutual adjustments.
    • At the same time, the most realistic solution will involve only minor adjustments along the LAC, considering neither side will be willing to part with territory already held.

    Way forward

    • India and China should grasp the current situation as an opportunity to revive the stalled process of clarifying the LAC.
    • Clarifying the LAC may even provide a fresh impetus to the stalled boundary talks between the Special Representatives.
    • Beyond the posturing, both sides know a final settlement will ultimately have to use the LAC as a basis, with only minor adjustments. Only a settlement will end the shadow boxing on the LAC.
    • With both countries in the midst of an unprecedented global pandemic, the time to push for a settlement to a distracting, protracted dispute is now.

    Conclusion

    • The issue is basically the fundamental difference in how both sides view the boundary question.
    • India insists that its relations with China won’t improve until the border dispute is resolved.
    • But China differs here.
    • In some sense, Beijing appears to view an unsettled border as holding some leverage with India, one of the many pressure points it could use to keep India off-guard.
    • But for now, India should resist the Chinese design which could have disastrous consequences for India’s defence and strategic interests. Lastly, Diplomatic channels is always a better option than skirmishes on the borders.