Context
Some bank borrowers have gone to court demanding that it quash the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circular dated August 6, 2020 on opening current accounts.
Background
- Current accounts with non-lending banks are an important channel for diversion.
- Diversion of funds is a major reason for large non-performing assets (NPAs).
- Internal diversion is for non-priority purposes and funds can also be diverted to other firms, owned or controlled by the same group, friends or relatives.
- To prevent this, the RBI mandates a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from lending banks before opening such accounts.
- Banks should verify with CRILC, the RBI credit database, and inform lenders. Banks should also obtain a NOC from the drawee bank when an account is opened through cheques.
- Widespread non-compliance with mandated safeguards forced the RBI to bar non-lending banks from opening current accounts for large borrowers.
- Thus, if borrowing is through a cash credit or overdraft account, no bank can open a current account.
What are the current regulations?
- If a borrower has no cash credit or overdraft account, a current account can be opened subject to restrictions.
- If the bank’s exposure is less than 10% of total borrowings, debits to the account can only be for transfers to accounts with a designated bank.
- If total borrowing is ₹50 crore or more, there should be an escrow mechanism managed by one bank which alone can open a current account.
- Other lending banks can open ‘collection accounts’ from which funds will be periodically transferred to the escrow account.
- If the borrowing is between ₹5 crore and ₹50 crore, lending banks can open current accounts.
- Non-lending banks can open collection accounts.
- If borrowing is below ₹5 crore, even non-lending banks can open current accounts.
- The working capital credit should be bifurcated into loan and cash credit components at individual bank levels.
Issues with regulations
- If a borrower has an overdraft, how can there not be a current account?
- An overdraft is the right to overdraw in a current account up to a limit.
- The second issue is that the circular forecloses such operational flexibility.
- Third, why should a bank with low exposure transfer funds to another bank when it can use it to adjust other dues with it?
- Fourth, share in borrowing is not static. Crossing the threshold both ways could happen often.
- Fifth, there is a mismatch between what a borrower needs and the regulations allow.
- Support of non-lending banks through current accounts in other banks is required for large accounts.
- Sixth, transactions in an active current account enables a bank to monitor a borrower’s account, however small.
- The lack of such control was why large development financial institutions of yesteryear built up huge NPAs.
- Seventh, the regulation mandates splitting working capital into loan and cash credit components across all banks.
- Such a one-size-fits-all regulation does not factor in the purpose of the different facilities.
- A large company might avail itself of loans in Mumbai, but require current accounts with another bank in Assam where it might have a factory.
- Lack of flexibility: Rules are not flexible, do not provide for unforeseen circumstances, and can be easily circumvented.
- Use more generic terms: Regulation needs to use more generic terms. Terms such as Working Capital Term Loan might mean different things in different banks.
- Diversion of fund is risk better dealt by banks: Is it not better to leave management of exceptional risks such as diversion of funds to the banks?
- The cost of regulation: the costs of regulation be justified by the benefits.
Conclusion
When regulation ignores market practices, it lacks legitimacy, a construct from neo-institutionalist literature. When legitimacy is wanting, compliance suffers.
UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)
