When every economist worth his salt is getting pulled by print and digital media to share his/ her views on this topic, it calls for a deep introspection and a bout of Mussaddilal’s age old classic Office-Office to understand why things are not working for india on the Ease of doing business (World Bank Report).
If you want to follow the evolution of this news, follow this NewsTrail – Ease of Doing Business
If you want a quick infographic on the ranking methodology, we have an amazing infographic for you. Ignore the text in blue box at the end of the infographic but understand the static theory from this one.
Update: 11 parameters & 190 countries.
If you want to know more, read through what happened this year:
India remains one of the planet’s toughest places to do business, according to the World Bank.
In the development lender’s latest “Doing Business” report, which ranks 190 nations on how easy it is for private companies to follow regulations in 11 areas, India comes in 130th.
New Zealand tops this year’s ranking, dethroning Singapore. The World Bank highlighted Indonesia, Pakistan, Brunei and seven other economies for making the biggest improvements in their business environments in the past year.
The World Bank recognized some achievements by the Indian government this past year:
An electronic system for companies to pay employee insurance contributions,
Easier procedures for exporting and importing, and
New special mechanisms for resolving commercial disputes
What then is the reason for a relatively less improvement made by India at the world’s stage?
Due to even-larger improvements in other economies, India’s ranking in several areas fell this year.
On the ease of starting a business, it slipped to 155th from 151st.
On dealing with construction permits, it stumbled to 185th from 184th. On paying taxes, it held steady at 172nd.
Does this augur bad stuff for India? Are we not improving? Is the ranking an absolute measure to judge how we are doing?
NO. Far from it!
The World Bank report’s authors acknowledge that the ranking doesn’t reflect all the progress India has made recently in improving the business environment.
“Lawmakers have recommended the implementation of a large number of reforms across all states, going beyond the scope of Doing Business,” they write.
India of late has upgraded infrastructure,raised foreign-investment limits and digitized approvals and registrations. Groundwork was also laid this summer for a sales-tax revamp that hasn’t yet been implemented. (It might not even be implemented in time to affect next year’s Doing Business ranking, which will cover the business climate as of June 2017.)
So what went wrong?
First, some of the reforms undertaken missed this year’s bus—this report accounts for reforms which had been implemented by 1 June 2016. India also hopes that the insolvency and bankruptcy code will be implemented before the cut-off date for next year’s report
Second, the World Bank has included a new criterion “postfiling index” under the header “paying taxes”. Used in the report to measure the efficiency of “processes that occur after a firm complies with its regular tax obligations”, the post-filing index is a criterion in which India finds itself fourth from the bottom!
Third, there are other countries too trying their best to climb up the ease of doing business rankings.
Fourth, these rankings cover only the two cities of Delhi and Mumbai. A ranking of states last year showed the states of Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh leading the charts in implementing business reforms.
Therefore, India’s overall position may well be better than what this latest report shows!
TRIVIA:
Among the new features of this year’s Doing Business report is an attempt to gauge whether business rules apply differently to female and male entrepreneurs.
India should despatch a couple of envoys to Georgia and Kazakhstan each. In 2006, Georgia’s rank was 100; this year it ended up at No.16. Kazakhstan (now ranked 35) joined Georgia among the top improvers for the fourth time in the last 12 years.
In India, the bank found that despite yawning gender divides in many respects, the country makes doing business just as challenging for women as for men. It takes both male and female Mumbaikars 14 procedures and about a month, for instance, to start a new company. The irony of ironies!
If you want to take this time to revisit all the other important reports published by international organisations (for Prelims sake) – do visit this wholesome collection made by CD
#1. Consider following statements in regard with ‘Ease of Doing Business report’.
1.Ease of Doing Business report is published by World Bank.
2.India improved its position to 130 in the World Bank Ease of Doing Business 2017 report.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a) 1 only
b) 2 only
c) Both 1 and 2
d) Neither 1 nor 2
#2. India’s ranking in the ‘Ease of Doing Business Index’ is sometimes seen in the news. Which of the following has declared that ranking?
a) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
b) World Economic Forum
c) World Bank
d) World Trade Organization (WTO
Questions from Target Mains
#1. Ease of doing Business in India depends a lot on not just freedom to enter but also freedom to exit. In the light of the above statement critically discuss how the recently passed Bankruptcy Bill will improve the ease of doing business in India.
#2. According to a report, India is home to the third largest number of technology-driven start-ups in the world, with the US and the UK occupying the top two positions. Examine which factors have enabled India to achieve this feat.
#3. The marginal improvement by one rank i.e. from 131 to 130 in the Ease of Doing Business ranking is a reminder for several course corrections that are needed in the Indian politico-economic system. Comment.
Although India is a secular country, religion has a significant role in politics. Do you agree? How does religion affect politics and peoples attitudes in matters of politics?
Ease of doing Business in India depends a lot on not just freedom to enter but also freedom to exit. In the light of the above statement critically discuss how the recently passed Bankruptcy Bill will improve the ease of doing business in India.
The 2015 south-west monsoon, which irrigates over half of India’s crop area, recorded a 14% deficit, while the previous year saw a 12% deficit.
In the month of May, 2016 – Supreme Court made some very hard hitting comments on the state of drought management in India and minced no words while doing so.
The apex court rapped state governments for showing an “ostrich-like attitude” and denying reality. Not just the state, it rapped in the Union Govt. with a follow up – “Surely, if a state government maintains an ostrich-like attitude, a disaster requires a far more proactive and nuanced response form the Union of India. Therefore, in such a state of affairs… Where does the buck stop?”
Drought management, as you can see has assumed a very important space in our national discourse. It spans disaster management, agriculture economics, social welfare schemes and some important environmental aspects. A comprehensive understanding of drought will help you appreciate the huge machinery this bureaucracy is.
In this continuing series on Indian Agriculture, we will take help of the recent directions given by SC to understand the core themes & build a comprehensive narrative around draught.
6 Supreme Court notes that speak about all that’s wrong with drought management in India
Since these are SC notes (and not random opinions), you can use them to enrich your answers for IAS Mains.
#1. The govt. has been asked to abandon the existing system and evolve a transparent, rules-based framework. There is no need to continue with colonial methods and manuals that follow a colonial legacy.
What are the lacunae of current system? What are the hangovers of the colonial legacy that need to be undone
#2. SC asked the centre to use modern technology for early determination of drought and take into account humanitarian factors such as migration, suicides and the plight of women and children while formulating policies.
Begs the question – what are the far reaching – immediate and long term effects of drought?
#3. States should be proactive in declaring drought. The judges criticized Bihar, Gujarat and Haryana for their hesitancy in acknowledging drought and failure to disclose the reality on the ground.
Why do state show hesitancy in declaring drought? It looks counterintuitive that a state should willfully let its farmers suffer in silence. What’s the missing picture here?
#4. The court also directed the centre to be proactive rather than introducing “the concept of federalism” to delegate responsibility and saying its only role is to provide financial assistance to states.
#5. A national plan had not been formulated even after 10 years of the Act coming into force and the centre must act immediately
#6. The court also ordered that the existing drought management manual of 2009 be revised by the end of the year (2016).
Drought is usually studied under 5 heads:
Understanding Drought
Monitoring Drought
Declaring Drought – We won’t go into much details here and will answer the question on colonial legacy of declaring droughts vs. the changes SC prescribed
Providing Relief – Not useful for UPSC prep. This includes steps to be taken by various agencies under centre and state. We will skip this as well
Mitigating Drought
#1. Understanding Drought
What is Drought?
There is no universally accepted definition of drought
Drought occurs in all climatic regimes and is usually characterised in terms of its spatial extension, intensity and duration
It is a temporary aberration (don’t confuse it with aridity, which is permanent)
Being of slow-onset it is difficult to determine the beginning and end of the drought
Duration may range from months to years and the core area or epicentre changes over time! Hence there is a need for close monitoring of drought indicators
No single indicator or index can identify precisely the onset and severity of the event and its potential impacts; multiple indicators are more effective
Impacts are generally non-structural and difficult to quantify
Impacts of Drought – Direct & Indirect
Impacts are complex to quantify. Why? Because water is integral to our ability to produce goods and provide services.
Direct impacts: Usually physical / material and include reduced agricultural production. But drought is not just an agrarian crisis. When these direct impacts have multiplier effects through the economy and society, they are referred to as indirect impacts.
Indirect impacts: A reduction in agricultural production that may result in reduced income for farmers and agribusiness, increased prices for food and timber, unemployment, reduced purchasing capacity and demand for consumption, default on agricultural loans, rural unrest, and reduction in agricultural employment leading to migration and drought relief programmes
These direct and indirect impacts can be categorised into Economic, Environmental and Social Impacts.
Classification of Drought
Meteorological drought is defined as the deficiency of precipitation from expected or normal levels over an extended period of time
Hydrological drought is defined as deficiencies in surface and subsurface water supplies leading to a lack of water for normal and specific needs
Agricultural drought, usually triggered by meteorological and hydrological droughts, occurs when soil moisture and rainfall are inadequate during the crop growing season causing extreme crop stress and wilting
But classification of drought is not this simple, either. Agricultural drought occurs after meteorological and hydrological droughts but it has further nuances to it. Think about it – different cropping patterns, water needs, and stage of crop growth will also play a big part in defining an agricultural drought, right?
The classification of drought is difficult, so what does our Met dept. do? In 2016, the IMD (India Meteorological Department) declared an end to droughts in India!
Since it can’t control the weather but can control language, the state forecaster India Meteorological Department (IMD) has decided to simply replace the word “drought” to describe poor rainfall with “deficient year” and “large deficient year”.
This is not just an exercise in euphemism. There was a practical problem at hand which is being solved here. There is a lot of politics involved in declaring droughts.
IMD can only define a meteorological drought, but agricultural and hydrological droughts are different – hence, the states are best equipped to decide whether they were experiencing a drought or not. This is why the SC pulled up the states for displaying an ostrich like behavior and letting their farmers suffer.
The conditions for onset of drought in India vary across agro-climatic zones.
In the semi-arid regions, even a 400 mm rainfall would be adequate for the growth of crops, while in high rainfall regions of Assam, even an annual rainfall of 1,000 mm would create conditions for drought.
Drought is a recurrent climatic phenomenon because:
About 73% of the total annual rainfall is received in less than 100 days during the south-west monsoon and the geographic spread is uneven
Around 33% of the cropped area in the country receives less than 750 mm rain annually making such areas hotspots of drought
Irrigation, using groundwater aggravates the situation in the long term as groundwater withdrawal exceeds replenishment
Per capita water availability in the country is steadily declining. Traditional water harvesting systems have been largely abandoned.
At this point, let’s take a direct comment from Sunita Narain (CSE fame) on 3 things India should do:
First, do everything we can to augment water resources – catch every drop of water; store it; recharge groundwater. To do this we need to build millions more structures, but this time based on planning for water and not just employment
Second, revise and update the drought code. It is not as if the richer parts of the world do not have droughts but their governments respond by shutting off all non-essential water use.
Third, obsessively work to secure water in all times. This means insisting on water codes for everyday India. We need to reduce water usage in all sectors – from agriculture, urban to industry
#2. Monitoring Drought
Monitoring and Early Warning Systems
As drought is a slow-onset disaster, its monitoring and early warning systems are central to drought management.
The early warning system should function at 3 levels:
Receiving forecasts, early warning, and advisories from scientific institutions;
Monitoring key drought indices at the National and State levels; and
Developing composite index of various drought indicators
Key Drought Indicators
Old vs. New System for Drought Management
Gaps in the colonial system of drought management:
It emphasizes a relief-based approach and provides certain other small concessions, which do little to alleviate the distress caused by widespread crop failure
It functions on the basis of a conclusive evidence of drought as derived from the crop production in a particular year, which takes a lot of time as well as prevents early and timely help to farmers
It did not integrate new technologies for early warning, nor did it emphasize mitigation as an essential element of drought management
A new approach to drought management focusses on:
State management of drought operations can make a radical difference to the impact of drought.
Focus on mitigation measures – An emphasis on mitigation measures would reduce the incidence and severity of drought, improve crop production and save resources spent recurrently on relief
Adopt newer technologies – Due to spectacular advances in climate forecast technologies, State Governments are in a position to outsource the forecast from many agencies other than the India Meteorological Department (IMD)
Adapt to the new legal framework – The local self-governments have become more important in terms of sharing authority and responsibility (due to 73rd and 74th Constitutional amendments), and it is necessary to assign meaningful roles in drought management to this level
Include employment and area development programmes in drought mitigation
#5. Implementing Drought Mitigation Measures
Artificial Recharge of Ground Water
A typical watershed development programme has several components, depending on the topography. These include – Contour Bunding, Contour Trenching, Contour Cultivation, Farm Ponds, Percolation Tanks (PT) / Spreading Basin etc.
One of the effective measures by which groundwater recharge can be achieved, is by the construction and use of percolation tanks. The efficacy and feasibility of percolation tanks is better established in hard rock formation where the rocks are highly fractured and weathered.
Long-term Irrigation Management
Integrated Basin Planning: This concept is aimed at coordinating water resources plans throughout a river basin, the most important example of which is the Tennessee Valley Authority in the USA. In India, the Damodar Valley Corporation covering the river Damodar and its tributaries in Bihar and West Bengal was modeled on the lines of the Tennessee Valley Authority.
Inter-basin Transfer of Water: The permanent long-term solution to the drought problem may be found in the basic principles of transfer of power from surplus river basins to the areas of deficit.
There are some success stories at regional basis under which water is transferred from one basin to another. For eg. –
Indira Gandhi canal – Transfer of water from Indus basin to deserts of Rajasthan
Periyar project – Transfer of water from Periyar basin to Vaigai basin
Kurnool Cudappah Canal – Transfer of water from Krishna basin to Pennar basin
Let us know if this article helped you understand the issue better. Your comments and appreciation is the only way we can gauge the relevance of our efforts put in researching these articles.
This year has been a hotbed of activities and high level meetings around this core topic. Now that you have understood this in good detail – answer this question.
“Drought is not a disaster, but a management issue”. Justify this statement.
References: Apart from extensive research around news articles, the mainstay of this series is the annual report of the Ministry of Agriculture to the GOI –Click to download a copy
Nuclear weapons are the most destructive weapons ever developed. The right to possess these weapons is an issue of serious contention in the international community. Non-proliferation treaties exist within the United Nations, and between countries, such as between the United States and Russia. The most comprehensive, the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), consists of a pledge by current nuclear weapon states to reduce their nuclear stockpiles and achieve nuclear disarmament in return for non-nuclear weapon states not developing such weapons.
While some countries and institutions are eager to see a reduction in nuclear weapon stockpiles, others are eagerly seeking to obtain them. North Korea recently developed their first functional nuclear weapon, and Iran is often accused of attempting to develop their own. Such countries have met with international condemnation.
So far, despite the NPT, those who were recognized as nuclear powers have not upheld their side of the bargain and disarmed. This has led to the question of whether other countries should also have a right to nuclear armament. Those that are trying to prevent these regimes gaining nuclear weapons counter that despite slow progress the NPT still applies. They are worried that weapons developed by less wealthy states are more likely to fall into the hands of terrorists, either through a lack of secure facilities or through being sold.
Bring out valid arguments in favour of nuclear disarmament in the light of
What do you understand by MCLR? Why was it introduced in India? Why have we not been able to achieve perfect monetary transmission till now? What should be done to improve the situation?
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016 passed by the Parliament is thought to be a welcome move but various concerns still persist about the child labour. In the light of the above statement, critically discuss the various amendments to Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act.
Recently the government has come with a draft bill on passive euthanasia. What is passive euthanasia? What are the concerns associated with the practice and the bill?
UGC has failed to evolve according to the changing dynamics of higher education, and has fallen short of achieving its original mandate? Critically comment on this statement in the light of recent recommendation of TSR Subramaniam committee on UGC.
What are codes of conduct? Have they been successful in preventing misuse of office by public servants? Provide suggestions to improve their effectiveness.
Describe the key features of the Ramanuja’s Vishishtadvaita or qualified oneness philosophy. Also discuss the relevance of Ramanuja’s Teachings in the contemporary world. (Event: 1000th Birthday of Saint Ramanuja)
Air India (AI) is encountering problems with the operation of landing gear of its passenger aircrafts. In the past one year three separate incidents of similar landing gear failures have occurred on Boeing 777-200LR passenger aircrafts, all operated by AI. It has floated a tender to procure 216 landing gears for its fleet of Airbus and Boeing aircraft serving 84 domestic and international destinations.
You are the president of a company that produces dedicated landing gears for passenger aircrafts. You have submitted your bid for providing this equipment to the AI. You have ensured that the value and rate of your offer remains better than those of the other contestants to the bid. Still the concerned AI officer is demanding a hefty bribe for approving the tender. It is vital to get this order both for you and for your firm. Not receiving the order would mean closing a manufacturing line. It may also disturb your own career. However, as a truthful person, you do not want to pay bribe.
List effective arguments for
(a) paying bribe and reception of the order, and
(b) not paying bribe and conceding the order to competitors.
Suggest a way to get out of this standoff?
Outline the main fundamentals behind this third way.
